Standard

Denervation of the distal renal arterial branches vs. conventional main renal artery treatment : a randomized controlled trial for treatment of resistant hypertension. / Pekarskiy, Stanislav E; Baev, Andrei E; Mordovin, Victor F; Semke, Galina V; Ripp, Tatyana M; Falkovskaya, Alla U; Lichikaki, Valeria A; Sitkova, Ekaterina S; Zubanova, Irina V; Popov, Sergei V.

в: Journal of Hypertension, Том 35, № 2, 02.2017, стр. 369-375.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Pekarskiy, SE, Baev, AE, Mordovin, VF, Semke, GV, Ripp, TM, Falkovskaya, AU, Lichikaki, VA, Sitkova, ES, Zubanova, IV & Popov, SV 2017, 'Denervation of the distal renal arterial branches vs. conventional main renal artery treatment: a randomized controlled trial for treatment of resistant hypertension', Journal of Hypertension, Том. 35, № 2, стр. 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001160

APA

Pekarskiy, S. E., Baev, A. E., Mordovin, V. F., Semke, G. V., Ripp, T. M., Falkovskaya, A. U., Lichikaki, V. A., Sitkova, E. S., Zubanova, I. V., & Popov, S. V. (2017). Denervation of the distal renal arterial branches vs. conventional main renal artery treatment: a randomized controlled trial for treatment of resistant hypertension. Journal of Hypertension, 35(2), 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001160

Vancouver

Author

Pekarskiy, Stanislav E ; Baev, Andrei E ; Mordovin, Victor F ; Semke, Galina V ; Ripp, Tatyana M ; Falkovskaya, Alla U ; Lichikaki, Valeria A ; Sitkova, Ekaterina S ; Zubanova, Irina V ; Popov, Sergei V. / Denervation of the distal renal arterial branches vs. conventional main renal artery treatment : a randomized controlled trial for treatment of resistant hypertension. в: Journal of Hypertension. 2017 ; Том 35, № 2. стр. 369-375.

BibTeX

@article{79767562c8574759a34c0fb2ce30eb83,
title = "Denervation of the distal renal arterial branches vs. conventional main renal artery treatment: a randomized controlled trial for treatment of resistant hypertension",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Effective treatment of uncontrolled hypertension using catheter-based percutaneous renal denervation may depend strongly on the anatomic strategy applied when delivering therapy. We hypothesized that concentering renal denervation treatment in the distal region of the artery would improve clinical response.METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled, and parallel group study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02667912). Fifty-one treatment-resistant hypertensive patients meeting guideline indications were randomized either to 'conventional' treatment restricted to the main renal artery (n = 26) or to 'distal' treatment applied mainly in the distal branches beyond the main bifurcation (n = 25). Computer-based treatment assignment was performed in the catheterization laboratory at the time of the procedure by the interventional radiologist and remained unknown to patients, investigators, and other outcomes assessors for the entire study period. Six months after randomization, the distal therapy group (n = 24) had a significantly greater decrease in the primary outcome, 24-h mean ambulatory SBP, as compared with the conventionally treated group (n = 21): -22.6 ± 20.0 vs -9.4 ± 18.7 mmHg; P less than 0.05. No major safety issues were observed in either group.CONCLUSION: Percutaneous renal denervation treatment was significantly less effective at lowering 24-h blood pressure in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients when therapy was applied conventionally in the trunk of renal artery as compared with when applied to distal segmental branches. This observation is in accordance with previous surgical and anatomical findings showing that most renal nerve fibers are distant from the lumen proximally and become available for endovascular treatment mainly in the distal portion of the vessel.",
keywords = "Aged, Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Coronary Vasospasm/drug therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypertension/drug therapy, Kidney/blood supply, Male, Middle Aged, Renal Artery/innervation, Sympathectomy/methods, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Pekarskiy, {Stanislav E} and Baev, {Andrei E} and Mordovin, {Victor F} and Semke, {Galina V} and Ripp, {Tatyana M} and Falkovskaya, {Alla U} and Lichikaki, {Valeria A} and Sitkova, {Ekaterina S} and Zubanova, {Irina V} and Popov, {Sergei V}",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1097/HJH.0000000000001160",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "369--375",
journal = "Journal of Hypertension",
issn = "0263-6352",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Denervation of the distal renal arterial branches vs. conventional main renal artery treatment

