Standard

Intellectual competition as technology for professional training of managers: GSOM experience. / Minina, Vera; Nikitina, Irina.

в: Journal of Management Development, Том 31, № 3, 2012, стр. 263-274.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья

Harvard

Minina, V & Nikitina, I 2012, 'Intellectual competition as technology for professional training of managers: GSOM experience', Journal of Management Development, Том. 31, № 3, стр. 263-274. <http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0262-1711&volume=31&issue=3&articleid=17021076&show=abstract>

APA

Minina, V., & Nikitina, I. (2012). Intellectual competition as technology for professional training of managers: GSOM experience. Journal of Management Development, 31(3), 263-274. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0262-1711&volume=31&issue=3&articleid=17021076&show=abstract

Vancouver

Minina V, Nikitina I. Intellectual competition as technology for professional training of managers: GSOM experience. Journal of Management Development. 2012;31(3):263-274.

Author

Minina, Vera ; Nikitina, Irina. / Intellectual competition as technology for professional training of managers: GSOM experience. в: Journal of Management Development. 2012 ; Том 31, № 3. стр. 263-274.

BibTeX

@article{4df112376f8a4f029b95ddfe5d9d14c7,
title = "Intellectual competition as technology for professional training of managers: GSOM experience",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss educational technologies that meet modern requirements for training and retraining managers. The authors demonstrate the potential of interactive learning technologies in the development of independent thinking of graduates as an example of implementation of Graduate School of Management (GSOM), St Petersburg University, educational programs. Design/methodology/approach – The data in this paper are drawn from a survey by the authors in 2010 of students attending the programs for executives in GSOM (n=49). Findings – The survey reported that intellectual competitions contribute to achieving independence of participants thinking. The most popular intellectual competitions methods are panel discussion (first place); simulation games with varying roles (team-consultant and team-client) and case studies (second place), and modeling professional situations with limited information in writing and calculations (third place). Research limitations and implications",
keywords = "Active training methods, Business education, Intellectual competition, Interactive technologies, Management development, Managers, Retraining, Russia, Teaching style, Training methods",
author = "Vera Minina and Irina Nikitina",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "263--274",
journal = "Journal of Management Development",
issn = "0262-1711",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intellectual competition as technology for professional training of managers: GSOM experience

AU - Minina, Vera

AU - Nikitina, Irina

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss educational technologies that meet modern requirements for training and retraining managers. The authors demonstrate the potential of interactive learning technologies in the development of independent thinking of graduates as an example of implementation of Graduate School of Management (GSOM), St Petersburg University, educational programs. Design/methodology/approach – The data in this paper are drawn from a survey by the authors in 2010 of students attending the programs for executives in GSOM (n=49). Findings – The survey reported that intellectual competitions contribute to achieving independence of participants thinking. The most popular intellectual competitions methods are panel discussion (first place); simulation games with varying roles (team-consultant and team-client) and case studies (second place), and modeling professional situations with limited information in writing and calculations (third place). Research limitations and implications

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss educational technologies that meet modern requirements for training and retraining managers. The authors demonstrate the potential of interactive learning technologies in the development of independent thinking of graduates as an example of implementation of Graduate School of Management (GSOM), St Petersburg University, educational programs. Design/methodology/approach – The data in this paper are drawn from a survey by the authors in 2010 of students attending the programs for executives in GSOM (n=49). Findings – The survey reported that intellectual competitions contribute to achieving independence of participants thinking. The most popular intellectual competitions methods are panel discussion (first place); simulation games with varying roles (team-consultant and team-client) and case studies (second place), and modeling professional situations with limited information in writing and calculations (third place). Research limitations and implications

KW - Active training methods

KW - Business education

KW - Intellectual competition

KW - Interactive technologies

KW - Management development

KW - Managers

KW - Retraining

KW - Russia

KW - Teaching style

KW - Training methods

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 263

EP - 274

JO - Journal of Management Development

JF - Journal of Management Development

SN - 0262-1711

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 5330718