Standard

Comparison of different methods for preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid. / Aleksandrova, A. G.; Galushina, T. Yu.; Kholshevnikov, K. V.

в: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Том 1214, № 1, 012007, 29.04.2019.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатья в журнале по материалам конференцииРецензирование

Harvard

Aleksandrova, AG, Galushina, TY & Kholshevnikov, KV 2019, 'Comparison of different methods for preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid', Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Том. 1214, № 1, 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1214/1/012007

APA

Aleksandrova, A. G., Galushina, T. Y., & Kholshevnikov, K. V. (2019). Comparison of different methods for preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1214(1), [012007]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1214/1/012007

Vancouver

Aleksandrova AG, Galushina TY, Kholshevnikov KV. Comparison of different methods for preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019 Апр. 29;1214(1). 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1214/1/012007

Author

Aleksandrova, A. G. ; Galushina, T. Yu. ; Kholshevnikov, K. V. / Comparison of different methods for preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid. в: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019 ; Том 1214, № 1.

BibTeX

@article{47447336cef640639a2c0262b59df159,
title = "Comparison of different methods for preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid",
abstract = "This paper deals with one of the methods asteroid hazard mitigation. The preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid during the previous close encounter before its predicted collision is considered. Two variants of the explosion are considered: In the first case a projectile overtakes an asteroid; in the second one the situation is contrary. The second way requires significantly lower velocity of spacecraft delivery. On the other hand, it loses to the first way, since the number of fragments falling to the Earth is about an order of magnitude larger. However, with a more careful approach (non-isotropic explosion), this unfavorable factor can be likely reduced.",
author = "Aleksandrova, {A. G.} and Galushina, {T. Yu.} and Kholshevnikov, {K. V.}",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/1214/1/012007",
language = "English",
volume = "1214",
journal = "Journal of Physics: Conference Series",
issn = "1742-6588",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",
note = "7th International Conference on Current Issues of Continuum Mechanics and Celestial Mechanics, CICMCM 2018 ; Conference date: 26-11-2018 Through 28-11-2018",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of different methods for preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid

AU - Aleksandrova, A. G.

AU - Galushina, T. Yu.

AU - Kholshevnikov, K. V.

PY - 2019/4/29

Y1 - 2019/4/29

N2 - This paper deals with one of the methods asteroid hazard mitigation. The preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid during the previous close encounter before its predicted collision is considered. Two variants of the explosion are considered: In the first case a projectile overtakes an asteroid; in the second one the situation is contrary. The second way requires significantly lower velocity of spacecraft delivery. On the other hand, it loses to the first way, since the number of fragments falling to the Earth is about an order of magnitude larger. However, with a more careful approach (non-isotropic explosion), this unfavorable factor can be likely reduced.

AB - This paper deals with one of the methods asteroid hazard mitigation. The preventive destruction of a hazardous asteroid during the previous close encounter before its predicted collision is considered. Two variants of the explosion are considered: In the first case a projectile overtakes an asteroid; in the second one the situation is contrary. The second way requires significantly lower velocity of spacecraft delivery. On the other hand, it loses to the first way, since the number of fragments falling to the Earth is about an order of magnitude larger. However, with a more careful approach (non-isotropic explosion), this unfavorable factor can be likely reduced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066339045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/1214/1/012007

DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/1214/1/012007

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85066339045

VL - 1214

JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

SN - 1742-6588

IS - 1

M1 - 012007

T2 - 7th International Conference on Current Issues of Continuum Mechanics and Celestial Mechanics, CICMCM 2018

Y2 - 26 November 2018 through 28 November 2018

ER -

ID: 50000295