T2 - a randomized controlled trial for treatment of resistant hypertension

AU - Pekarskiy, Stanislav E

AU - Baev, Andrei E

AU - Mordovin, Victor F

AU - Semke, Galina V

AU - Ripp, Tatyana M

AU - Falkovskaya, Alla U

AU - Lichikaki, Valeria A

AU - Sitkova, Ekaterina S

AU - Zubanova, Irina V

AU - Popov, Sergei V

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: Effective treatment of uncontrolled hypertension using catheter-based percutaneous renal denervation may depend strongly on the anatomic strategy applied when delivering therapy. We hypothesized that concentering renal denervation treatment in the distal region of the artery would improve clinical response.METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled, and parallel group study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02667912). Fifty-one treatment-resistant hypertensive patients meeting guideline indications were randomized either to 'conventional' treatment restricted to the main renal artery (n = 26) or to 'distal' treatment applied mainly in the distal branches beyond the main bifurcation (n = 25). Computer-based treatment assignment was performed in the catheterization laboratory at the time of the procedure by the interventional radiologist and remained unknown to patients, investigators, and other outcomes assessors for the entire study period. Six months after randomization, the distal therapy group (n = 24) had a significantly greater decrease in the primary outcome, 24-h mean ambulatory SBP, as compared with the conventionally treated group (n = 21): -22.6 ± 20.0 vs -9.4 ± 18.7 mmHg; P less than 0.05. No major safety issues were observed in either group.CONCLUSION: Percutaneous renal denervation treatment was significantly less effective at lowering 24-h blood pressure in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients when therapy was applied conventionally in the trunk of renal artery as compared with when applied to distal segmental branches. This observation is in accordance with previous surgical and anatomical findings showing that most renal nerve fibers are distant from the lumen proximally and become available for endovascular treatment mainly in the distal portion of the vessel.

AB - BACKGROUND: Effective treatment of uncontrolled hypertension using catheter-based percutaneous renal denervation may depend strongly on the anatomic strategy applied when delivering therapy. We hypothesized that concentering renal denervation treatment in the distal region of the artery would improve clinical response.METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled, and parallel group study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02667912). Fifty-one treatment-resistant hypertensive patients meeting guideline indications were randomized either to 'conventional' treatment restricted to the main renal artery (n = 26) or to 'distal' treatment applied mainly in the distal branches beyond the main bifurcation (n = 25). Computer-based treatment assignment was performed in the catheterization laboratory at the time of the procedure by the interventional radiologist and remained unknown to patients, investigators, and other outcomes assessors for the entire study period. Six months after randomization, the distal therapy group (n = 24) had a significantly greater decrease in the primary outcome, 24-h mean ambulatory SBP, as compared with the conventionally treated group (n = 21): -22.6 ± 20.0 vs -9.4 ± 18.7 mmHg; P less than 0.05. No major safety issues were observed in either group.CONCLUSION: Percutaneous renal denervation treatment was significantly less effective at lowering 24-h blood pressure in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients when therapy was applied conventionally in the trunk of renal artery as compared with when applied to distal segmental branches. This observation is in accordance with previous surgical and anatomical findings showing that most renal nerve fibers are distant from the lumen proximally and become available for endovascular treatment mainly in the distal portion of the vessel.

KW - Aged

KW - Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use

KW - Blood Pressure

KW - Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

KW - Coronary Vasospasm/drug therapy

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Hypertension/drug therapy

KW - Kidney/blood supply

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Renal Artery/innervation

KW - Sympathectomy/methods

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001160

DO - 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001160

M3 - Article

C2 - 28005705

VL - 35

SP - 369

EP - 375

JO - Journal of Hypertension

JF - Journal of Hypertension

SN - 0263-6352

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 39019311