Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
From Uncertainty to Trust: COVID-19 Pandemic Responses of South Korea and Sweden. / Трегубова, Наталья Дамировна; Резаев, Андрей Владимирович; Иванова, Анастасия Андреевна.
в: Changing Societies and Personalities, Том 6, № 1, 79, 11.04.2022, стр. 79-97.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - From Uncertainty to Trust: COVID-19 Pandemic Responses of South Korea and Sweden
AU - Трегубова, Наталья Дамировна
AU - Резаев, Андрей Владимирович
AU - Иванова, Анастасия Андреевна
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Andrey V. Rezaev, Natalia D. Tregubova, Anastasia A. Ivanova.
PY - 2022/4/11
Y1 - 2022/4/11
N2 - Epidemiological situations, such as the pandemic of COVID-19, pose a clear and significant problem for the states in their efforts to construct and to control their population. The widespread introduction of a lockdown as a regulatory method during the current pandemic could be associated with the need to preserve an understandable, quantifiable, and predictable management object. This paper considers, analyses, and compares two deviant cases of COVID-19 pandemic responses: South Korea and Sweden. In South Korea, the pandemic regulations were dominated by large-scale testing and contact tracing, while lockdown policies have played a supplementary role. Sweden’s attempt to develop population immunity by introducing less stringent measures that its neighbours has attracted much attention worldwide. The authors conduct desk research and analyse secondary data on pandemic regulations and their effects in these two countries in 2020. Similarities and differences between Swedish and South Korean cases are formulated regarding trust inside and between the states.
AB - Epidemiological situations, such as the pandemic of COVID-19, pose a clear and significant problem for the states in their efforts to construct and to control their population. The widespread introduction of a lockdown as a regulatory method during the current pandemic could be associated with the need to preserve an understandable, quantifiable, and predictable management object. This paper considers, analyses, and compares two deviant cases of COVID-19 pandemic responses: South Korea and Sweden. In South Korea, the pandemic regulations were dominated by large-scale testing and contact tracing, while lockdown policies have played a supplementary role. Sweden’s attempt to develop population immunity by introducing less stringent measures that its neighbours has attracted much attention worldwide. The authors conduct desk research and analyse secondary data on pandemic regulations and their effects in these two countries in 2020. Similarities and differences between Swedish and South Korean cases are formulated regarding trust inside and between the states.
KW - COVID-19
KW - democratization of expertise
KW - healthcare in South Korea
KW - healthcare in Sweden
KW - modern state
KW - pandemic regulations
KW - trust
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/36cf9bd4-21d1-37e3-8849-5e0da499edd2/
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133183301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15826/csp.2022.6.1.164
DO - 10.15826/csp.2022.6.1.164
M3 - Article
VL - 6
SP - 79
EP - 97
JO - Changing Societies and Personalities
JF - Changing Societies and Personalities
SN - 2587-6104
IS - 1
M1 - 79
ER -
ID: 94915902