Standard

Спор о смысле истории между Л. Н. Толстым и Ф. М. Достоевским и идея «духовной империи» как формы исторического развития человечества. / Евлампиев, Игорь Иванович; Матвеева, Инга Юрьевна.

в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , Том 38, № 3, 2022, стр. 319-331.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Евлампиев, ИИ & Матвеева, ИЮ 2022, 'Спор о смысле истории между Л. Н. Толстым и Ф. М. Достоевским и идея «духовной империи» как формы исторического развития человечества', Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , Том. 38, № 3, стр. 319-331. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.304

APA

Vancouver

Author

Евлампиев, Игорь Иванович ; Матвеева, Инга Юрьевна. / Спор о смысле истории между Л. Н. Толстым и Ф. М. Достоевским и идея «духовной империи» как формы исторического развития человечества. в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология . 2022 ; Том 38, № 3. стр. 319-331.

BibTeX

@article{1c15a50b0ae64fcb8a71cd6a2932c29f,
title = "Спор о смысле истории между Л. Н. Толстым и Ф. М. Достоевским и идея «духовной империи» как формы исторического развития человечества",
abstract = "The article proves the hypothesis that F. M. Dostoevsky{\textquoteright}s novel The Raw Youth expresses the conception of history directed against the model proposed by L. N. Tolstoy in his War and Peace. Tolstoy maintains that the course of history is determined by the spontaneous interactions of elementary biological powers acting within individuals and within nations; he firmly rejects the idea that individuals can influence history by means of their rational will. In his novel The Raw Youth, Dostoevsky defends totally contrary position: only few “higher personalities” can immediately influence history by means of their great ideas, among which the religious ones play especially important role. The article shows that Dostoevsky{\textquoteright}s critique had probably an impact on Tolstoy; as a result, in his late religious teaching, he adopted the position which he had previously rejected. Now he thinks that only few “best people” living in the strong compliance with the Jesus Christ{\textquoteright}s doctrine direct society towards the way of spiritual perfectness and thus they determine the course of history. This general model of historical development of society can be named as “spiritual Empire” which is contrary to the accepted western liberal tradition generated by the philosophy of the Enlightenment. Within the model of “spiritual Empire”, the aim of the development is represented with the more and more spiritual unity of people and with the fact that everybody serve to the highest values (the creation of culture); such society should be ruled by the “highest personalities” who achieved the highest spiritual development and influence the society rather with the help of their spiritual authority than by means of the material power.",
keywords = "Fyodor Dostoevsky, Leo Tolstoy, Russian philosophy of history, empire, liberalism and authoritarianism",
author = "Евлампиев, {Игорь Иванович} and Матвеева, {Инга Юрьевна}",
note = "Funding Information: * The reserarch was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 21-18-00153 “The idea of empire and the idea of revolution: two poles of the Russian socio-political worldview in philosophy and culture of the 19th–21th centuries” (St Petersburg State University). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} St Petersburg State University, 2022.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.21638/spbu17.2022.304",
language = "русский",
volume = "38",
pages = "319--331",
journal = " Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология ",
issn = "2542-2278",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Спор о смысле истории между Л. Н. Толстым и Ф. М. Достоевским и идея «духовной империи» как формы исторического развития человечества

AU - Евлампиев, Игорь Иванович

AU - Матвеева, Инга Юрьевна

N1 - Funding Information: * The reserarch was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 21-18-00153 “The idea of empire and the idea of revolution: two poles of the Russian socio-political worldview in philosophy and culture of the 19th–21th centuries” (St Petersburg State University). Publisher Copyright: © St Petersburg State University, 2022.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The article proves the hypothesis that F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel The Raw Youth expresses the conception of history directed against the model proposed by L. N. Tolstoy in his War and Peace. Tolstoy maintains that the course of history is determined by the spontaneous interactions of elementary biological powers acting within individuals and within nations; he firmly rejects the idea that individuals can influence history by means of their rational will. In his novel The Raw Youth, Dostoevsky defends totally contrary position: only few “higher personalities” can immediately influence history by means of their great ideas, among which the religious ones play especially important role. The article shows that Dostoevsky’s critique had probably an impact on Tolstoy; as a result, in his late religious teaching, he adopted the position which he had previously rejected. Now he thinks that only few “best people” living in the strong compliance with the Jesus Christ’s doctrine direct society towards the way of spiritual perfectness and thus they determine the course of history. This general model of historical development of society can be named as “spiritual Empire” which is contrary to the accepted western liberal tradition generated by the philosophy of the Enlightenment. Within the model of “spiritual Empire”, the aim of the development is represented with the more and more spiritual unity of people and with the fact that everybody serve to the highest values (the creation of culture); such society should be ruled by the “highest personalities” who achieved the highest spiritual development and influence the society rather with the help of their spiritual authority than by means of the material power.

AB - The article proves the hypothesis that F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel The Raw Youth expresses the conception of history directed against the model proposed by L. N. Tolstoy in his War and Peace. Tolstoy maintains that the course of history is determined by the spontaneous interactions of elementary biological powers acting within individuals and within nations; he firmly rejects the idea that individuals can influence history by means of their rational will. In his novel The Raw Youth, Dostoevsky defends totally contrary position: only few “higher personalities” can immediately influence history by means of their great ideas, among which the religious ones play especially important role. The article shows that Dostoevsky’s critique had probably an impact on Tolstoy; as a result, in his late religious teaching, he adopted the position which he had previously rejected. Now he thinks that only few “best people” living in the strong compliance with the Jesus Christ’s doctrine direct society towards the way of spiritual perfectness and thus they determine the course of history. This general model of historical development of society can be named as “spiritual Empire” which is contrary to the accepted western liberal tradition generated by the philosophy of the Enlightenment. Within the model of “spiritual Empire”, the aim of the development is represented with the more and more spiritual unity of people and with the fact that everybody serve to the highest values (the creation of culture); such society should be ruled by the “highest personalities” who achieved the highest spiritual development and influence the society rather with the help of their spiritual authority than by means of the material power.

KW - Fyodor Dostoevsky

KW - Leo Tolstoy

KW - Russian philosophy of history

KW - empire

KW - liberalism and authoritarianism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142638371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e194da55-119a-3486-af9c-6d1d2086ae9b/

U2 - 10.21638/spbu17.2022.304

DO - 10.21638/spbu17.2022.304

M3 - статья

VL - 38

SP - 319

EP - 331

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

SN - 2542-2278

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 101266194