Standard

Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity. / Lanko, D. A. .

в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского универистета. Международные отношения, Том 15, № 3, 01.10.2022, стр. 243-261.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Lanko, DA 2022, 'Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity', Вестник Санкт-Петербургского универистета. Международные отношения, Том. 15, № 3, стр. 243-261. <https://irjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/14453/9757>

APA

Lanko, D. A. (2022). Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского универистета. Международные отношения, 15(3), 243-261. https://irjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/14453/9757

Vancouver

Lanko DA. Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского универистета. Международные отношения. 2022 Окт. 1;15(3):243-261.

Author

Lanko, D. A. . / Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity. в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского универистета. Международные отношения. 2022 ; Том 15, № 3. стр. 243-261.

BibTeX

@article{ad2c6d55a8904c73877250e4f0bde16f,
title = "Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity",
abstract = "The article revisits the negotiations on NORDEK, a Nordic Economic Area, held by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden in 1968-1970. Finland, which initially took active part in the negotiations, later reversed its position under pressure from the Soviet Union as well as for other reasons. Four remaining Nordic countries refused to pursue a Nordic Economic Area without Finland for multiple reasons, of which one was solidarity with Finland. This article presents multiple game models, of which some reflect the actual outcome of the NORDEK negotiations, i. e., their failure, while others reflect hypothetical outcomes of the negotiations, such as emergence of a NORDEK of four without Finland. Those models allow concluding on the main factors causing Nordic solidarity, for which the NORDEK negotiations were a testing ground, and which had been the defining feature of regional politics in the European North during fifty years following the failure of the negotiations. First, domestic uncertainty about the issue debated by multiple nations contributes to greater solidarity among those nations. Second, majority{\textquoteright}s focus on their absolute gains during international negotiations contributes to greater solidarity among negotiating nations. Third, relative equality among negotiating nations does not have any influence on solidarity among them. The latter conclusion supports the theoretical assumption that that organic solidarity (solidarity among different) is as possible as is mechanical solidarity (solidarity of similar).",
keywords = "NORDEK, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, solidarity, uncertainty, absolute gains, economic power, NORDEK, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Solidarity, uncertainty, RELATIVE GAINS, economic power",
author = "Lanko, {D. A.}",
note = "Lanko, Dmitry. (2022). {"}Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity{"}. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University. International Relations 15(3): 243-261. ",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "243--261",
journal = " ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ",
issn = "2411-121X",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity

AU - Lanko, D. A.

N1 - Lanko, Dmitry. (2022). "Modelling Negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and Absolute Gains as Factors of International Solidarity". Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University. International Relations 15(3): 243-261.

PY - 2022/10/1

Y1 - 2022/10/1

N2 - The article revisits the negotiations on NORDEK, a Nordic Economic Area, held by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden in 1968-1970. Finland, which initially took active part in the negotiations, later reversed its position under pressure from the Soviet Union as well as for other reasons. Four remaining Nordic countries refused to pursue a Nordic Economic Area without Finland for multiple reasons, of which one was solidarity with Finland. This article presents multiple game models, of which some reflect the actual outcome of the NORDEK negotiations, i. e., their failure, while others reflect hypothetical outcomes of the negotiations, such as emergence of a NORDEK of four without Finland. Those models allow concluding on the main factors causing Nordic solidarity, for which the NORDEK negotiations were a testing ground, and which had been the defining feature of regional politics in the European North during fifty years following the failure of the negotiations. First, domestic uncertainty about the issue debated by multiple nations contributes to greater solidarity among those nations. Second, majority’s focus on their absolute gains during international negotiations contributes to greater solidarity among negotiating nations. Third, relative equality among negotiating nations does not have any influence on solidarity among them. The latter conclusion supports the theoretical assumption that that organic solidarity (solidarity among different) is as possible as is mechanical solidarity (solidarity of similar).

AB - The article revisits the negotiations on NORDEK, a Nordic Economic Area, held by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden in 1968-1970. Finland, which initially took active part in the negotiations, later reversed its position under pressure from the Soviet Union as well as for other reasons. Four remaining Nordic countries refused to pursue a Nordic Economic Area without Finland for multiple reasons, of which one was solidarity with Finland. This article presents multiple game models, of which some reflect the actual outcome of the NORDEK negotiations, i. e., their failure, while others reflect hypothetical outcomes of the negotiations, such as emergence of a NORDEK of four without Finland. Those models allow concluding on the main factors causing Nordic solidarity, for which the NORDEK negotiations were a testing ground, and which had been the defining feature of regional politics in the European North during fifty years following the failure of the negotiations. First, domestic uncertainty about the issue debated by multiple nations contributes to greater solidarity among those nations. Second, majority’s focus on their absolute gains during international negotiations contributes to greater solidarity among negotiating nations. Third, relative equality among negotiating nations does not have any influence on solidarity among them. The latter conclusion supports the theoretical assumption that that organic solidarity (solidarity among different) is as possible as is mechanical solidarity (solidarity of similar).

KW - NORDEK

KW - Finland

KW - Sweden

KW - Norway

KW - Iceland

KW - Denmark

KW - solidarity

KW - uncertainty

KW - absolute gains

KW - economic power

KW - NORDEK

KW - Denmark

KW - Finland

KW - Iceland

KW - Norway

KW - Sweden

KW - Solidarity

KW - uncertainty

KW - RELATIVE GAINS

KW - economic power

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49485913

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 243

EP - 261

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ

SN - 2411-121X

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 100102979