Standard

Comparing laser vs mechanical lithotripsy in suction mini‐PCNL for kidney stone disease: A prospective multicentre study by the endourology section of EAU. / Cormio, Angelo; Gauhar, Vineet; Somani, Bhaskar K.; Kalathia, Jaisukh; Gadzhiev, Nariman; Zawadzki, Marek; Laymon, Mahmoud; Tan, Karl; Tak, Gopal Ramdas; Tokas, Theodoros; Agrawal, Madhu Sudan; De La Rosette, Jean; Petkova, Kremena; Taguchi, Kazumi; Gorelov, Dmitriy; Martov, Alexey G.; Lopes, Leonardo Gomes; Gökce, Mehmet Ilker; Kamal, Wissam; Ferretti, Stefania; Desai, Devang; Shwani, Yadgar Abduljabbar; Fong, Khi Yung; Yuen, Steffi Kar Kei; Skolarikos, Andreas; Cepeda, Marcos; Herrmann, Thomas R. W.; Castellani, Daniele.

в: BJUI Compass, Том 6, № 10, e70075, 01.10.2025.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Cormio, A, Gauhar, V, Somani, BK, Kalathia, J, Gadzhiev, N, Zawadzki, M, Laymon, M, Tan, K, Tak, GR, Tokas, T, Agrawal, MS, De La Rosette, J, Petkova, K, Taguchi, K, Gorelov, D, Martov, AG, Lopes, LG, Gökce, MI, Kamal, W, Ferretti, S, Desai, D, Shwani, YA, Fong, KY, Yuen, SKK, Skolarikos, A, Cepeda, M, Herrmann, TRW & Castellani, D 2025, 'Comparing laser vs mechanical lithotripsy in suction mini‐PCNL for kidney stone disease: A prospective multicentre study by the endourology section of EAU', BJUI Compass, Том. 6, № 10, e70075. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70075

APA

Cormio, A., Gauhar, V., Somani, B. K., Kalathia, J., Gadzhiev, N., Zawadzki, M., Laymon, M., Tan, K., Tak, G. R., Tokas, T., Agrawal, M. S., De La Rosette, J., Petkova, K., Taguchi, K., Gorelov, D., Martov, A. G., Lopes, L. G., Gökce, M. I., Kamal, W., ... Castellani, D. (2025). Comparing laser vs mechanical lithotripsy in suction mini‐PCNL for kidney stone disease: A prospective multicentre study by the endourology section of EAU. BJUI Compass, 6(10), [ e70075]. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70075

Vancouver

Author

Cormio, Angelo ; Gauhar, Vineet ; Somani, Bhaskar K. ; Kalathia, Jaisukh ; Gadzhiev, Nariman ; Zawadzki, Marek ; Laymon, Mahmoud ; Tan, Karl ; Tak, Gopal Ramdas ; Tokas, Theodoros ; Agrawal, Madhu Sudan ; De La Rosette, Jean ; Petkova, Kremena ; Taguchi, Kazumi ; Gorelov, Dmitriy ; Martov, Alexey G. ; Lopes, Leonardo Gomes ; Gökce, Mehmet Ilker ; Kamal, Wissam ; Ferretti, Stefania ; Desai, Devang ; Shwani, Yadgar Abduljabbar ; Fong, Khi Yung ; Yuen, Steffi Kar Kei ; Skolarikos, Andreas ; Cepeda, Marcos ; Herrmann, Thomas R. W. ; Castellani, Daniele. / Comparing laser vs mechanical lithotripsy in suction mini‐PCNL for kidney stone disease: A prospective multicentre study by the endourology section of EAU. в: BJUI Compass. 2025 ; Том 6, № 10.

