Standard

Neil Fligstein’s Concept of Organizational Fields, Economic Processes and Dynamics, and Their Significance for Building Russian Markets. / Румянцева, Светлана Юрьевна; Мусаева, Айнур Мобилевна.

Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy: A New Analytic Tool from Field Theory. ред. / J. K. Hass. USA : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2018. стр. 243-276.

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийглава/разделнаучнаяРецензирование

Harvard

Румянцева, СЮ & Мусаева, АМ 2018, Neil Fligstein’s Concept of Organizational Fields, Economic Processes and Dynamics, and Their Significance for Building Russian Markets. в JK Hass (ред.), Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy: A New Analytic Tool from Field Theory. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., USA, стр. 243-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_10

APA

Румянцева, С. Ю., & Мусаева, А. М. (2018). Neil Fligstein’s Concept of Organizational Fields, Economic Processes and Dynamics, and Their Significance for Building Russian Markets. в J. K. Hass (Ред.), Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy: A New Analytic Tool from Field Theory (стр. 243-276). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_10

Vancouver

Румянцева СЮ, Мусаева АМ. Neil Fligstein’s Concept of Organizational Fields, Economic Processes and Dynamics, and Their Significance for Building Russian Markets. в Hass JK, Редактор, Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy: A New Analytic Tool from Field Theory. USA: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. 2018. стр. 243-276 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_10

Author

Румянцева, Светлана Юрьевна ; Мусаева, Айнур Мобилевна. / Neil Fligstein’s Concept of Organizational Fields, Economic Processes and Dynamics, and Their Significance for Building Russian Markets. Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy: A New Analytic Tool from Field Theory. Редактор / J. K. Hass. USA : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2018. стр. 243-276

BibTeX

@inbook{d59ac26151cf446fbbc1ef6d34b9666f,
title = "Neil Fligstein{\textquoteright}s Concept of Organizational Fields, Economic Processes and Dynamics, and Their Significance for Building Russian Markets",
abstract = "This chapter brings together a field framework and economic theories linkedto growth and innovation, including evolutionary economics. One couldargue that field theory tends to privilege reproduction over change, and whilea field framework can accommodate change, scholars usually invoke it toexamine reproduction. The authors draw on Fligstein{\textquoteright}s insights that exogenousshocks—whether economic downturns or sudden state intervention—canforce field leaders and members to seek new field rules and conceptions ofcontrol. These might not always favor innovation, however, as rent-seeking orsimply maintaining stability can outweigh perceived opportunities and gainsfrom innovation. Further, field rules in contemporary Russia are not so kindto innovation, as too many (but not all) field leaders in the state and businessprefer stability, often enough for rent-seeking. To the extent there might besome hope, however, it is with professionalization, especially in arbitrationcourts.",
author = "Румянцева, {Светлана Юрьевна} and Мусаева, {Айнур Мобилевна}",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319754130",
pages = "243--276",
editor = "Hass, {J. K. }",
booktitle = "Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Neil Fligstein’s Concept of Organizational Fields, Economic Processes and Dynamics, and Their Significance for Building Russian Markets

AU - Румянцева, Светлана Юрьевна

AU - Мусаева, Айнур Мобилевна

PY - 2018/6/14

Y1 - 2018/6/14

N2 - This chapter brings together a field framework and economic theories linkedto growth and innovation, including evolutionary economics. One couldargue that field theory tends to privilege reproduction over change, and whilea field framework can accommodate change, scholars usually invoke it toexamine reproduction. The authors draw on Fligstein’s insights that exogenousshocks—whether economic downturns or sudden state intervention—canforce field leaders and members to seek new field rules and conceptions ofcontrol. These might not always favor innovation, however, as rent-seeking orsimply maintaining stability can outweigh perceived opportunities and gainsfrom innovation. Further, field rules in contemporary Russia are not so kindto innovation, as too many (but not all) field leaders in the state and businessprefer stability, often enough for rent-seeking. To the extent there might besome hope, however, it is with professionalization, especially in arbitrationcourts.

AB - This chapter brings together a field framework and economic theories linkedto growth and innovation, including evolutionary economics. One couldargue that field theory tends to privilege reproduction over change, and whilea field framework can accommodate change, scholars usually invoke it toexamine reproduction. The authors draw on Fligstein’s insights that exogenousshocks—whether economic downturns or sudden state intervention—canforce field leaders and members to seek new field rules and conceptions ofcontrol. These might not always favor innovation, however, as rent-seeking orsimply maintaining stability can outweigh perceived opportunities and gainsfrom innovation. Further, field rules in contemporary Russia are not so kindto innovation, as too many (but not all) field leaders in the state and businessprefer stability, often enough for rent-seeking. To the extent there might besome hope, however, it is with professionalization, especially in arbitrationcourts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053590751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_10

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319754130

SP - 243

EP - 276

BT - Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy

A2 - Hass, J. K.

PB - Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

CY - USA

ER -

ID: 34843924