Standard

Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context : Agenda for methodological pluralism. / Sootla , Georg ; Gutorov , Vladimir .

в: ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА: ПОЛИТЭКС, Том 16, № 2, 2020, стр. 184-209.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Sootla , G & Gutorov , V 2020, 'Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context: Agenda for methodological pluralism', ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА: ПОЛИТЭКС, Том. 16, № 2, стр. 184-209.

APA

Sootla , G., & Gutorov , V. (2020). Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context: Agenda for methodological pluralism. ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА: ПОЛИТЭКС, 16(2), 184-209.

Vancouver

Sootla G, Gutorov V. Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context: Agenda for methodological pluralism. ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2020;16(2):184-209.

Author

Sootla , Georg ; Gutorov , Vladimir . / Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context : Agenda for methodological pluralism. в: ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2020 ; Том 16, № 2. стр. 184-209.

BibTeX

@article{0bd49c15c89147149fdcc53be30acd3e,
title = "Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context: Agenda for methodological pluralism",
abstract = "In this article we demonstrate why and how in the Western science of policymaking a challenge posited by empirical behaviouralism aimed at reforming the over-politicised policy process along the analytical-rational lines in 1950s did not succeeded. However, it produced a meaningful shift in understanding the policy process and it formed by the 1970s a completely new conceptual context and discourse on the policy process. As a result, by the new millennium the positivist and constructivists perspectives, that are located at the opposite ends of the continuum of methodological presumptions, started to complement each other and even to intermingle at the level of providing practical policy solutions.",
keywords = "policy analysis, interactive policymaking, policy frames, policy learning, wicked issued, design rationality, method of critical dialogue, policy analysis, interactive policymaking, policy frames, policy learning, wicked issued, design rationality, method of critical dialogue",
author = "Georg Sootla and Vladimir Gutorov",
note = "Sootla G., Gutorov V. Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context: Agenda for methodological pluralism. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2020, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 184–209. ",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "184--209",
journal = "ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА: ПОЛИТЭКС",
issn = "1818-4499",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context

T2 - Agenda for methodological pluralism

AU - Sootla , Georg

AU - Gutorov , Vladimir

N1 - Sootla G., Gutorov V. Policy analysis in uncertain and ambiguous context: Agenda for methodological pluralism. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2020, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 184–209.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In this article we demonstrate why and how in the Western science of policymaking a challenge posited by empirical behaviouralism aimed at reforming the over-politicised policy process along the analytical-rational lines in 1950s did not succeeded. However, it produced a meaningful shift in understanding the policy process and it formed by the 1970s a completely new conceptual context and discourse on the policy process. As a result, by the new millennium the positivist and constructivists perspectives, that are located at the opposite ends of the continuum of methodological presumptions, started to complement each other and even to intermingle at the level of providing practical policy solutions.

AB - In this article we demonstrate why and how in the Western science of policymaking a challenge posited by empirical behaviouralism aimed at reforming the over-politicised policy process along the analytical-rational lines in 1950s did not succeeded. However, it produced a meaningful shift in understanding the policy process and it formed by the 1970s a completely new conceptual context and discourse on the policy process. As a result, by the new millennium the positivist and constructivists perspectives, that are located at the opposite ends of the continuum of methodological presumptions, started to complement each other and even to intermingle at the level of providing practical policy solutions.

KW - policy analysis, interactive policymaking, policy frames, policy learning, wicked issued, design rationality, method of critical dialogue

KW - policy analysis

KW - interactive policymaking

KW - policy frames

KW - policy learning

KW - wicked issued

KW - design rationality

KW - method of critical dialogue

UR - https://politex.spbu.ru/article/view/9292/6827

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 184

EP - 209

JO - ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА: ПОЛИТЭКС

JF - ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА: ПОЛИТЭКС

SN - 1818-4499

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 64674481