Standard

Comparison and critical assessment of single-cell Hi-C protocols. / Gridina, M.; Taskina, A.; Lagunov, T.; Nurislamov, A.; Kulikova, T.; Krasikova, A.; Fishman, V.

в: Heliyon, Том 8, № 10, e11023, 01.10.2022.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Gridina, M, Taskina, A, Lagunov, T, Nurislamov, A, Kulikova, T, Krasikova, A & Fishman, V 2022, 'Comparison and critical assessment of single-cell Hi-C protocols', Heliyon, Том. 8, № 10, e11023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11023

APA

Gridina, M., Taskina, A., Lagunov, T., Nurislamov, A., Kulikova, T., Krasikova, A., & Fishman, V. (2022). Comparison and critical assessment of single-cell Hi-C protocols. Heliyon, 8(10), [e11023]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11023

Vancouver

Gridina M, Taskina A, Lagunov T, Nurislamov A, Kulikova T, Krasikova A и пр. Comparison and critical assessment of single-cell Hi-C protocols. Heliyon. 2022 Окт. 1;8(10). e11023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11023

Author

Gridina, M. ; Taskina, A. ; Lagunov, T. ; Nurislamov, A. ; Kulikova, T. ; Krasikova, A. ; Fishman, V. / Comparison and critical assessment of single-cell Hi-C protocols. в: Heliyon. 2022 ; Том 8, № 10.

BibTeX

@article{995a7bc9020b4ae0856a06a890d1e086,
title = "Comparison and critical assessment of single-cell Hi-C protocols",
abstract = "Advances in single-cell sequencing technologies make it possible to study the genome architecture in single cells. The rapid growth of the field has been fueled by the development of innovative single-cell Hi-C protocols. However, the protocols vary considerably in their efficiency, bias, scale and costs, and their relative advantages for different applications are unclear. Here, we compare the two most commonly used single-cell Hi-C protocols. We use long-read sequencing to analyze molecular products of the Hi-C assay and show that whole-genome amplification step results in increased number of artifacts, larger coverage biases, and increased amount of noise compared to PCR-based amplification. Our comparison provides guidance for researchers studying chromatin architecture in individual cells.",
keywords = "Chicken, Genome architecture, Oocyte, Single-cell Hi-C",
author = "M. Gridina and A. Taskina and T. Lagunov and A. Nurislamov and T. Kulikova and A. Krasikova and V. Fishman",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11023",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Heliyon",
issn = "2405-8440",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison and critical assessment of single-cell Hi-C protocols

AU - Gridina, M.

AU - Taskina, A.

AU - Lagunov, T.

AU - Nurislamov, A.

AU - Kulikova, T.

AU - Krasikova, A.

AU - Fishman, V.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

PY - 2022/10/1

Y1 - 2022/10/1

N2 - Advances in single-cell sequencing technologies make it possible to study the genome architecture in single cells. The rapid growth of the field has been fueled by the development of innovative single-cell Hi-C protocols. However, the protocols vary considerably in their efficiency, bias, scale and costs, and their relative advantages for different applications are unclear. Here, we compare the two most commonly used single-cell Hi-C protocols. We use long-read sequencing to analyze molecular products of the Hi-C assay and show that whole-genome amplification step results in increased number of artifacts, larger coverage biases, and increased amount of noise compared to PCR-based amplification. Our comparison provides guidance for researchers studying chromatin architecture in individual cells.

AB - Advances in single-cell sequencing technologies make it possible to study the genome architecture in single cells. The rapid growth of the field has been fueled by the development of innovative single-cell Hi-C protocols. However, the protocols vary considerably in their efficiency, bias, scale and costs, and their relative advantages for different applications are unclear. Here, we compare the two most commonly used single-cell Hi-C protocols. We use long-read sequencing to analyze molecular products of the Hi-C assay and show that whole-genome amplification step results in increased number of artifacts, larger coverage biases, and increased amount of noise compared to PCR-based amplification. Our comparison provides guidance for researchers studying chromatin architecture in individual cells.

KW - Chicken

KW - Genome architecture

KW - Oocyte

KW - Single-cell Hi-C

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140307451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/acb2bc85-2e5d-36ab-8e7f-82b294c8167e/

U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11023

DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11023

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85140307451

VL - 8

JO - Heliyon

JF - Heliyon

SN - 2405-8440

IS - 10

M1 - e11023

ER -

ID: 99845518