Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
An assessment of water placement algorithms in quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics modeling : the case of rhodopsins' first spectral absorption band maxima. / Nikolaev, Dmitrii M.; Shtyrov, Andrey A.; Mereshchenko, Andrey S.; Panov, Maxim S.; Tveryanovich, Yuri S. ; Ryazantsev, Mikhail N.
в: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Том 22, № 32, 28.08.2020, стр. 18114-18123.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - An assessment of water placement algorithms in quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics modeling
T2 - the case of rhodopsins' first spectral absorption band maxima
AU - Nikolaev, Dmitrii M.
AU - Shtyrov, Andrey A.
AU - Mereshchenko, Andrey S.
AU - Panov, Maxim S.
AU - Tveryanovich, Yuri S.
AU - Ryazantsev, Mikhail N.
N1 - Funding Information: The work was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF), grant No. 20-13-00303. The authors acknowledge Resource Center ‘‘Computer Center of SPbU’’.
PY - 2020/8/28
Y1 - 2020/8/28
N2 - Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) models are a widely used tool to obtain detailed insight into the properties and functioning of proteins. The outcome of QM/MM studies heavily depends on the quality of the applied QM/MM model. Prediction and right placement of internal water molecules in protein cavities is one of the critical parts of any QM/MM model construction. Herein, we performed a systematic study of four protein hydration algorithms. We tested these algorithms for their ability to predict X-ray-resolved water molecules for a set of membrane photosensitive rhodopsin proteins, as well as the influence of the applied water placement algorithms on the QM/MM calculated absorption maxima (λmax) of these proteins. We used 49 rhodopsins and their intermediates with available X-ray structures as the test set. We found that a proper choice of hydration algorithms and setups is needed to predict functionally important water molecules in the chromophore-binding cavity of rhodopsins, such as the water cluster in the N-H region of bacteriorhodopsin or two water molecules in the binding pocket of bovine visual rhodopsin. The QM/MM calculated λmax of rhodopsins is also quite sensitive to the applied protein hydration protocols. The best methodology allows obtaining an 18.0 nm average value for the absolute deviation of the calculated λmax from the experimental λmax. Although the major effect of water molecules on λmax originates from the water molecules located in the binding pocket, the water molecules outside the binding pocket also affect the calculated λmax mainly by causing a reorganization of the protein structure. The results reported in this study can be used for the evaluation and further development of hydration methodologies, in general, and rhodopsin QM/MM models, in particular.
AB - Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) models are a widely used tool to obtain detailed insight into the properties and functioning of proteins. The outcome of QM/MM studies heavily depends on the quality of the applied QM/MM model. Prediction and right placement of internal water molecules in protein cavities is one of the critical parts of any QM/MM model construction. Herein, we performed a systematic study of four protein hydration algorithms. We tested these algorithms for their ability to predict X-ray-resolved water molecules for a set of membrane photosensitive rhodopsin proteins, as well as the influence of the applied water placement algorithms on the QM/MM calculated absorption maxima (λmax) of these proteins. We used 49 rhodopsins and their intermediates with available X-ray structures as the test set. We found that a proper choice of hydration algorithms and setups is needed to predict functionally important water molecules in the chromophore-binding cavity of rhodopsins, such as the water cluster in the N-H region of bacteriorhodopsin or two water molecules in the binding pocket of bovine visual rhodopsin. The QM/MM calculated λmax of rhodopsins is also quite sensitive to the applied protein hydration protocols. The best methodology allows obtaining an 18.0 nm average value for the absolute deviation of the calculated λmax from the experimental λmax. Although the major effect of water molecules on λmax originates from the water molecules located in the binding pocket, the water molecules outside the binding pocket also affect the calculated λmax mainly by causing a reorganization of the protein structure. The results reported in this study can be used for the evaluation and further development of hydration methodologies, in general, and rhodopsin QM/MM models, in particular.
KW - BINDING AFFINITIES
KW - STRUCTURAL-CHANGES
KW - VISUAL PIGMENTS
KW - PROTEIN
KW - MOLECULES
KW - BACTERIORHODOPSIN
KW - SHIFT
KW - LIGHT
KW - ACTIVATION
KW - HYDRATION
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090068602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ca6ae855-49dd-3473-a2f0-6298b3c5865f/
U2 - 10.1039/d0cp02638g
DO - 10.1039/d0cp02638g
M3 - Article
C2 - 32761024
AN - SCOPUS:85090068602
VL - 22
SP - 18114
EP - 18123
JO - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
JF - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
SN - 1463-9076
IS - 32
ER -
ID: 61818610