TY - JOUR

T1 - ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ КРЕАТИВНОСТИ В РОССИИ (2000-2017 ГГ.). ЧАСТЬ I. АНАЛИЗ ЭМПИРИЧЕСКИХ РАБОТ

AU - Miroshnik, K. G.

AU - Shcherbakova, O. V.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Russian Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This article reports the results of the study of the most common methodological practices in the field of creativity research in Russia. In this study, methodological practices are understood as research methodo-logy, statistical data processing, and description of results in scientific papers. Using the search query “creati-vity”, 369 articles with empirical data (N = 377) that were published during 2000–2017 were retrieved from the eLibrary database. A number of methodological indicators and indicators of completeness of the results’ description were evaluated for each empirical study. Frequency analysis was performed based on the collected data. The main results of the present study are the following: (1) most creativity studies were conducted based on quantitative methodology where as very few studies were performed from the perspective of qualitative methodology; (2) divergent thinking tests are the most commonly used measures in creativity research in Rus-sia; (3) using of judges’ subjective scoring for the assessment of divergent thinking is extremely rare; (4) half of the studies are exclusively based on students’ samples; (5) most studies lack the necessary but sufficient description of the sample’s characteristics; (6) most conclusions are inferred from the magnitude of p-value while ignoring the confidence intervals and effect sizes. The results are discussed in the context of the future development of creativity research in Russia.

AB - This article reports the results of the study of the most common methodological practices in the field of creativity research in Russia. In this study, methodological practices are understood as research methodo-logy, statistical data processing, and description of results in scientific papers. Using the search query “creati-vity”, 369 articles with empirical data (N = 377) that were published during 2000–2017 were retrieved from the eLibrary database. A number of methodological indicators and indicators of completeness of the results’ description were evaluated for each empirical study. Frequency analysis was performed based on the collected data. The main results of the present study are the following: (1) most creativity studies were conducted based on quantitative methodology where as very few studies were performed from the perspective of qualitative methodology; (2) divergent thinking tests are the most commonly used measures in creativity research in Rus-sia; (3) using of judges’ subjective scoring for the assessment of divergent thinking is extremely rare; (4) half of the studies are exclusively based on students’ samples; (5) most studies lack the necessary but sufficient description of the sample’s characteristics; (6) most conclusions are inferred from the magnitude of p-value while ignoring the confidence intervals and effect sizes. The results are discussed in the context of the future development of creativity research in Russia.

KW - Creativity

KW - Creativity research

KW - Methodological practices

KW - Methodology

KW - Statistical analysis

KW - methodological practices

KW - creativity research

KW - JOURNALS

KW - creativity

KW - statistical analysis

KW - methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085923503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/67b468c3-9fdf-3573-8938-b8a68f4e2e40/

U2 - 10.31857/S020595920008506-2

DO - 10.31857/S020595920008506-2

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85085923503

VL - 41

SP - 15

EP - 25

JO - Психологический журнал

JF - Психологический журнал

SN - 0205-9592

IS - 2

ER -