TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Peace with War

T2 - Adaptation and the Soviet Political Economy in the Blockade of Leningrad

AU - Хасс, Джеффри Кеннет

AU - Ломагин, Никита Андреевич

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Saint-Petersburg State University. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - War demands the capacity of state elites and officials, and institutions, to adapt to challenges. One constant refrain in Western accounts was the inability of the Soviet command economy to adapt-yet that command economy contributed to survival and eventual victory. To what extent could and did economic actors and institutions adapt to new circumstances, versus following tried-and-true policies of the 1930s? In this article, we use the case of Leningrad in late 1941 and 1942, when the Blockade provided severe challenges and became more than a fleeting military event. One of the most important challenge (if not the most important) was the supply and distribution of food to maintain the operation of the city and military production. The massive death toll revealed the degree of the challenge, the force of the German siege, and the lack of sufficient preparation beforehand. Yet the regime did implement innovations and adaptations in obtaining and provisioning. We focus on one set of formal policies: the streamlining of food distribution and the expansion of podsobnoe khoziaistvo (successes), and the possibility of using fish (a failure). These policies were grounded in existing institutional templates and knowledge; however, fishing policies revealed contradictions between civilian and military actors. More radical innovations would require informality; but the Soviet regime could adapt.

AB - War demands the capacity of state elites and officials, and institutions, to adapt to challenges. One constant refrain in Western accounts was the inability of the Soviet command economy to adapt-yet that command economy contributed to survival and eventual victory. To what extent could and did economic actors and institutions adapt to new circumstances, versus following tried-and-true policies of the 1930s? In this article, we use the case of Leningrad in late 1941 and 1942, when the Blockade provided severe challenges and became more than a fleeting military event. One of the most important challenge (if not the most important) was the supply and distribution of food to maintain the operation of the city and military production. The massive death toll revealed the degree of the challenge, the force of the German siege, and the lack of sufficient preparation beforehand. Yet the regime did implement innovations and adaptations in obtaining and provisioning. We focus on one set of formal policies: the streamlining of food distribution and the expansion of podsobnoe khoziaistvo (successes), and the possibility of using fish (a failure). These policies were grounded in existing institutional templates and knowledge; however, fishing policies revealed contradictions between civilian and military actors. More radical innovations would require informality; but the Soviet regime could adapt.

KW - blockade

KW - command economy

KW - Leningrad

KW - political economy

KW - rationing

KW - World War II

KW - blockade

KW - command economy

KW - Leningrad

KW - political economy

KW - rationing

KW - World War II

KW - Rationing

KW - Blockade

KW - Command economy

KW - Political economy

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/330dd446-27ad-3314-9900-4288d8b1c129/

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088397208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21638/11701/spbu24.2020.104

DO - 10.21638/11701/spbu24.2020.104

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 53

EP - 69

JO - Modern History of Russia

JF - Modern History of Russia

SN - 2219-9659

IS - 1

ER -