Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
«ЧТО ЕСТЬ ЧЕЛОВЕК?» (ПС. 8:5): ДВА ВОЗЗРЕНИЯ ИУДЕЕВ НА ПРИРОДУ ЧЕЛОВЕКА В ПЕРСИДСКИЙ ПЕРИОД. / Тантлевский, Игорь Романович.
в: SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ, Том 19, № 2, 2025, стр. 1021-1035.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - «ЧТО ЕСТЬ ЧЕЛОВЕК?» (ПС. 8:5): ДВА ВОЗЗРЕНИЯ ИУДЕЕВ НА ПРИРОДУ ЧЕЛОВЕКА В ПЕРСИДСКИЙ ПЕРИОД
AU - Тантлевский, Игорь Романович
N1 - И. Р. Тантлевский. «ЧТО ЕСТЬ ЧЕЛОВЕК?» (ПС. 8:5): ДВА ВОЗЗРЕНИЯ ИУДЕЕВ НА ПРИРОДУ ЧЕЛОВЕКА В ПЕРСИДСКИЙ ПЕРИОД // ΣΧΟΛΗ Vol. 19. 2 (2025). C. 1021-1035 classics.nsu.ru/schole DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2025-19-2-1021-1035
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The article deals with the Judaeans’ perception and interpretation of the doctrine of existential nature - proclaimed by the Torah in Gen. 6:3 in the Persian period, but going back to the ancient source Yahwist, - about the finitude of man in his fleshly hypostasis, but leaving open for readers the question about the afterlife of the spirit. The author shows that the Judaeans basically formed two answers to the question of the essential nature of man, the “last” question of his existence, identification and self-identification as an individual. One point of view is most clearly expressed by the compiler of the Book of Job: man’s body is ultimately destroyed without hope of restoration, and his spirit - even the wisest and most righteous - descends into Sheol and practically completely loses its individuality, depersonalizes (cf. also, for example, Ps. 104[103]: 29-30; 146[145]:3-4, etc.). The author of the Book of Qoheleth makes no secret of the fact that he is well aware of this extremely pessimistic doctrine. At the same time, the idea of the decisive good of “wisdom” and “justice/righteousness” for man and of the good reward for his adherence to them “there” (šām [Qoh. 3:17], i.e., in the otherworld) runs through his book. One may suppose that he thereby assumes, at least implicitly, that only the spirits of the “righteous and wise” ascend to God in heaven (Qoh. 12:7b; cf. also: Qoh. 3:21a) - thus appearing to be a true particle of the divine Spirit, - while the spirits of the rest descend to Sheol. According to Qoheleth, the “spirit” of man - as an active independent entity - on the death of the flesh returns to God on its own (not God taking it!) and - probably as a consequence - is not correlated with “breath” anywhere in the book (as opposed to relevant passages in the Book of Job and several other biblical texts).
AB - The article deals with the Judaeans’ perception and interpretation of the doctrine of existential nature - proclaimed by the Torah in Gen. 6:3 in the Persian period, but going back to the ancient source Yahwist, - about the finitude of man in his fleshly hypostasis, but leaving open for readers the question about the afterlife of the spirit. The author shows that the Judaeans basically formed two answers to the question of the essential nature of man, the “last” question of his existence, identification and self-identification as an individual. One point of view is most clearly expressed by the compiler of the Book of Job: man’s body is ultimately destroyed without hope of restoration, and his spirit - even the wisest and most righteous - descends into Sheol and practically completely loses its individuality, depersonalizes (cf. also, for example, Ps. 104[103]: 29-30; 146[145]:3-4, etc.). The author of the Book of Qoheleth makes no secret of the fact that he is well aware of this extremely pessimistic doctrine. At the same time, the idea of the decisive good of “wisdom” and “justice/righteousness” for man and of the good reward for his adherence to them “there” (šām [Qoh. 3:17], i.e., in the otherworld) runs through his book. One may suppose that he thereby assumes, at least implicitly, that only the spirits of the “righteous and wise” ascend to God in heaven (Qoh. 12:7b; cf. also: Qoh. 3:21a) - thus appearing to be a true particle of the divine Spirit, - while the spirits of the rest descend to Sheol. According to Qoheleth, the “spirit” of man - as an active independent entity - on the death of the flesh returns to God on its own (not God taking it!) and - probably as a consequence - is not correlated with “breath” anywhere in the book (as opposed to relevant passages in the Book of Job and several other biblical texts).
KW - “ultimate” question of existence, the essence of man’s nature, problem of identification and self-identification of the individual, Genesis 6:3, Job, Qoheleth.
KW - Genesis 6:3
KW - Job
KW - Qoheleth
KW - problem of identification and self-identification of the individual
KW - the essence of man’s nature
KW - “ultimate” question of existence
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f0e53884-0b61-3c0c-85d9-accd4604b60f/
U2 - 10.25205/1995-4328-2025-19-2-1021-1035
DO - 10.25205/1995-4328-2025-19-2-1021-1035
M3 - статья
VL - 19
SP - 1021
EP - 1035
JO - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ
JF - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ
SN - 1995-4328
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 141776476