Standard

Evaluation of low-dose CT implementation for lung cancer screening in a general practice hospital. / Karostik, D. V.; Kamyshanskaya, I. G.; Cheremisin, V. M.; Drozdov, A. A.; Vodovatov, A. V.

в: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Том 967, № 1, 012006, 15.02.2018.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья в журнале по материалам конференции › Рецензирование

Harvard

Karostik, DV, Kamyshanskaya, IG, Cheremisin, VM, Drozdov, AA & Vodovatov, AV 2018, 'Evaluation of low-dose CT implementation for lung cancer screening in a general practice hospital', Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Том. 967, № 1, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/967/1/012006

APA

Karostik, D. V., Kamyshanskaya, I. G., Cheremisin, V. M., Drozdov, A. A., & Vodovatov, A. V. (2018). Evaluation of low-dose CT implementation for lung cancer screening in a general practice hospital. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 967(1), [012006]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/967/1/012006

Vancouver

Karostik DV, Kamyshanskaya IG, Cheremisin VM, Drozdov AA, Vodovatov AV. Evaluation of low-dose CT implementation for lung cancer screening in a general practice hospital. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018 Февр. 15;967(1). 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/967/1/012006

Author

Karostik, D. V. ; Kamyshanskaya, I. G. ; Cheremisin, V. M. ; Drozdov, A. A. ; Vodovatov, A. V. / Evaluation of low-dose CT implementation for lung cancer screening in a general practice hospital. в: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018 ; Том 967, № 1.

BibTeX

@article{f39994a17212482494e4517d1327202c,
title = "Evaluation of low-dose CT implementation for lung cancer screening in a general practice hospital",
abstract = "The aim of the current study was to evaluate the possibility of the implementation of LDCT for the screening for lung cancer and tuberculosis in a typical general hospital practice. Diagnostic and economic effectiveness, patient doses and the corresponding radiation risks for LDCT were compared with the existing digital chest screening radiography. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of LDCT allowed verifying false-positive cases or providing additional excessive diagnostic information, but did not significantly improve the sensitivity of screening. Per capita costs for LDCT were higher compared to digital radiography up to a factor of 12; corresponding radiation risk - by a factor of 4. Hence, it was considered unjustified to implement LDCT in a general practice hospital.",
author = "Karostik, {D. V.} and Kamyshanskaya, {I. G.} and Cheremisin, {V. M.} and Drozdov, {A. A.} and Vodovatov, {A. V.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; 4th International Conference on X-Ray and Electrovacuum Technique: New Ideas and Developments ; Conference date: 23-11-2017 Through 24-11-2017",
year = "2018",
month = feb,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/967/1/012006",
language = "English",
volume = "967",
journal = "Journal of Physics: Conference Series",
issn = "1742-6588",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of low-dose CT implementation for lung cancer screening in a general practice hospital

AU - Karostik, D. V.

AU - Kamyshanskaya, I. G.

AU - Cheremisin, V. M.

AU - Drozdov, A. A.

AU - Vodovatov, A. V.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/2/15

Y1 - 2018/2/15

N2 - The aim of the current study was to evaluate the possibility of the implementation of LDCT for the screening for lung cancer and tuberculosis in a typical general hospital practice. Diagnostic and economic effectiveness, patient doses and the corresponding radiation risks for LDCT were compared with the existing digital chest screening radiography. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of LDCT allowed verifying false-positive cases or providing additional excessive diagnostic information, but did not significantly improve the sensitivity of screening. Per capita costs for LDCT were higher compared to digital radiography up to a factor of 12; corresponding radiation risk - by a factor of 4. Hence, it was considered unjustified to implement LDCT in a general practice hospital.

AB - The aim of the current study was to evaluate the possibility of the implementation of LDCT for the screening for lung cancer and tuberculosis in a typical general hospital practice. Diagnostic and economic effectiveness, patient doses and the corresponding radiation risks for LDCT were compared with the existing digital chest screening radiography. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of LDCT allowed verifying false-positive cases or providing additional excessive diagnostic information, but did not significantly improve the sensitivity of screening. Per capita costs for LDCT were higher compared to digital radiography up to a factor of 12; corresponding radiation risk - by a factor of 4. Hence, it was considered unjustified to implement LDCT in a general practice hospital.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043254409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/967/1/012006

DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/967/1/012006

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85043254409

VL - 967

JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

SN - 1742-6588

IS - 1

M1 - 012006

T2 - 4th International Conference on X-Ray and Electrovacuum Technique: New Ideas and Developments

Y2 - 23 November 2017 through 24 November 2017

ER -

ID: 74574066