Standard

Effects of Indigenous Enterococci on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Behavior of Rats on Correction of Experimental Dysbiosis. / Ermolenko, E.I.; Abdurasulova , I.; Kotyleva , M.; Suvoov , A.

в: Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, Том 48, № № 4, 01.05.2018, стр. 496-505.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Ermolenko, EI, Abdurasulova , I, Kotyleva , M & Suvoov , A 2018, 'Effects of Indigenous Enterococci on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Behavior of Rats on Correction of Experimental Dysbiosis', Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, Том. 48, № № 4, стр. 496-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-018-0591-7

APA

Vancouver

Author

Ermolenko, E.I. ; Abdurasulova , I. ; Kotyleva , M. ; Suvoov , A. / Effects of Indigenous Enterococci on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Behavior of Rats on Correction of Experimental Dysbiosis. в: Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology. 2018 ; Том 48, № № 4. стр. 496-505.

BibTeX

@article{24901c95fc6944db85faac5cc794f567,
title = "Effects of Indigenous Enterococci on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Behavior of Rats on Correction of Experimental Dysbiosis",
abstract = "Autoprobiotic (indigenous) strains of Enterococcus faecium used in the correction of experimental intestinal dysbiosis, in contrast to probiotic E. faecium strain L-3, had a marked bifidogenic effect, preserved the populations of Escherichia, and inhibited the growth of Proteus, but had a relatively low antagonistic activity in relation to Klebsiella. Administration of autoprobiotics (A) and probiotic (P) led to faster disappearance of the symptoms of dyspepsia as compared with the control group of rats (C1) in which dysbiosis was not corrected. Animals from subgroup A1 were given A, whose genomes contained a large number of pathogenicity genes, including cytolysins and hyaluronidase. Investigations using the open field test identified various behavioral reactions to correction of dysbiosis. Animals of subgroup A1 showed suppression of movement and orientational-investigative activity. In the second group of rats (subgroup A2), movement and orientational-investigative activity was comparable with that in control group C2 (without induction of dysbiosis), as after use of P. These characteristics of the effects of autoprobiotic enterococci on the intestinal microbiota and the body support the existence of an intestinal microbiome–brain axis.",
keywords = "autoprobiotics, behavior, dysbiosis, enterococci, microbiota, probiotics",
author = "E.I. Ermolenko and I. Abdurasulova and M. Kotyleva and A. Suvoov",
note = "Funding Information: This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 16-15-10085).",
year = "2018",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11055-018-0591-7",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "496--505",
journal = "Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology",
issn = "0097-0549",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "№ 4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Indigenous Enterococci on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Behavior of Rats on Correction of Experimental Dysbiosis

AU - Ermolenko, E.I.

AU - Abdurasulova , I.

AU - Kotyleva , M.

AU - Suvoov , A.

N1 - Funding Information: This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 16-15-10085).

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Autoprobiotic (indigenous) strains of Enterococcus faecium used in the correction of experimental intestinal dysbiosis, in contrast to probiotic E. faecium strain L-3, had a marked bifidogenic effect, preserved the populations of Escherichia, and inhibited the growth of Proteus, but had a relatively low antagonistic activity in relation to Klebsiella. Administration of autoprobiotics (A) and probiotic (P) led to faster disappearance of the symptoms of dyspepsia as compared with the control group of rats (C1) in which dysbiosis was not corrected. Animals from subgroup A1 were given A, whose genomes contained a large number of pathogenicity genes, including cytolysins and hyaluronidase. Investigations using the open field test identified various behavioral reactions to correction of dysbiosis. Animals of subgroup A1 showed suppression of movement and orientational-investigative activity. In the second group of rats (subgroup A2), movement and orientational-investigative activity was comparable with that in control group C2 (without induction of dysbiosis), as after use of P. These characteristics of the effects of autoprobiotic enterococci on the intestinal microbiota and the body support the existence of an intestinal microbiome–brain axis.

AB - Autoprobiotic (indigenous) strains of Enterococcus faecium used in the correction of experimental intestinal dysbiosis, in contrast to probiotic E. faecium strain L-3, had a marked bifidogenic effect, preserved the populations of Escherichia, and inhibited the growth of Proteus, but had a relatively low antagonistic activity in relation to Klebsiella. Administration of autoprobiotics (A) and probiotic (P) led to faster disappearance of the symptoms of dyspepsia as compared with the control group of rats (C1) in which dysbiosis was not corrected. Animals from subgroup A1 were given A, whose genomes contained a large number of pathogenicity genes, including cytolysins and hyaluronidase. Investigations using the open field test identified various behavioral reactions to correction of dysbiosis. Animals of subgroup A1 showed suppression of movement and orientational-investigative activity. In the second group of rats (subgroup A2), movement and orientational-investigative activity was comparable with that in control group C2 (without induction of dysbiosis), as after use of P. These characteristics of the effects of autoprobiotic enterococci on the intestinal microbiota and the body support the existence of an intestinal microbiome–brain axis.

KW - autoprobiotics

KW - behavior

KW - dysbiosis

KW - enterococci

KW - microbiota

KW - probiotics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045908343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11055-018-0591-7

DO - 10.1007/s11055-018-0591-7

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 496

EP - 505

JO - Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

JF - Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

SN - 0097-0549

IS - № 4

ER -

ID: 27950758