Standard

Prosodic clues to syntactic processing - A PET and ERP study. / Strelnikov, K. N.; Vorobyev, V. A.; Chernigovskaya, T. V.; Medvedev, S. V.

в: NeuroImage, Том 29, № 4, 15.02.2006, стр. 1127-1134.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Strelnikov, KN, Vorobyev, VA, Chernigovskaya, TV & Medvedev, SV 2006, 'Prosodic clues to syntactic processing - A PET and ERP study', NeuroImage, Том. 29, № 4, стр. 1127-1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.021

APA

Strelnikov, K. N., Vorobyev, V. A., Chernigovskaya, T. V., & Medvedev, S. V. (2006). Prosodic clues to syntactic processing - A PET and ERP study. NeuroImage, 29(4), 1127-1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.021

Vancouver

Strelnikov KN, Vorobyev VA, Chernigovskaya TV, Medvedev SV. Prosodic clues to syntactic processing - A PET and ERP study. NeuroImage. 2006 Февр. 15;29(4):1127-1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.021

Author

Strelnikov, K. N. ; Vorobyev, V. A. ; Chernigovskaya, T. V. ; Medvedev, S. V. / Prosodic clues to syntactic processing - A PET and ERP study. в: NeuroImage. 2006 ; Том 29, № 4. стр. 1127-1134.

BibTeX

@article{0489685e38354d2a83f1d212b34b66ad,
title = "Prosodic clues to syntactic processing - A PET and ERP study",
abstract = "Syntactic processing of spoken speech often involves prosodic clues processing. In the present PET and ERP study, subjects listened to phrases in which different prosodic segmentation dramatically changed the meaning of the phrase. In the contrast of segmented vs. non-segmented phrases, PET data revealed activation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and in the right cerebellum. These brain structures, therefore, might be part of the syntactic analysis network involved in prosodic segmentation and pitch processing. ERP results revealed frontal negativity that was sensitive to the position of the segmenting pause, possibly reflecting prosody-based semantic prediction. The present results are discussed in the context of their relation to brain networks of emotions, prosody, and syntax perception.",
keywords = "Brain imaging, ERP, Language, PET, Prosodic, Speech perception, Syntactic",
author = "Strelnikov, {K. N.} and Vorobyev, {V. A.} and Chernigovskaya, {T. V.} and Medvedev, {S. V.}",
year = "2006",
month = feb,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.021",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1127--1134",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosodic clues to syntactic processing - A PET and ERP study

AU - Strelnikov, K. N.

AU - Vorobyev, V. A.

AU - Chernigovskaya, T. V.

AU - Medvedev, S. V.

PY - 2006/2/15

Y1 - 2006/2/15

N2 - Syntactic processing of spoken speech often involves prosodic clues processing. In the present PET and ERP study, subjects listened to phrases in which different prosodic segmentation dramatically changed the meaning of the phrase. In the contrast of segmented vs. non-segmented phrases, PET data revealed activation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and in the right cerebellum. These brain structures, therefore, might be part of the syntactic analysis network involved in prosodic segmentation and pitch processing. ERP results revealed frontal negativity that was sensitive to the position of the segmenting pause, possibly reflecting prosody-based semantic prediction. The present results are discussed in the context of their relation to brain networks of emotions, prosody, and syntax perception.

AB - Syntactic processing of spoken speech often involves prosodic clues processing. In the present PET and ERP study, subjects listened to phrases in which different prosodic segmentation dramatically changed the meaning of the phrase. In the contrast of segmented vs. non-segmented phrases, PET data revealed activation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and in the right cerebellum. These brain structures, therefore, might be part of the syntactic analysis network involved in prosodic segmentation and pitch processing. ERP results revealed frontal negativity that was sensitive to the position of the segmenting pause, possibly reflecting prosody-based semantic prediction. The present results are discussed in the context of their relation to brain networks of emotions, prosody, and syntax perception.

KW - Brain imaging

KW - ERP

KW - Language

KW - PET

KW - Prosodic

KW - Speech perception

KW - Syntactic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31844442752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.021

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 16188459

AN - SCOPUS:31844442752

VL - 29

SP - 1127

EP - 1134

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 60495005