TY - GEN

T1 - Communication Channels in Public Policy Development and Implementation

T2 - 7th Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, EGOSE 2020

AU - Golubeva, Anastasia A.

AU - Gilenko, Evgenii V.

N1 - Golubeva, A. Communication Channels in Public Policy Development and Implementation : Online or Offline? (The Case of Separate Waste Collection in St. Petersburg) / A. Golubeva, E. Gilenko // Electronic Governance and Open Society. Challenges in Eurasia - 7th International Conference, EGOSE 2020, Proceedings. - Springer Nature, 2020. - 172-183. Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In recent decades, the development of information and communication technologies has led to expansion of the range of communication channels used by the society. Cheaper, faster and more user-oriented communication channels, such as the Internet and social networks, have proven effective in implementing strategies for promoting goods and services in the private sector. They also demonstrated their popularity in the interaction of public authorities with citizens. Government websites, public services portals, and platforms for electronic public participation now largely determine the nature, quality, and areas of interaction in the public sector. But are the electronic channels a panacea, and will they replace completely the offline channels? The issue of choosing the optimal communication strategy becomes especially relevant when solving complex multidimensional issues of development and implementation of a public policy in any area. At different stages of the communication strategy life cycle, the tasks of interaction are different. The success in their completion is determined, in particular, by selection of the correct communication channel. This article discusses the attributes of different communication channels (online and offline) and using the example of the separate waste collection policy in St. Petersburg (Russia) provides recommendations on the usage of the most effective communication channels for the policy development and implementation. A formal procedure of the conjoint analysis is used as a way to analyze citizens’ preferred attributes of communication channels. The results of a survey conducted among the residents of St. Petersburg allow to conclude that online channels are not always the most preferable and effective ways of such communication.

AB - In recent decades, the development of information and communication technologies has led to expansion of the range of communication channels used by the society. Cheaper, faster and more user-oriented communication channels, such as the Internet and social networks, have proven effective in implementing strategies for promoting goods and services in the private sector. They also demonstrated their popularity in the interaction of public authorities with citizens. Government websites, public services portals, and platforms for electronic public participation now largely determine the nature, quality, and areas of interaction in the public sector. But are the electronic channels a panacea, and will they replace completely the offline channels? The issue of choosing the optimal communication strategy becomes especially relevant when solving complex multidimensional issues of development and implementation of a public policy in any area. At different stages of the communication strategy life cycle, the tasks of interaction are different. The success in their completion is determined, in particular, by selection of the correct communication channel. This article discusses the attributes of different communication channels (online and offline) and using the example of the separate waste collection policy in St. Petersburg (Russia) provides recommendations on the usage of the most effective communication channels for the policy development and implementation. A formal procedure of the conjoint analysis is used as a way to analyze citizens’ preferred attributes of communication channels. The results of a survey conducted among the residents of St. Petersburg allow to conclude that online channels are not always the most preferable and effective ways of such communication.

KW - Citizens’ preferences

KW - Conjoint analysis

KW - Electronic communication

KW - Separate waste collection

KW - SCOPUS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101539737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-67238-6_12

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-67238-6_12

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85101539737

SN - 9783030672379

T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science

SP - 172

EP - 183

BT - Electronic Governance and Open Society

A2 - Chugunov, Andrei

A2 - Khodachek, Igor

A2 - Misnikov, Yuri

A2 - Trutnev, Dmitrii

PB - Springer Nature

Y2 - 18 November 2020 through 19 November 2020

ER -