Standard

Context-dependent lateralization of trunk movements in wild Asian elephants. / Giljov, Andrey; Silva, Shermin de; Karenina, Karina.

в: Biological Communications, Том 62, № 2, 2017, стр. 82–92.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Giljov, Andrey ; Silva, Shermin de ; Karenina, Karina. / Context-dependent lateralization of trunk movements in wild Asian elephants. в: Biological Communications. 2017 ; Том 62, № 2. стр. 82–92.

BibTeX

@article{400cc30c6c014783b4c3f082bf9ae02f,
title = "Context-dependent lateralization of trunk movements in wild Asian elephants",
abstract = "Asymmetrical trunk use in elephants represents a distinctive example of motor lateralization. Previous studies have shown that trunk movements in the elephant behaviour associated with feeding is lateralized at the individual, but not the population level. The manifestation of lateralized behaviour depends on the nature of the behaviour and is usually more pronounced in social context. Therefore, we hypothesized that population-level lateralization of trunk use in elephants is manifested in social behaviour. One-sided biases in trunk movements were assessed in wild individually-identified Asian elephants during feeding (tearing off a tuft of grass) and social interactions (trunk-to-mouth contacts and trunk-to-genitals contacts between male initiator and female recipient). In feeding, lateralization at the individual and population levels was estimated based on 50 lateral trunk uses per individual. In social interactions, only the population-level bias was assessed using a single trunk contact from each individual. For trunk movements during feeding, elephants showed robust individual preferences, but no population-level lateralization. The distribution of right- and left-trunkers in the present study did not differ significantly from that obtained in previous studies of both the same elephant population and geographically distinct population. No population-level bias in trunk movements during trunk-to-mouth contacts was revealed. In trunk-to-genitals contacts, in contrast, a population-level lateralization was found. Right-sided trunk movements prevailed in males touching females. While individual preferences for feeding, combined with the absence of one-sided population bias, is obviously a species-typical characteristic of Asian elephants, social behaviour, such as male-female socio-sexual contacts, can elicit population-level lateralization of trunk use in this species. The right-sided bias in trunk-to-genitals contacts may reflect lateralization of olfactory perception. If this is the case, the revealed lateralization indicates a right-hemispheric advantage in the processing of social information which is consistent with the general tendency in mammals.",
keywords = "laterality of trunk use, functional asymmetry of the trunk, trunk contacts, free-ranging Asian elephants, motor preferences, feeding, social laterality, lateralization of unpaired organs, laterality of trunk use, functional asymmetry of the trunk, trunk contacts, free-ranging Asian elephants, motor preferences, feeding, social laterality, lateralization of unpaired organs",
author = "Andrey Giljov and Silva, {Shermin de} and Karina Karenina",
note = "Giljov, A., de Silva, S., & Karenina, K. (2017). Context-dependent lateralization of trunk movements in wild Asian elephants. Biological Communications, 62(2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu03.2017.204",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.21638/11701/spbu03.2017.204",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "82–92",
journal = "Biological Communications",
issn = "2542-2154",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Context-dependent lateralization of trunk movements in wild Asian elephants

AU - Giljov, Andrey

AU - Silva, Shermin de

AU - Karenina, Karina

N1 - Giljov, A., de Silva, S., & Karenina, K. (2017). Context-dependent lateralization of trunk movements in wild Asian elephants. Biological Communications, 62(2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu03.2017.204

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Asymmetrical trunk use in elephants represents a distinctive example of motor lateralization. Previous studies have shown that trunk movements in the elephant behaviour associated with feeding is lateralized at the individual, but not the population level. The manifestation of lateralized behaviour depends on the nature of the behaviour and is usually more pronounced in social context. Therefore, we hypothesized that population-level lateralization of trunk use in elephants is manifested in social behaviour. One-sided biases in trunk movements were assessed in wild individually-identified Asian elephants during feeding (tearing off a tuft of grass) and social interactions (trunk-to-mouth contacts and trunk-to-genitals contacts between male initiator and female recipient). In feeding, lateralization at the individual and population levels was estimated based on 50 lateral trunk uses per individual. In social interactions, only the population-level bias was assessed using a single trunk contact from each individual. For trunk movements during feeding, elephants showed robust individual preferences, but no population-level lateralization. The distribution of right- and left-trunkers in the present study did not differ significantly from that obtained in previous studies of both the same elephant population and geographically distinct population. No population-level bias in trunk movements during trunk-to-mouth contacts was revealed. In trunk-to-genitals contacts, in contrast, a population-level lateralization was found. Right-sided trunk movements prevailed in males touching females. While individual preferences for feeding, combined with the absence of one-sided population bias, is obviously a species-typical characteristic of Asian elephants, social behaviour, such as male-female socio-sexual contacts, can elicit population-level lateralization of trunk use in this species. The right-sided bias in trunk-to-genitals contacts may reflect lateralization of olfactory perception. If this is the case, the revealed lateralization indicates a right-hemispheric advantage in the processing of social information which is consistent with the general tendency in mammals.

AB - Asymmetrical trunk use in elephants represents a distinctive example of motor lateralization. Previous studies have shown that trunk movements in the elephant behaviour associated with feeding is lateralized at the individual, but not the population level. The manifestation of lateralized behaviour depends on the nature of the behaviour and is usually more pronounced in social context. Therefore, we hypothesized that population-level lateralization of trunk use in elephants is manifested in social behaviour. One-sided biases in trunk movements were assessed in wild individually-identified Asian elephants during feeding (tearing off a tuft of grass) and social interactions (trunk-to-mouth contacts and trunk-to-genitals contacts between male initiator and female recipient). In feeding, lateralization at the individual and population levels was estimated based on 50 lateral trunk uses per individual. In social interactions, only the population-level bias was assessed using a single trunk contact from each individual. For trunk movements during feeding, elephants showed robust individual preferences, but no population-level lateralization. The distribution of right- and left-trunkers in the present study did not differ significantly from that obtained in previous studies of both the same elephant population and geographically distinct population. No population-level bias in trunk movements during trunk-to-mouth contacts was revealed. In trunk-to-genitals contacts, in contrast, a population-level lateralization was found. Right-sided trunk movements prevailed in males touching females. While individual preferences for feeding, combined with the absence of one-sided population bias, is obviously a species-typical characteristic of Asian elephants, social behaviour, such as male-female socio-sexual contacts, can elicit population-level lateralization of trunk use in this species. The right-sided bias in trunk-to-genitals contacts may reflect lateralization of olfactory perception. If this is the case, the revealed lateralization indicates a right-hemispheric advantage in the processing of social information which is consistent with the general tendency in mammals.

KW - laterality of trunk use

KW - functional asymmetry of the trunk

KW - trunk contacts

KW - free-ranging Asian elephants

KW - motor preferences

KW - feeding

KW - social laterality

KW - lateralization of unpaired organs

KW - laterality of trunk use

KW - functional asymmetry of the trunk

KW - trunk contacts

KW - free-ranging Asian elephants

KW - motor preferences

KW - feeding

KW - social laterality

KW - lateralization of unpaired organs

U2 - 10.21638/11701/spbu03.2017.204

DO - 10.21638/11701/spbu03.2017.204

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 82

EP - 92

JO - Biological Communications

JF - Biological Communications

SN - 2542-2154

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 9703452