Standard

Comment on 'Information hidden in the velocity distribution of ions and the exact kinetic Bohm criterion'. / Mustafaev, A. S.; Sukhomlinov, V. S.; Timofeev, N. A.

в: Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Том 27, № 3, 038001, 01.03.2018.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхкомментарий, выступлениеРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{9f5c6cfd0f404105940f48a18a55efd0,
title = "Comment on 'Information hidden in the velocity distribution of ions and the exact kinetic Bohm criterion'",
abstract = "This Comment is devoted to some mathematical inaccuracies made by the authors of the paper 'Information hidden in the velocity distribution of ions and the exact kinetic Bohm criterion' (Plasma Sources Science and Technology 26 055003). In the Comment, we show that the diapason of plasma parameters for the validity of the theoretical results obtained by the authors was defined incorrectly; we made a more accurate definition of this diapason. As a result, we show that it is impossible to confirm or refute the feasibility of the Bohm kinetic criterion on the basis of the data of the cited paper.",
keywords = "ион, распределение по скоростям, критерий Бома",
author = "Mustafaev, {A. S.} and Sukhomlinov, {V. S.} and Timofeev, {N. A.}",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/1361-6595/aab026",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
journal = "Plasma Sources Science and Technology",
issn = "0963-0252",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on 'Information hidden in the velocity distribution of ions and the exact kinetic Bohm criterion'

AU - Mustafaev, A. S.

AU - Sukhomlinov, V. S.

AU - Timofeev, N. A.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This Comment is devoted to some mathematical inaccuracies made by the authors of the paper 'Information hidden in the velocity distribution of ions and the exact kinetic Bohm criterion' (Plasma Sources Science and Technology 26 055003). In the Comment, we show that the diapason of plasma parameters for the validity of the theoretical results obtained by the authors was defined incorrectly; we made a more accurate definition of this diapason. As a result, we show that it is impossible to confirm or refute the feasibility of the Bohm kinetic criterion on the basis of the data of the cited paper.

AB - This Comment is devoted to some mathematical inaccuracies made by the authors of the paper 'Information hidden in the velocity distribution of ions and the exact kinetic Bohm criterion' (Plasma Sources Science and Technology 26 055003). In the Comment, we show that the diapason of plasma parameters for the validity of the theoretical results obtained by the authors was defined incorrectly; we made a more accurate definition of this diapason. As a result, we show that it is impossible to confirm or refute the feasibility of the Bohm kinetic criterion on the basis of the data of the cited paper.

KW - ион, распределение по скоростям, критерий Бома

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045849844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/comment-information-hidden-velocity-distribution-ions-exact-kinetic-bohm-criterion

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6595/aab026

DO - 10.1088/1361-6595/aab026

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85045849844

VL - 27

JO - Plasma Sources Science and Technology

JF - Plasma Sources Science and Technology

SN - 0963-0252

IS - 3

M1 - 038001

ER -

ID: 35367426