Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Спор о смысле истории между Л. Н. Толстым и Ф. М. Достоевским и идея «духовной империи» как формы исторического развития человечества. / Евлампиев, Игорь Иванович; Матвеева, Инга Юрьевна.
в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , Том 38, № 3, 2022, стр. 319-331.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Спор о смысле истории между Л. Н. Толстым и Ф. М. Достоевским и идея «духовной империи» как формы исторического развития человечества
AU - Евлампиев, Игорь Иванович
AU - Матвеева, Инга Юрьевна
N1 - Funding Information: * The reserarch was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 21-18-00153 “The idea of empire and the idea of revolution: two poles of the Russian socio-political worldview in philosophy and culture of the 19th–21th centuries” (St Petersburg State University). Publisher Copyright: © St Petersburg State University, 2022.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The article proves the hypothesis that F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel The Raw Youth expresses the conception of history directed against the model proposed by L. N. Tolstoy in his War and Peace. Tolstoy maintains that the course of history is determined by the spontaneous interactions of elementary biological powers acting within individuals and within nations; he firmly rejects the idea that individuals can influence history by means of their rational will. In his novel The Raw Youth, Dostoevsky defends totally contrary position: only few “higher personalities” can immediately influence history by means of their great ideas, among which the religious ones play especially important role. The article shows that Dostoevsky’s critique had probably an impact on Tolstoy; as a result, in his late religious teaching, he adopted the position which he had previously rejected. Now he thinks that only few “best people” living in the strong compliance with the Jesus Christ’s doctrine direct society towards the way of spiritual perfectness and thus they determine the course of history. This general model of historical development of society can be named as “spiritual Empire” which is contrary to the accepted western liberal tradition generated by the philosophy of the Enlightenment. Within the model of “spiritual Empire”, the aim of the development is represented with the more and more spiritual unity of people and with the fact that everybody serve to the highest values (the creation of culture); such society should be ruled by the “highest personalities” who achieved the highest spiritual development and influence the society rather with the help of their spiritual authority than by means of the material power.
AB - The article proves the hypothesis that F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel The Raw Youth expresses the conception of history directed against the model proposed by L. N. Tolstoy in his War and Peace. Tolstoy maintains that the course of history is determined by the spontaneous interactions of elementary biological powers acting within individuals and within nations; he firmly rejects the idea that individuals can influence history by means of their rational will. In his novel The Raw Youth, Dostoevsky defends totally contrary position: only few “higher personalities” can immediately influence history by means of their great ideas, among which the religious ones play especially important role. The article shows that Dostoevsky’s critique had probably an impact on Tolstoy; as a result, in his late religious teaching, he adopted the position which he had previously rejected. Now he thinks that only few “best people” living in the strong compliance with the Jesus Christ’s doctrine direct society towards the way of spiritual perfectness and thus they determine the course of history. This general model of historical development of society can be named as “spiritual Empire” which is contrary to the accepted western liberal tradition generated by the philosophy of the Enlightenment. Within the model of “spiritual Empire”, the aim of the development is represented with the more and more spiritual unity of people and with the fact that everybody serve to the highest values (the creation of culture); such society should be ruled by the “highest personalities” who achieved the highest spiritual development and influence the society rather with the help of their spiritual authority than by means of the material power.
KW - Fyodor Dostoevsky
KW - Leo Tolstoy
KW - Russian philosophy of history
KW - empire
KW - liberalism and authoritarianism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142638371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e194da55-119a-3486-af9c-6d1d2086ae9b/
U2 - 10.21638/spbu17.2022.304
DO - 10.21638/spbu17.2022.304
M3 - статья
VL - 38
SP - 319
EP - 331
JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология
JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология
SN - 2542-2278
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 101266194