TY - JOUR

T1 - Boris N. Chicherin on Western Liberalism and Its Shortcomings

AU - Evlampiev, Igor I.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

PY - 2021/1/2

Y1 - 2021/1/2

N2 - This article examines the criticisms that Chicherin directed at the classical Western liberalism that emerged from the works of John Locke, Claude-Adrien Helvétius, Baron d’Holbach, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the criticisms that can also be directed at modern Western liberalism. Following the early nineteenth-century German philosophers (Fichte, Hegel), Chicherin proves the falsity of liberalism’s philosophical foundations and, above all, the fallacy of its individualism. The latter assumes that the individual is not just independent of society and the state but also primary in relation to them, as well as a limited understanding of freedom that is reducible to an absence of external restrictions on human activity. As Chicherin shows, the stability of a state built on these principles can be ensured only by manipulating the consciousness of its citizens such that they are satisfied with their rulers. The Russian version of liberalism created by Chicherin and his followers is based on an understanding of the individual’s dependence on society’s spiritual wholeness, as well as on an understanding of freedom as man’s spiritual inner quality manifested primarily in his ability to create high culture. Russian liberalism views the state as a value equal to and complementary to the value of individual freedom, defining it as a way of organizing the life of a people that arises naturally in history and is independent of the will of individuals.

AB - This article examines the criticisms that Chicherin directed at the classical Western liberalism that emerged from the works of John Locke, Claude-Adrien Helvétius, Baron d’Holbach, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the criticisms that can also be directed at modern Western liberalism. Following the early nineteenth-century German philosophers (Fichte, Hegel), Chicherin proves the falsity of liberalism’s philosophical foundations and, above all, the fallacy of its individualism. The latter assumes that the individual is not just independent of society and the state but also primary in relation to them, as well as a limited understanding of freedom that is reducible to an absence of external restrictions on human activity. As Chicherin shows, the stability of a state built on these principles can be ensured only by manipulating the consciousness of its citizens such that they are satisfied with their rulers. The Russian version of liberalism created by Chicherin and his followers is based on an understanding of the individual’s dependence on society’s spiritual wholeness, as well as on an understanding of freedom as man’s spiritual inner quality manifested primarily in his ability to create high culture. Russian liberalism views the state as a value equal to and complementary to the value of individual freedom, defining it as a way of organizing the life of a people that arises naturally in history and is independent of the will of individuals.

KW - external and internal freedom

KW - the individual and society

KW - the state and culture

KW - Western and Russian liberalism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107526455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1220100c-eba5-3845-b4ee-a453ea66df2f/

U2 - 10.1080/10611967.2021.1909983

DO - 10.1080/10611967.2021.1909983

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85107526455

VL - 59

SP - 13

EP - 27

JO - Russian Studies in Philosophy

JF - Russian Studies in Philosophy

SN - 1061-1967

IS - 1

ER -