Standard

IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. / Ob’edkova, K. V.; Kogan, I. Y.; Muller, V. C.; Tapilskaya, N. I.; Krikhely, I. O.; Dzhemlikhanova, L. Kh; Abdulkadirova, Z. K.; Mekina, I. D.; Lesik, E. A.; Komarova, E. A.; Ishchuk, M. A.; Gzgzian, A. M.

в: Gynecological Endocrinology, Том 37, № S1, 01.01.2021, стр. 44-48.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Ob’edkova, KV, Kogan, IY, Muller, VC, Tapilskaya, NI, Krikhely, IO, Dzhemlikhanova, LK, Abdulkadirova, ZK, Mekina, ID, Lesik, EA, Komarova, EA, Ishchuk, MA & Gzgzian, AM 2021, 'IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode', Gynecological Endocrinology, Том. 37, № S1, стр. 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2021.2006526

APA

Ob’edkova, K. V., Kogan, I. Y., Muller, V. C., Tapilskaya, N. I., Krikhely, I. O., Dzhemlikhanova, L. K., Abdulkadirova, Z. K., Mekina, I. D., Lesik, E. A., Komarova, E. A., Ishchuk, M. A., & Gzgzian, A. M. (2021). IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. Gynecological Endocrinology, 37(S1), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2021.2006526

Vancouver

Ob’edkova KV, Kogan IY, Muller VC, Tapilskaya NI, Krikhely IO, Dzhemlikhanova LK и пр. IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2021 Янв. 1;37(S1):44-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2021.2006526

Author

Ob’edkova, K. V. ; Kogan, I. Y. ; Muller, V. C. ; Tapilskaya, N. I. ; Krikhely, I. O. ; Dzhemlikhanova, L. Kh ; Abdulkadirova, Z. K. ; Mekina, I. D. ; Lesik, E. A. ; Komarova, E. A. ; Ishchuk, M. A. ; Gzgzian, A. M. / IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. в: Gynecological Endocrinology. 2021 ; Том 37, № S1. стр. 44-48.

BibTeX

@article{79fac6e82d994e758c062ec88a70d708,
title = "IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode",
abstract = "Investigation objective: IVF protocol efficacy estimation in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. Materials and technique: A randomized controlled study embracing results of 51 IVF cycle in women with ovary suboptimal response. The suboptimal response prognostic analysis was performed basing on ≤9 oocyte cumulus complexes obtained in previous IVF programs, the presence of no less than 5–9 antral follicles in both oocytes and amount of anti-Mullerian Hormone ≥0,8 ng/mL. In Group I (n = 25), the stimulation was performed by recombinant corifollitropin alfa combined with highly purified urinary gonadotropin, while in Group II (n = 26) it was made by means of recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa within the protocol of applying gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Results: The total gonadotropin dose in Group II patients was authentically lower compared to Group I (p˂,01). No statistical difference between the two studied groups was detected concerning the number of obtained oocytes, 2pn zygote, good-quality transferred embryos and clinical pregnancy rate (p>.05). Embryo cryopreservation was performed only for group-II patients. Conclusion: Corifollitropin alfa administration combined with highly purified menotropin in IVF cycles for suboptimal responders is quite effective, however, this strategy has no preference over other stimulation modes. The strategy of using recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa can be promotive to IVF outcomes for suboptimal responders by means of embryo banking. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03177538.",
keywords = "Corifollitropin alfa, infertility, IVF, suboptimal ovarian response",
author = "Ob{\textquoteright}edkova, {K. V.} and Kogan, {I. Y.} and Muller, {V. C.} and Tapilskaya, {N. I.} and Krikhely, {I. O.} and Dzhemlikhanova, {L. Kh} and Abdulkadirova, {Z. K.} and Mekina, {I. D.} and Lesik, {E. A.} and Komarova, {E. A.} and Ishchuk, {M. A.} and Gzgzian, {A. M.}",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09513590.2021.2006526",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "44--48",
journal = "Gynecological Endocrinology",
issn = "0951-3590",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "S1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode

AU - Ob’edkova, K. V.

AU - Kogan, I. Y.

AU - Muller, V. C.

AU - Tapilskaya, N. I.

AU - Krikhely, I. O.

AU - Dzhemlikhanova, L. Kh

AU - Abdulkadirova, Z. K.

AU - Mekina, I. D.

AU - Lesik, E. A.

AU - Komarova, E. A.

AU - Ishchuk, M. A.

AU - Gzgzian, A. M.

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - Investigation objective: IVF protocol efficacy estimation in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. Materials and technique: A randomized controlled study embracing results of 51 IVF cycle in women with ovary suboptimal response. The suboptimal response prognostic analysis was performed basing on ≤9 oocyte cumulus complexes obtained in previous IVF programs, the presence of no less than 5–9 antral follicles in both oocytes and amount of anti-Mullerian Hormone ≥0,8 ng/mL. In Group I (n = 25), the stimulation was performed by recombinant corifollitropin alfa combined with highly purified urinary gonadotropin, while in Group II (n = 26) it was made by means of recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa within the protocol of applying gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Results: The total gonadotropin dose in Group II patients was authentically lower compared to Group I (p˂,01). No statistical difference between the two studied groups was detected concerning the number of obtained oocytes, 2pn zygote, good-quality transferred embryos and clinical pregnancy rate (p>.05). Embryo cryopreservation was performed only for group-II patients. Conclusion: Corifollitropin alfa administration combined with highly purified menotropin in IVF cycles for suboptimal responders is quite effective, however, this strategy has no preference over other stimulation modes. The strategy of using recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa can be promotive to IVF outcomes for suboptimal responders by means of embryo banking. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03177538.

AB - Investigation objective: IVF protocol efficacy estimation in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. Materials and technique: A randomized controlled study embracing results of 51 IVF cycle in women with ovary suboptimal response. The suboptimal response prognostic analysis was performed basing on ≤9 oocyte cumulus complexes obtained in previous IVF programs, the presence of no less than 5–9 antral follicles in both oocytes and amount of anti-Mullerian Hormone ≥0,8 ng/mL. In Group I (n = 25), the stimulation was performed by recombinant corifollitropin alfa combined with highly purified urinary gonadotropin, while in Group II (n = 26) it was made by means of recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa within the protocol of applying gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Results: The total gonadotropin dose in Group II patients was authentically lower compared to Group I (p˂,01). No statistical difference between the two studied groups was detected concerning the number of obtained oocytes, 2pn zygote, good-quality transferred embryos and clinical pregnancy rate (p>.05). Embryo cryopreservation was performed only for group-II patients. Conclusion: Corifollitropin alfa administration combined with highly purified menotropin in IVF cycles for suboptimal responders is quite effective, however, this strategy has no preference over other stimulation modes. The strategy of using recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa can be promotive to IVF outcomes for suboptimal responders by means of embryo banking. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03177538.

KW - Corifollitropin alfa

KW - infertility

KW - IVF

KW - suboptimal ovarian response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121691589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09513590.2021.2006526

DO - 10.1080/09513590.2021.2006526

M3 - Article

C2 - 34937512

AN - SCOPUS:85121691589

VL - 37

SP - 44

EP - 48

JO - Gynecological Endocrinology

JF - Gynecological Endocrinology

SN - 0951-3590

IS - S1

ER -

ID: 149705643