Standard

Diagnostics of Closed Magnetic Flux Depletion in the Near-Earth Magnetotail During the Substorm Growth Phase. / Shukhtina, M. A.; Gordeev, E. I.; Sergeev, V. A.; Shinohara, I.

в: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, Том 123, № 10, 01.10.2018, стр. 8377-8389.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Shukhtina, M. A. ; Gordeev, E. I. ; Sergeev, V. A. ; Shinohara, I. / Diagnostics of Closed Magnetic Flux Depletion in the Near-Earth Magnetotail During the Substorm Growth Phase. в: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS. 2018 ; Том 123, № 10. стр. 8377-8389.

BibTeX

@article{55656f0626a74e56acb4242d27347d70,
title = "Diagnostics of Closed Magnetic Flux Depletion in the Near-Earth Magnetotail During the Substorm Growth Phase",
abstract = "Based on magnetohydrodynamics simulations, it was recently suggested that magnetotail reconfiguration during the substorm growth phase results from combined action of two large-scale processes: (1) open magnetic flux accumulation (OMFA) in the tail lobes and (2) closed magnetic flux depletion (CMFD) in the near-Earth tail, caused by flux evacuation to the dayside magnetopause. Simultaneous action of uniform along the tail OMFA and strongly nonuniform CMFD leads to different rates of magnetic flux growth in different tail cross sections. According to Global magnetohydrodynamics simulations CMFD is about 35% of OMFA, the corresponding differences of magnetic flux increase in two-tail cross sections at −7R E and −20R E being as large as 0.1–0.2 GWb. To study this effect on real data, we applied the recent method of magnetotail flux estimation (Shukhtina et al.,) to simultaneous Cluster and Geotail observations in the tail lobes. By finding such rare observations in the inner and middle magnetotail (at<X > −10 R E and − 21R E) we confirm a larger magnetic flux increase in the midtail, with the ratio between OMFA and CMFD comparable to that obtained in magnetohydrodynamics, although with a large scatter. These results confirm the scenario of two decoupled magnetotail regions with different convection regimes during the growth phase. Convection is depressed in the midtail plasma sheet, showing the pressure crisis in action inherent to tail-like 2-D magnetic configuration. At the same time convection is substantially enhanced in the inner magnetosphere, where the pressure crisis is solved due to azimuthal flux transport around the Earth, essentially a 3-D effect. ",
keywords = "substorm, growth phase, magnetotail, magnetic flux, THIN CURRENT SHEETS, PLASMA SHEET, STATISTICAL VISUALIZATION",
author = "Shukhtina, {M. A.} and Gordeev, {E. I.} and Sergeev, {V. A.} and I. Shinohara",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2018JA025979",
language = "Английский",
volume = "123",
pages = "8377--8389",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostics of Closed Magnetic Flux Depletion in the Near-Earth Magnetotail During the Substorm Growth Phase

AU - Shukhtina, M. A.

AU - Gordeev, E. I.

AU - Sergeev, V. A.

AU - Shinohara, I.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Based on magnetohydrodynamics simulations, it was recently suggested that magnetotail reconfiguration during the substorm growth phase results from combined action of two large-scale processes: (1) open magnetic flux accumulation (OMFA) in the tail lobes and (2) closed magnetic flux depletion (CMFD) in the near-Earth tail, caused by flux evacuation to the dayside magnetopause. Simultaneous action of uniform along the tail OMFA and strongly nonuniform CMFD leads to different rates of magnetic flux growth in different tail cross sections. According to Global magnetohydrodynamics simulations CMFD is about 35% of OMFA, the corresponding differences of magnetic flux increase in two-tail cross sections at −7R E and −20R E being as large as 0.1–0.2 GWb. To study this effect on real data, we applied the recent method of magnetotail flux estimation (Shukhtina et al.,) to simultaneous Cluster and Geotail observations in the tail lobes. By finding such rare observations in the inner and middle magnetotail (at<X > −10 R E and − 21R E) we confirm a larger magnetic flux increase in the midtail, with the ratio between OMFA and CMFD comparable to that obtained in magnetohydrodynamics, although with a large scatter. These results confirm the scenario of two decoupled magnetotail regions with different convection regimes during the growth phase. Convection is depressed in the midtail plasma sheet, showing the pressure crisis in action inherent to tail-like 2-D magnetic configuration. At the same time convection is substantially enhanced in the inner magnetosphere, where the pressure crisis is solved due to azimuthal flux transport around the Earth, essentially a 3-D effect.

AB - Based on magnetohydrodynamics simulations, it was recently suggested that magnetotail reconfiguration during the substorm growth phase results from combined action of two large-scale processes: (1) open magnetic flux accumulation (OMFA) in the tail lobes and (2) closed magnetic flux depletion (CMFD) in the near-Earth tail, caused by flux evacuation to the dayside magnetopause. Simultaneous action of uniform along the tail OMFA and strongly nonuniform CMFD leads to different rates of magnetic flux growth in different tail cross sections. According to Global magnetohydrodynamics simulations CMFD is about 35% of OMFA, the corresponding differences of magnetic flux increase in two-tail cross sections at −7R E and −20R E being as large as 0.1–0.2 GWb. To study this effect on real data, we applied the recent method of magnetotail flux estimation (Shukhtina et al.,) to simultaneous Cluster and Geotail observations in the tail lobes. By finding such rare observations in the inner and middle magnetotail (at<X > −10 R E and − 21R E) we confirm a larger magnetic flux increase in the midtail, with the ratio between OMFA and CMFD comparable to that obtained in magnetohydrodynamics, although with a large scatter. These results confirm the scenario of two decoupled magnetotail regions with different convection regimes during the growth phase. Convection is depressed in the midtail plasma sheet, showing the pressure crisis in action inherent to tail-like 2-D magnetic configuration. At the same time convection is substantially enhanced in the inner magnetosphere, where the pressure crisis is solved due to azimuthal flux transport around the Earth, essentially a 3-D effect.

KW - substorm

KW - growth phase

KW - magnetotail

KW - magnetic flux

KW - THIN CURRENT SHEETS

KW - PLASMA SHEET

KW - STATISTICAL VISUALIZATION

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055687667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/diagnostics-closed-magnetic-flux-depletion-nearearth-magnetotail-during-substorm-growth-phase

U2 - 10.1029/2018JA025979

DO - 10.1029/2018JA025979

M3 - статья

VL - 123

SP - 8377

EP - 8389

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 36759308