Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Coordinated Influence on the Opinions of Social Network Members. / Rogov, M. A.; Sedakov, A. A.
в: Automation and Remote Control, Том 81, № 3, 01.03.2020, стр. 528-547.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Coordinated Influence on the Opinions of Social Network Members
AU - Rogov, M. A.
AU - Sedakov, A. A.
N1 - Rogov, M.A., Sedakov, A.A. Coordinated Influence on the Opinions of Social Network Members. Autom Remote Control 81, 528–547 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117920030108
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - This paper studies a model of coordinated influence in a social network in which several members, called players, can jointly affect the opinions of other members, called agents, during a finite period of time. The model is treated as a cooperative dynamic game. The influence of players is expressed by declaring their opinions which are then considered and weighted by the agents to form their own opinions. The goal is to find the declared opinions of players focusing only on associated costs as well as on the average deviation of agents beliefs from the desired ones. Under coordination, the total costs of players are distributed using the Shapley value. If there is no information about the degrees of trust of agents to each other, these degrees are estimated using a centrality measure. Numerical simulation is performed for a well-known social network of a university karate club and for a lattice graph often used for modeling of spatial networks.
AB - This paper studies a model of coordinated influence in a social network in which several members, called players, can jointly affect the opinions of other members, called agents, during a finite period of time. The model is treated as a cooperative dynamic game. The influence of players is expressed by declaring their opinions which are then considered and weighted by the agents to form their own opinions. The goal is to find the declared opinions of players focusing only on associated costs as well as on the average deviation of agents beliefs from the desired ones. Under coordination, the total costs of players are distributed using the Shapley value. If there is no information about the degrees of trust of agents to each other, these degrees are estimated using a centrality measure. Numerical simulation is performed for a well-known social network of a university karate club and for a lattice graph often used for modeling of spatial networks.
KW - CENTRALITY
KW - CONSENSUS
KW - DYNAMICS
KW - INFORMATIONAL CONTROL
KW - MODELS
KW - WISDOM
KW - centrality
KW - cooperation
KW - equilibrium
KW - influence
KW - linear-quadratic games
KW - opinion dynamics
KW - social network
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082768445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9cd057ba-c349-36c4-82ba-00f1cf95f19f/
U2 - 10.1134/S0005117920030108
DO - 10.1134/S0005117920030108
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85082768445
VL - 81
SP - 528
EP - 547
JO - Automation and Remote Control
JF - Automation and Remote Control
SN - 0005-1179
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 52763743