Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
G Factor of Lithiumlike Silicon and Calcium: Resolving the Disagreement between Theory and Experiment. / Kosheleva, V. P.; Volotka, A. V.; Glazov, D. A.; Zinenko, D. V.; Fritzsche, S.
в: Physical Review Letters, Том 128, № 1, 103001, 09.03.2022.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - G Factor of Lithiumlike Silicon and Calcium: Resolving the Disagreement between Theory and Experiment
AU - Kosheleva, V. P.
AU - Volotka, A. V.
AU - Glazov, D. A.
AU - Zinenko, D. V.
AU - Fritzsche, S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Physical Society.
PY - 2022/3/9
Y1 - 2022/3/9
N2 - The bound-electron g factor is a stringent tool for tests of the standard model and the search for new physics. The comparison between an experiment on the g factor of lithiumlike silicon and the two recent theoretical values revealed the discrepancies of 1.7σ [Glazov et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 173001 (2019)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.123.173001] and 5.2σ [Yerokhin et al. Phys. Rev. A 102, 022815 (2020)PLRAAN2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.102.022815]. To identify the reason for this disagreement, we accomplish large-scale high-precision computation of the interelectronic-interaction and many-electron QED corrections. The calculations are performed within the extended Furry picture of QED, and the dependence of the final values on the choice of the binding potential is carefully analyzed. As a result, we significantly improve the agreement between the theory and experiment for the g factor of lithiumlike silicon. We also report the most accurate theoretical prediction to date for lithiumlike calcium, which perfectly agrees with the experimental value.
AB - The bound-electron g factor is a stringent tool for tests of the standard model and the search for new physics. The comparison between an experiment on the g factor of lithiumlike silicon and the two recent theoretical values revealed the discrepancies of 1.7σ [Glazov et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 173001 (2019)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.123.173001] and 5.2σ [Yerokhin et al. Phys. Rev. A 102, 022815 (2020)PLRAAN2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.102.022815]. To identify the reason for this disagreement, we accomplish large-scale high-precision computation of the interelectronic-interaction and many-electron QED corrections. The calculations are performed within the extended Furry picture of QED, and the dependence of the final values on the choice of the binding potential is carefully analyzed. As a result, we significantly improve the agreement between the theory and experiment for the g factor of lithiumlike silicon. We also report the most accurate theoretical prediction to date for lithiumlike calcium, which perfectly agrees with the experimental value.
KW - ELECTRON G-FACTOR
KW - BOUND-ELECTRON
KW - RADIATIVE-CORRECTIONS
KW - MOMENT
KW - MASS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126645393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/02bf4558-fbaa-3396-9dcc-19a53cb1480e/
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.103001
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.103001
M3 - Article
C2 - 35333066
AN - SCOPUS:85126645393
VL - 128
JO - Physical Review Letters
JF - Physical Review Letters
SN - 0031-9007
IS - 1
M1 - 103001
ER -
ID: 94411011