Standard

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0). / Zaborovskii, Nikita; Denisov, Anton; Shapton, John; Schlauch, Adam; Ptashnikov, Dmitrii; Masevnin, Sergei; Smekalenkov, Oleg; Murakhovsky, Vladislav; Mytyga, Pavel; Kondrashov, Dimitriy.

в: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Том 39, № 4, 01.10.2023, стр. 568-575.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Zaborovskii, N, Denisov, A, Shapton, J, Schlauch, A, Ptashnikov, D, Masevnin, S, Smekalenkov, O, Murakhovsky, V, Mytyga, P & Kondrashov, D 2023, 'Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0)', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Том. 39, № 4, стр. 568-575. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23403

APA

Zaborovskii, N., Denisov, A., Shapton, J., Schlauch, A., Ptashnikov, D., Masevnin, S., Smekalenkov, O., Murakhovsky, V., Mytyga, P., & Kondrashov, D. (2023). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0). Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 39(4), 568-575. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23403

Vancouver

Zaborovskii N, Denisov A, Shapton J, Schlauch A, Ptashnikov D, Masevnin S и пр. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0). Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2023 Окт. 1;39(4):568-575. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23403

Author

Zaborovskii, Nikita ; Denisov, Anton ; Shapton, John ; Schlauch, Adam ; Ptashnikov, Dmitrii ; Masevnin, Sergei ; Smekalenkov, Oleg ; Murakhovsky, Vladislav ; Mytyga, Pavel ; Kondrashov, Dimitriy. / Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0). в: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2023 ; Том 39, № 4. стр. 568-575.

BibTeX

@article{282885db5a3a4f7ab0edc7b57fc95c0b,
title = "Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0)",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The most validated health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire specific to the metastatic spine cancer population is the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2 (SOSGOQ2.0). The purpose of this study was to translate and validate a Russian version of the SOSGOQ2.0.METHODS: The SOSGOQ2.0 was translated into Russian and cross-culturally adapted. In this study, 64 eligible patients completed the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS along with the EQ-5D 5 Level, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaires, and visual analog scale for pain assessment scale (VAS). Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha, in which a score of 0.65 or higher is acceptable. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by examining the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).RESULTS: Included in this study were 64 Russian-speaking patients (median age 59 years) with metastatic spine disease. The most common primary tumors were breast, kidney, and prostate cancers. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.87, indicating high internal consistency. The overall ICC for the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS was 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.93), indicating high reliability and consistency of the measure. The physical function, pain, and mental health domains of the SF-36 moderately correlated with the same domains of the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.65 to 0.71.CONCLUSIONS: The SOSGOQ2.0_RUS is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing the HRQOL in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. The questionnaire showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and good construct validity when compared with other established questionnaires.",
keywords = "Male, Humans, Middle Aged, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spine, Quality of Life, Spinal Neoplasms/secondary, Pain, Psychometrics",
author = "Nikita Zaborovskii and Anton Denisov and John Shapton and Adam Schlauch and Dmitrii Ptashnikov and Sergei Masevnin and Oleg Smekalenkov and Vladislav Murakhovsky and Pavel Mytyga and Dimitriy Kondrashov",
year = "2023",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23403",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "568--575",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0)

AU - Zaborovskii, Nikita

AU - Denisov, Anton

AU - Shapton, John

AU - Schlauch, Adam

AU - Ptashnikov, Dmitrii

AU - Masevnin, Sergei

AU - Smekalenkov, Oleg

AU - Murakhovsky, Vladislav

AU - Mytyga, Pavel

AU - Kondrashov, Dimitriy

PY - 2023/10/1

Y1 - 2023/10/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The most validated health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire specific to the metastatic spine cancer population is the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2 (SOSGOQ2.0). The purpose of this study was to translate and validate a Russian version of the SOSGOQ2.0.METHODS: The SOSGOQ2.0 was translated into Russian and cross-culturally adapted. In this study, 64 eligible patients completed the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS along with the EQ-5D 5 Level, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaires, and visual analog scale for pain assessment scale (VAS). Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha, in which a score of 0.65 or higher is acceptable. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by examining the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).RESULTS: Included in this study were 64 Russian-speaking patients (median age 59 years) with metastatic spine disease. The most common primary tumors were breast, kidney, and prostate cancers. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.87, indicating high internal consistency. The overall ICC for the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS was 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.93), indicating high reliability and consistency of the measure. The physical function, pain, and mental health domains of the SF-36 moderately correlated with the same domains of the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.65 to 0.71.CONCLUSIONS: The SOSGOQ2.0_RUS is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing the HRQOL in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. The questionnaire showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and good construct validity when compared with other established questionnaires.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The most validated health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire specific to the metastatic spine cancer population is the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2 (SOSGOQ2.0). The purpose of this study was to translate and validate a Russian version of the SOSGOQ2.0.METHODS: The SOSGOQ2.0 was translated into Russian and cross-culturally adapted. In this study, 64 eligible patients completed the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS along with the EQ-5D 5 Level, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaires, and visual analog scale for pain assessment scale (VAS). Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha, in which a score of 0.65 or higher is acceptable. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by examining the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).RESULTS: Included in this study were 64 Russian-speaking patients (median age 59 years) with metastatic spine disease. The most common primary tumors were breast, kidney, and prostate cancers. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.87, indicating high internal consistency. The overall ICC for the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS was 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.93), indicating high reliability and consistency of the measure. The physical function, pain, and mental health domains of the SF-36 moderately correlated with the same domains of the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.65 to 0.71.CONCLUSIONS: The SOSGOQ2.0_RUS is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing the HRQOL in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. The questionnaire showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and good construct validity when compared with other established questionnaires.

KW - Male

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Cross-Cultural Comparison

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Spine

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Spinal Neoplasms/secondary

KW - Pain

KW - Psychometrics

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/88cf558c-0ab1-38e2-928a-d53a44135aaa/

U2 - 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23403

DO - 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23403

M3 - Article

C2 - 37439460

VL - 39

SP - 568

EP - 575

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 113774520