Standard

Mission (im)possible? UN military peacekeeping operations in civil wars. / Pushkina, Darya; Siewert, Markus B.; Wolff, Stefan.

в: European Journal of International Relations, Том 28, 03.2022, стр. 158-186.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Pushkina, D, Siewert, MB & Wolff, S 2022, 'Mission (im)possible? UN military peacekeeping operations in civil wars', European Journal of International Relations, Том. 28, стр. 158-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661211046602

APA

Pushkina, D., Siewert, M. B., & Wolff, S. (2022). Mission (im)possible? UN military peacekeeping operations in civil wars. European Journal of International Relations, 28, 158-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661211046602

Vancouver

Pushkina D, Siewert MB, Wolff S. Mission (im)possible? UN military peacekeeping operations in civil wars. European Journal of International Relations. 2022 Март;28:158-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661211046602

Author

Pushkina, Darya ; Siewert, Markus B. ; Wolff, Stefan. / Mission (im)possible? UN military peacekeeping operations in civil wars. в: European Journal of International Relations. 2022 ; Том 28. стр. 158-186.

BibTeX

@article{4ba348418cc545ddbb551ac43b7ce39e,
title = "Mission (im)possible? UN military peacekeeping operations in civil wars",
abstract = "Under what conditions can UN military peacekeeping operations (PKOs) succeed in contexts of civil war? This is an important question given the prevalence and cost of civil wars and the high, yet not always fulfilled, expectations of very costly military PKOs as responses to them by the international community. Yet, the academic and policy debates on this question are as long-standing as they are unresolved. Our article contributes to existing scholarship in several ways. First, adopting a nuanced and multi-dimensional definition of success that considers violence, displacement, and contagion as its 3 essential components, we identified 19 cases of full or partial successes, and 13 full or partial failures, covering all 32 UN military PKOs deployed to civil war settings. Second, we develop an original dataset and analytical framework that identifies a wide range of plausible factors related to the dynamics of both the intervention and the underlying conflict it is meant to address. Third, applying qualitative comparative analysis to our dataset of these 32 military PKOs, our key finding is that what matters most and consistently across all of these missions is the presence or absence of domestic consent to, and cooperation with, deployed PKOs.",
keywords = "civil wars, conflict management, international intervention, peace processes, qualitative comparative analysis, UN peacekeeping operations",
author = "Darya Pushkina and Siewert, {Markus B.} and Stefan Wolff",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1177/13540661211046602",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "158--186",
journal = "European Journal of International Relations",
issn = "1354-0661",
publisher = "SAGE",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mission (im)possible? UN military peacekeeping operations in civil wars

AU - Pushkina, Darya

AU - Siewert, Markus B.

AU - Wolff, Stefan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021.

PY - 2022/3

Y1 - 2022/3

N2 - Under what conditions can UN military peacekeeping operations (PKOs) succeed in contexts of civil war? This is an important question given the prevalence and cost of civil wars and the high, yet not always fulfilled, expectations of very costly military PKOs as responses to them by the international community. Yet, the academic and policy debates on this question are as long-standing as they are unresolved. Our article contributes to existing scholarship in several ways. First, adopting a nuanced and multi-dimensional definition of success that considers violence, displacement, and contagion as its 3 essential components, we identified 19 cases of full or partial successes, and 13 full or partial failures, covering all 32 UN military PKOs deployed to civil war settings. Second, we develop an original dataset and analytical framework that identifies a wide range of plausible factors related to the dynamics of both the intervention and the underlying conflict it is meant to address. Third, applying qualitative comparative analysis to our dataset of these 32 military PKOs, our key finding is that what matters most and consistently across all of these missions is the presence or absence of domestic consent to, and cooperation with, deployed PKOs.

AB - Under what conditions can UN military peacekeeping operations (PKOs) succeed in contexts of civil war? This is an important question given the prevalence and cost of civil wars and the high, yet not always fulfilled, expectations of very costly military PKOs as responses to them by the international community. Yet, the academic and policy debates on this question are as long-standing as they are unresolved. Our article contributes to existing scholarship in several ways. First, adopting a nuanced and multi-dimensional definition of success that considers violence, displacement, and contagion as its 3 essential components, we identified 19 cases of full or partial successes, and 13 full or partial failures, covering all 32 UN military PKOs deployed to civil war settings. Second, we develop an original dataset and analytical framework that identifies a wide range of plausible factors related to the dynamics of both the intervention and the underlying conflict it is meant to address. Third, applying qualitative comparative analysis to our dataset of these 32 military PKOs, our key finding is that what matters most and consistently across all of these missions is the presence or absence of domestic consent to, and cooperation with, deployed PKOs.

KW - civil wars

KW - conflict management

KW - international intervention

KW - peace processes

KW - qualitative comparative analysis

KW - UN peacekeeping operations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115377828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/13540661211046602

DO - 10.1177/13540661211046602

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85115377828

VL - 28

SP - 158

EP - 186

JO - European Journal of International Relations

JF - European Journal of International Relations

SN - 1354-0661

ER -

ID: 92334249