Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Современное состояние проблемы применения трансвагинальных сетчатых имплантов в хирургическом лечении стрессового недержания мочи и пролапса тазовых органов. / Shakhaliev, Rustam A.; Shulgin, Andrei S.; Kubin, Nikita D.; Kuzmina, Irina N.; Suchkov, Denis A.; Shkarupa, Dmitry D.
в: Gynecology, Том 24, № 3, 09.07.2022, стр. 174-180.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Современное состояние проблемы применения трансвагинальных сетчатых имплантов в хирургическом лечении стрессового недержания мочи и пролапса тазовых органов
AU - Shakhaliev, Rustam A.
AU - Shulgin, Andrei S.
AU - Kubin, Nikita D.
AU - Kuzmina, Irina N.
AU - Suchkov, Denis A.
AU - Shkarupa, Dmitry D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Е.М. Рычихина, 2022.
PY - 2022/7/9
Y1 - 2022/7/9
N2 - The use of synthetic implants in stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse surgery is being actively debated today, not only among experts in the field but also in the media, the patient community, and even in legal and political set. Such response has had a natural effect on the clinical application of the technology. An absurd situation is observed in some countries: the bans imposed by the authorities have directly or indirectly restricted patients' access to the most sophisticated technologies with proven efficacy. This literature review aims to systematize the perspectives of the scientific and regulatory communities in leading countries on the use of transvaginal mesh implants in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse.
AB - The use of synthetic implants in stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse surgery is being actively debated today, not only among experts in the field but also in the media, the patient community, and even in legal and political set. Such response has had a natural effect on the clinical application of the technology. An absurd situation is observed in some countries: the bans imposed by the authorities have directly or indirectly restricted patients' access to the most sophisticated technologies with proven efficacy. This literature review aims to systematize the perspectives of the scientific and regulatory communities in leading countries on the use of transvaginal mesh implants in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse.
KW - mesh implant
KW - pelvic prolapse
KW - stress urinary incontinence
KW - mesh implant
KW - pelvic prolapse
KW - stress urinary incontinence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135687670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5e0c53b6-9709-36c9-97fa-18e01153759d/
U2 - 10.26442/20795696.2022.3.201423
DO - 10.26442/20795696.2022.3.201423
M3 - статья
AN - SCOPUS:85135687670
VL - 24
SP - 174
EP - 180
JO - ГИНЕКОЛОГИЯ
JF - ГИНЕКОЛОГИЯ
SN - 2079-5696
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 98992637