Standard

Historical review on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa. / Ostrovsky, A.N.; Shunatova, N.N.; Antipenko, I.I.

Annals of bryozoology: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans. ред. / Patrick N. Wyse Jackson; Mary Spencer Jones. International Bryozoology Association, 2002. стр. 201-228.

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборнике

Harvard

Ostrovsky, AN, Shunatova, NN & Antipenko, II 2002, Historical review on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa. в PN Wyse Jackson & M Spencer Jones (ред.), Annals of bryozoology: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans. International Bryozoology Association, стр. 201-228.

APA

Ostrovsky, A. N., Shunatova, N. N., & Antipenko, I. I. (2002). Historical review on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa. в P. N. Wyse Jackson, & M. Spencer Jones (Ред.), Annals of bryozoology: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans (стр. 201-228). International Bryozoology Association.

Vancouver

Ostrovsky AN, Shunatova NN, Antipenko II. Historical review on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa. в Wyse Jackson PN, Spencer Jones M, Редакторы, Annals of bryozoology: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans. International Bryozoology Association. 2002. стр. 201-228

Author

Ostrovsky, A.N. ; Shunatova, N.N. ; Antipenko, I.I. / Historical review on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa. Annals of bryozoology: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans. Редактор / Patrick N. Wyse Jackson ; Mary Spencer Jones. International Bryozoology Association, 2002. стр. 201-228

BibTeX

@inbook{00b401e6da5f4bd8b049c00babbacdc5,
title = "Historical review on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa.",
abstract = "During our studies on bryozoan autozooidal behaviour, we, following Winston, realized that {\textquoteleft}the 19th [as well as 18th] century knowledge of individual (polypide) behaviour was never codified{\textquoteright}. This negligence in respect to the work of the old authors led to two main consequences. Firstly, the names of many brilliant naturalists, whose observations and detailed descriptions were, as a rule, perfect and whose results are the basement of modern knowledge, were either undeservedly forgotten or mentioned only in passing. Secondly, {\textquoteleft}double work{\textquoteright} was carried out since many of previously recorded phenomena and structures were newly redescribed, which is intimately connected with the problem of scientific priority. So, this paper was written with the aim to correct the situation in question at least partially. We present a historical survey on the development of views on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa, with the emphasis on the priority in the recording of one or other type of activities and feeding/sensory structures.",
author = "A.N. Ostrovsky and N.N. Shunatova and I.I. Antipenko",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780954364403",
pages = "201--228",
editor = "{Wyse Jackson}, {Patrick N.} and {Spencer Jones}, Mary",
booktitle = "Annals of bryozoology: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans",
publisher = "International Bryozoology Association",
address = "International organisation",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Historical review on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa.

AU - Ostrovsky, A.N.

AU - Shunatova, N.N.

AU - Antipenko, I.I.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - During our studies on bryozoan autozooidal behaviour, we, following Winston, realized that ‘the 19th [as well as 18th] century knowledge of individual (polypide) behaviour was never codified’. This negligence in respect to the work of the old authors led to two main consequences. Firstly, the names of many brilliant naturalists, whose observations and detailed descriptions were, as a rule, perfect and whose results are the basement of modern knowledge, were either undeservedly forgotten or mentioned only in passing. Secondly, ‘double work’ was carried out since many of previously recorded phenomena and structures were newly redescribed, which is intimately connected with the problem of scientific priority. So, this paper was written with the aim to correct the situation in question at least partially. We present a historical survey on the development of views on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa, with the emphasis on the priority in the recording of one or other type of activities and feeding/sensory structures.

AB - During our studies on bryozoan autozooidal behaviour, we, following Winston, realized that ‘the 19th [as well as 18th] century knowledge of individual (polypide) behaviour was never codified’. This negligence in respect to the work of the old authors led to two main consequences. Firstly, the names of many brilliant naturalists, whose observations and detailed descriptions were, as a rule, perfect and whose results are the basement of modern knowledge, were either undeservedly forgotten or mentioned only in passing. Secondly, ‘double work’ was carried out since many of previously recorded phenomena and structures were newly redescribed, which is intimately connected with the problem of scientific priority. So, this paper was written with the aim to correct the situation in question at least partially. We present a historical survey on the development of views on individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding mechanisms in Bryozoa, with the emphasis on the priority in the recording of one or other type of activities and feeding/sensory structures.

M3 - Article in an anthology

SN - 9780954364403

SP - 201

EP - 228

BT - Annals of bryozoology: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans

A2 - Wyse Jackson, Patrick N.

A2 - Spencer Jones, Mary

PB - International Bryozoology Association

ER -

ID: 4409001