Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья
Argumentation, R. Pavilionis’s meaning continuum and the Kitchen Debate. / Лисанюк, Е.
в: Problemos, Том 88, 2015, стр. 95-113.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Argumentation, R. Pavilionis’s meaning continuum and the Kitchen Debate
AU - Лисанюк, Е.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - In this paper, I propose a logical-cognitive approach to argumentation and advocate an idea that argumentation presupposes that intelligent agents engaged in it are cognitively diverse. My approach to argumentation allows drawing distinctions between justification, conviction and persuasion as its different kinds. In justification agents seek to verify weak or strong coherency of an agent’s position in a dialogue. In conviction they argue to modify their partner’s position by means of demonstrating weak or strong cogency of their positions before a ‘rational judge’. My approach to argumentation employs a ‘light’ version of Dung’s abstract argumentative frameworks. It is based on Stich’s idea of agents’ cognitive diversity the epistemic aspect of which is argued to be close to Pavilionis’s conception of meaning continuum. To illustrate my contributions I use an example based on the Kitchen Debate (1959) between Khrushchev and Nixon.
AB - In this paper, I propose a logical-cognitive approach to argumentation and advocate an idea that argumentation presupposes that intelligent agents engaged in it are cognitively diverse. My approach to argumentation allows drawing distinctions between justification, conviction and persuasion as its different kinds. In justification agents seek to verify weak or strong coherency of an agent’s position in a dialogue. In conviction they argue to modify their partner’s position by means of demonstrating weak or strong cogency of their positions before a ‘rational judge’. My approach to argumentation employs a ‘light’ version of Dung’s abstract argumentative frameworks. It is based on Stich’s idea of agents’ cognitive diversity the epistemic aspect of which is argued to be close to Pavilionis’s conception of meaning continuum. To illustrate my contributions I use an example based on the Kitchen Debate (1959) between Khrushchev and Nixon.
KW - abstract argumentation frameworks
KW - cognitive diversity
KW - Pavilionis’s meaning continuum
KW - the Kitchen Debate
M3 - Article
VL - 88
SP - 95
EP - 113
JO - Problemos
JF - Problemos
SN - 1392-1126
ER -
ID: 5787001