BibTeX

@article{fc39f4b5dc0a498f953dfc524c76c2f8,
title = "Comparing laser vs mechanical lithotripsy in suction mini‐PCNL for kidney stone disease: A prospective multicentre study by the endourology section of EAU",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative outcomes, complications and stone-free rates (SFRs) between laser and non-laser lithotripsy in suction-assisted mini-PCNL (SM-PCNL).SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective multicentre study enrolled adults with normal kidneys undergoing SM-PCNL (14-22 Fr) across 30 international centres (March-November 2024). Patients were divided into laser (Group 1) and non-laser (Group 2) groups. Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed based on age, sex, Guy's score and patient position. Primary outcomes were complications and 30-day SFR assessed by CT. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of complete stone clearance and complications.RESULTS: After matching, 748 patients were analysed (Group 1: 448; Group 2: 300). Non-laser devices were associated with shorter lithotripsy (12 vs 18 min, p < 0.001) and operative times (37 vs 45 min, p < 0.001) and higher SFR (intraoperative: 91.3% vs 80.7%; 30-day: 87.7% vs 82.1%). However, transfusions (3.3% vs 0.2%), pelvic perforation and pleural injury (each 3.0%) were more common in Group 2. On multivariable analysis, single-step dilation (OR 3.05) and sheath sizes of 16.5-18 Fr (OR 1.98) or 20-22 Fr (OR 2.72) were associated with higher odds of stone-free status, while skin-to-stone distance >8 cm (OR 0.5) and combined fluoroscopy/ultrasound access (0.28) reduced this likelihood. Stone volume (OR 1.03), serial dilation with non-metal dilators (OR 2.64) and combined fluoroscopy/ultrasound access (OR 2.11) were factors associated with higher odds of complications. The lithotripsy technology had no direct bearing on complications.CONCLUSIONS: Both laser and non-laser lithotripsy are effective in SM-PCNL. Non-laser devices improve efficiency and lasers were preferentially used with 14-18 fr access tracts.",
keywords = "Kidney calculi, Laser, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Sheath, Suction",
author = "Angelo Cormio and Vineet Gauhar and Somani, {Bhaskar K.} and Jaisukh Kalathia and Nariman Gadzhiev and Marek Zawadzki and Mahmoud Laymon and Karl Tan and Tak, {Gopal Ramdas} and Theodoros Tokas and Agrawal, {Madhu Sudan} and {De La Rosette}, Jean and Kremena Petkova and Kazumi Taguchi and Dmitriy Gorelov and Martov, {Alexey G.} and Lopes, {Leonardo Gomes} and G{\"o}kce, {Mehmet Ilker} and Wissam Kamal and Stefania Ferretti and Devang Desai and Shwani, {Yadgar Abduljabbar} and Fong, {Khi Yung} and Yuen, {Steffi Kar Kei} and Andreas Skolarikos and Marcos Cepeda and Herrmann, {Thomas R. W.} and Daniele Castellani",
year = "2025",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bco2.70075",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BJUI Compass",
issn = "2688-4526",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing laser vs mechanical lithotripsy in suction mini‐PCNL for kidney stone disease: A prospective multicentre study by the endourology section of EAU

AU - Cormio, Angelo

AU - Gauhar, Vineet

AU - Somani, Bhaskar K.

AU - Kalathia, Jaisukh

AU - Gadzhiev, Nariman

AU - Zawadzki, Marek

AU - Laymon, Mahmoud

AU - Tan, Karl

AU - Tak, Gopal Ramdas

AU - Tokas, Theodoros

AU - Agrawal, Madhu Sudan

AU - De La Rosette, Jean

AU - Petkova, Kremena

AU - Taguchi, Kazumi

AU - Gorelov, Dmitriy

AU - Martov, Alexey G.

AU - Lopes, Leonardo Gomes

AU - Gökce, Mehmet Ilker

AU - Kamal, Wissam

AU - Ferretti, Stefania

AU - Desai, Devang

AU - Shwani, Yadgar Abduljabbar

AU - Fong, Khi Yung

AU - Yuen, Steffi Kar Kei

AU - Skolarikos, Andreas

AU - Cepeda, Marcos

AU - Herrmann, Thomas R. W.

