Standard

EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE THROUGH THE LENS OF MODERN “MEMORY WARS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND INTRASTATE DIMENSIONS. / Дорская, Александра Андреевна; Дорский, Андрей Юрьевич.

в: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПРАВО, Том 14, № 1, 2023, стр. 243-253.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Дорская, АА & Дорский, АЮ 2023, 'EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE THROUGH THE LENS OF MODERN “MEMORY WARS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND INTRASTATE DIMENSIONS', ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПРАВО, Том. 14, № 1, стр. 243-253. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.115

APA

Дорская, А. А., & Дорский, А. Ю. (2023). EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE THROUGH THE LENS OF MODERN “MEMORY WARS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND INTRASTATE DIMENSIONS. ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПРАВО, 14(1), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.115

Vancouver

Дорская АА, Дорский АЮ. EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE THROUGH THE LENS OF MODERN “MEMORY WARS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND INTRASTATE DIMENSIONS. ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПРАВО. 2023;14(1):243-253. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.115

Author

Дорская, Александра Андреевна ; Дорский, Андрей Юрьевич. / EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE THROUGH THE LENS OF MODERN “MEMORY WARS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND INTRASTATE DIMENSIONS. в: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПРАВО. 2023 ; Том 14, № 1. стр. 243-253.

BibTeX

@article{1ab49dff151d4f658b71b8cb1fe49b4a,
title = "EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE THROUGH THE LENS OF MODERN “MEMORY WARS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND INTRASTATE DIMENSIONS",
abstract = "The article examines how the concept of genocide has evolved at the international and national legal levels, beginning with its origins at the doctrinal level and culminating in international conventions and national regulatory acts. Challenges regarding the definition of genocide and ambiguous interpretation of genocide in relation to crimes against humanity were identified. It is demonstrated that international justice bodies interpret the concept of genocide differently. The study concluded that humanity did not fully utilize the potential of the United Nations and International Criminal Tribunals in order to develop a joint measured approach to assessing historical events, specifically World War II and the genocide in 1939-1945, in the context of actualizing history and triggering memory wars. The positions of states to consolidate the crime of genocide in criminal legislation are considered: compliance with the definition of genocide in international conventions, extension of the list of groups against whose members the genocide can be committed, leaving the list open as to which groups can be included. The preferences of the second option are shown. Examples of states turning to the facts of genocide committed in the past are given (for instance, Armenia towards Turkey, Namibia towards Germany, Poland towards Germany and Russia, Russia towards Germany and its allies during World War II), and it has been suggested that the material responsibility of states cannot be applied to events before 1945, since the desire to avoid it leads to non-recognition of political international-legal responsibility.",
keywords = "genocide, international crime, memory wars, official remembrance policy, self-identification of peoples, self-identification of states",
author = "Дорская, {Александра Андреевна} and Дорский, {Андрей Юрьевич}",
note = "Dorskaia, A.A., Dorskii, A.Yu. Evolution of the concept of genocide through the lens of modern “memory wars”: International legal and intrastate dimensions // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Pravothis link is disabled, 2023, 14(1), P. 243–253.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.21638/spbu14.2023.115",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "243--253",
journal = "ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПРАВО",
issn = "2074-1243",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE THROUGH THE LENS OF MODERN “MEMORY WARS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND INTRASTATE DIMENSIONS

AU - Дорская, Александра Андреевна

AU - Дорский, Андрей Юрьевич

N1 - Dorskaia, A.A., Dorskii, A.Yu. Evolution of the concept of genocide through the lens of modern “memory wars”: International legal and intrastate dimensions // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Pravothis link is disabled, 2023, 14(1), P. 243–253.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The article examines how the concept of genocide has evolved at the international and national legal levels, beginning with its origins at the doctrinal level and culminating in international conventions and national regulatory acts. Challenges regarding the definition of genocide and ambiguous interpretation of genocide in relation to crimes against humanity were identified. It is demonstrated that international justice bodies interpret the concept of genocide differently. The study concluded that humanity did not fully utilize the potential of the United Nations and International Criminal Tribunals in order to develop a joint measured approach to assessing historical events, specifically World War II and the genocide in 1939-1945, in the context of actualizing history and triggering memory wars. The positions of states to consolidate the crime of genocide in criminal legislation are considered: compliance with the definition of genocide in international conventions, extension of the list of groups against whose members the genocide can be committed, leaving the list open as to which groups can be included. The preferences of the second option are shown. Examples of states turning to the facts of genocide committed in the past are given (for instance, Armenia towards Turkey, Namibia towards Germany, Poland towards Germany and Russia, Russia towards Germany and its allies during World War II), and it has been suggested that the material responsibility of states cannot be applied to events before 1945, since the desire to avoid it leads to non-recognition of political international-legal responsibility.

AB - The article examines how the concept of genocide has evolved at the international and national legal levels, beginning with its origins at the doctrinal level and culminating in international conventions and national regulatory acts. Challenges regarding the definition of genocide and ambiguous interpretation of genocide in relation to crimes against humanity were identified. It is demonstrated that international justice bodies interpret the concept of genocide differently. The study concluded that humanity did not fully utilize the potential of the United Nations and International Criminal Tribunals in order to develop a joint measured approach to assessing historical events, specifically World War II and the genocide in 1939-1945, in the context of actualizing history and triggering memory wars. The positions of states to consolidate the crime of genocide in criminal legislation are considered: compliance with the definition of genocide in international conventions, extension of the list of groups against whose members the genocide can be committed, leaving the list open as to which groups can be included. The preferences of the second option are shown. Examples of states turning to the facts of genocide committed in the past are given (for instance, Armenia towards Turkey, Namibia towards Germany, Poland towards Germany and Russia, Russia towards Germany and its allies during World War II), and it has been suggested that the material responsibility of states cannot be applied to events before 1945, since the desire to avoid it leads to non-recognition of political international-legal responsibility.

KW - genocide

KW - international crime

KW - memory wars

KW - official remembrance policy

KW - self-identification of peoples

KW - self-identification of states

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/090e4153-45c1-3a38-b956-5afd30697f45/

U2 - 10.21638/spbu14.2023.115

DO - 10.21638/spbu14.2023.115

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 243

EP - 253

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПРАВО

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПРАВО

SN - 2074-1243

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 113774874