Standard

How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible? // FILOZOFIJA I DRUŠTVO XXVI (4), 2015. / Savchuk, Valery.

в: Filozofija i društvo (Philosophy and Society), Том XXVI, № 4, 2015, стр. 893-901.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Savchuk V. How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible? // FILOZOFIJA I DRUŠTVO XXVI (4), 2015. Filozofija i društvo (Philosophy and Society). 2015;XXVI(4):893-901.

Author

Savchuk, Valery. / How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible? // FILOZOFIJA I DRUŠTVO XXVI (4), 2015. в: Filozofija i društvo (Philosophy and Society). 2015 ; Том XXVI, № 4. стр. 893-901.

BibTeX

@article{f34744c6852242f7a75136c0e0762e71,
title = "How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible? // FILOZOFIJA I DRU{\v S}TVO XXVI (4), 2015.",
abstract = "This paper focuses on the following question: how is philosophy of anything possible? Where lies the boundary of specialisation area beyond which the term “philosophy” loses not only its strength, but also its meaning? When we talk about specific genre, for example, graphic art or sculpture we use the term “philosophy” in a broader, metaphorical sense. Why then should philosophy of photography be any different? All of the abovementioned questions are discussed in the present article. Philosophy of photography is, indeed, a legitimate discipline, just as philosophy of language, philosophy of science and technology and philosophy of politics are. Keywords Photography, visual image, iconic turn, language of media",
keywords = "Photography, visual image, iconic turn, language of media",
author = "Valery Savchuk",
year = "2015",
language = "не определен",
volume = "XXVI",
pages = "893--901",
journal = "Filozofija i Drustvo",
issn = "0353-5738",
publisher = "Institut za Filozofiju i Drustvenu Teoriju Beograd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible? // FILOZOFIJA I DRUŠTVO XXVI (4), 2015.

AU - Savchuk, Valery

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper focuses on the following question: how is philosophy of anything possible? Where lies the boundary of specialisation area beyond which the term “philosophy” loses not only its strength, but also its meaning? When we talk about specific genre, for example, graphic art or sculpture we use the term “philosophy” in a broader, metaphorical sense. Why then should philosophy of photography be any different? All of the abovementioned questions are discussed in the present article. Philosophy of photography is, indeed, a legitimate discipline, just as philosophy of language, philosophy of science and technology and philosophy of politics are. Keywords Photography, visual image, iconic turn, language of media

AB - This paper focuses on the following question: how is philosophy of anything possible? Where lies the boundary of specialisation area beyond which the term “philosophy” loses not only its strength, but also its meaning? When we talk about specific genre, for example, graphic art or sculpture we use the term “philosophy” in a broader, metaphorical sense. Why then should philosophy of photography be any different? All of the abovementioned questions are discussed in the present article. Philosophy of photography is, indeed, a legitimate discipline, just as philosophy of language, philosophy of science and technology and philosophy of politics are. Keywords Photography, visual image, iconic turn, language of media

KW - Photography

KW - visual image

KW - iconic turn

KW - language of media

M3 - статья

VL - XXVI

SP - 893

EP - 901

JO - Filozofija i Drustvo

JF - Filozofija i Drustvo

SN - 0353-5738

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 5812562