AU - Castellani, Daniele

PY - 2025/10/1

Y1 - 2025/10/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative outcomes, complications and stone-free rates (SFRs) between laser and non-laser lithotripsy in suction-assisted mini-PCNL (SM-PCNL).SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective multicentre study enrolled adults with normal kidneys undergoing SM-PCNL (14-22 Fr) across 30 international centres (March-November 2024). Patients were divided into laser (Group 1) and non-laser (Group 2) groups. Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed based on age, sex, Guy's score and patient position. Primary outcomes were complications and 30-day SFR assessed by CT. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of complete stone clearance and complications.RESULTS: After matching, 748 patients were analysed (Group 1: 448; Group 2: 300). Non-laser devices were associated with shorter lithotripsy (12 vs 18 min, p < 0.001) and operative times (37 vs 45 min, p < 0.001) and higher SFR (intraoperative: 91.3% vs 80.7%; 30-day: 87.7% vs 82.1%). However, transfusions (3.3% vs 0.2%), pelvic perforation and pleural injury (each 3.0%) were more common in Group 2. On multivariable analysis, single-step dilation (OR 3.05) and sheath sizes of 16.5-18 Fr (OR 1.98) or 20-22 Fr (OR 2.72) were associated with higher odds of stone-free status, while skin-to-stone distance >8 cm (OR 0.5) and combined fluoroscopy/ultrasound access (0.28) reduced this likelihood. Stone volume (OR 1.03), serial dilation with non-metal dilators (OR 2.64) and combined fluoroscopy/ultrasound access (OR 2.11) were factors associated with higher odds of complications. The lithotripsy technology had no direct bearing on complications.CONCLUSIONS: Both laser and non-laser lithotripsy are effective in SM-PCNL. Non-laser devices improve efficiency and lasers were preferentially used with 14-18 fr access tracts.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative outcomes, complications and stone-free rates (SFRs) between laser and non-laser lithotripsy in suction-assisted mini-PCNL (SM-PCNL).SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective multicentre study enrolled adults with normal kidneys undergoing SM-PCNL (14-22 Fr) across 30 international centres (March-November 2024). Patients were divided into laser (Group 1) and non-laser (Group 2) groups. Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed based on age, sex, Guy's score and patient position. Primary outcomes were complications and 30-day SFR assessed by CT. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of complete stone clearance and complications.RESULTS: After matching, 748 patients were analysed (Group 1: 448; Group 2: 300). Non-laser devices were associated with shorter lithotripsy (12 vs 18 min, p < 0.001) and operative times (37 vs 45 min, p < 0.001) and higher SFR (intraoperative: 91.3% vs 80.7%; 30-day: 87.7% vs 82.1%). However, transfusions (3.3% vs 0.2%), pelvic perforation and pleural injury (each 3.0%) were more common in Group 2. On multivariable analysis, single-step dilation (OR 3.05) and sheath sizes of 16.5-18 Fr (OR 1.98) or 20-22 Fr (OR 2.72) were associated with higher odds of stone-free status, while skin-to-stone distance >8 cm (OR 0.5) and combined fluoroscopy/ultrasound access (0.28) reduced this likelihood. Stone volume (OR 1.03), serial dilation with non-metal dilators (OR 2.64) and combined fluoroscopy/ultrasound access (OR 2.11) were factors associated with higher odds of complications. The lithotripsy technology had no direct bearing on complications.CONCLUSIONS: Both laser and non-laser lithotripsy are effective in SM-PCNL. Non-laser devices improve efficiency and lasers were preferentially used with 14-18 fr access tracts.

KW - Kidney calculi

KW - Laser

KW - Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

KW - Sheath

KW - Suction

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/59943dd1-c9dc-3194-9c22-96d45021f21b/

U2 - 10.1002/bco2.70075

DO - 10.1002/bco2.70075

M3 - Article

C2 - 41069364

VL - 6

JO - BJUI Compass

JF - BJUI Compass

SN - 2688-4526

IS - 10

M1 - e70075

ER -

ID: 142724505