Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Civil Society and Theory of Democracy: From the Legacy of the 20th Century. / Gutorov, Vladimir; Koryushkin, Alexander; Zavershinskiy, Konstantin.
в: Social Sciences, Том 11, № 25, 2016, стр. 6134-6140.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Civil Society and Theory of Democracy: From the Legacy of the 20th Century
AU - Gutorov, Vladimir
AU - Koryushkin, Alexander
AU - Zavershinskiy, Konstantin
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The authors explore a problem of correlation between institutions of civil society and liberal democracy. More specifically, they examine a phenomenon of “double democratization” (D. Held) that entails a) a separation of the state and civil society as a socially recognized necessity; and b) a consequent interdependent transformation of both the state and the civil society. These social processes are examined within a context of decades-long multifaceted theoretical debates between proponents of the liberal school of political philosophy and neo-Marxist theorists of the Frankfurt school (H. Marcuse, J. Habermas, etc.). Analysis of major stages in this debate shows that despite differences in argumentation, proponents of these two opposing schools of thought share a conviction that an effective policy of the state is capable of overcoming spontaneously emerging crises by directing resources to achieve specific goals. Both schools agree that power in a democratic state depends on endogenous factors: either on an
AB - The authors explore a problem of correlation between institutions of civil society and liberal democracy. More specifically, they examine a phenomenon of “double democratization” (D. Held) that entails a) a separation of the state and civil society as a socially recognized necessity; and b) a consequent interdependent transformation of both the state and the civil society. These social processes are examined within a context of decades-long multifaceted theoretical debates between proponents of the liberal school of political philosophy and neo-Marxist theorists of the Frankfurt school (H. Marcuse, J. Habermas, etc.). Analysis of major stages in this debate shows that despite differences in argumentation, proponents of these two opposing schools of thought share a conviction that an effective policy of the state is capable of overcoming spontaneously emerging crises by directing resources to achieve specific goals. Both schools agree that power in a democratic state depends on endogenous factors: either on an
KW - democracy
KW - liberalism
KW - conservatism
KW - Marxism
KW - civil society
KW - state
KW - legitimacy
KW - social consciousness
KW - cognitive mobilization
KW - state bureaucracy
U2 - 10.3923/sscience.2016.6134.6140
DO - 10.3923/sscience.2016.6134.6140
M3 - Article
VL - 11
SP - 6134
EP - 6140
JO - SOCIAL SCIENCES (PAKISTAN)
JF - SOCIAL SCIENCES (PAKISTAN)
SN - 1818-5800
IS - 25
ER -
ID: 7647470