Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
СРЕДНЕУРЕТРАЛЬНЫЙ СИНТЕТИЧЕСКИЙ СЛИНГ С ВОЗМОЖНОСТЬЮ РАННЕЙ МОБИЛИЗАЦИИ В ЛЕЧЕНИИ НЕДЕРЖАНИЯ МОЧИ ПРИ НАПРЯЖЕНИИ У ЖЕНЩИН. / Кубин, Никита Дмитриевич; Лабетов, Иван Антонович; Ковалев, Глеб Валерьевич; Шульгин, Андрей Сергеевич; Нуриев, Алексей Вадимович; Шкарупа, Дмитрий Дмитриевич.
в: Экспериментальная и клиническая урология, Том 16, № 2, 25.06.2023, стр. 152-159.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - СРЕДНЕУРЕТРАЛЬНЫЙ СИНТЕТИЧЕСКИЙ СЛИНГ С ВОЗМОЖНОСТЬЮ РАННЕЙ МОБИЛИЗАЦИИ В ЛЕЧЕНИИ НЕДЕРЖАНИЯ МОЧИ ПРИ НАПРЯЖЕНИИ У ЖЕНЩИН
AU - Кубин, Никита Дмитриевич
AU - Лабетов, Иван Антонович
AU - Ковалев, Глеб Валерьевич
AU - Шульгин, Андрей Сергеевич
AU - Нуриев, Алексей Вадимович
AU - Шкарупа, Дмитрий Дмитриевич
PY - 2023/6/25
Y1 - 2023/6/25
N2 - Introduction. The use of midurethral synthetic slings is currently considered to be the most widespread treatment option for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The most difficult in the existing approaches is to achieve the optimal tension of the sling, on which the result of treatment directly depends. To solve this problem, sling systems with the possibility of tension adjustment in the early postoperative period were created. A comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of such a system and a sling without the possibility of adjustment seems to be a relevant task. Materials and Methods. The study involved 320 female patients with a mean age of 55.2±11.2 years and a confirmed diagnosis of SUI. The patients were allocated into two groups: the first group underwent a synthetic suburethral sling by the standard technique (TOT); the second group received a suburethral sling with early mobilization (TTT). All patients underwent stress test, uroflowmetry and ultrasound investigation to determine the volume of residual urine. UDI-6, ICIQ-SF, PISQ-12 questionnaires were filled out to assess subjective efficiency. Results. In the second group, 28% of the patients needed to increase the tension of the prosthesis. Due to the possibility of tightening the sling in the early postoperative period, the operation was ineffective at the delayed follow-up stage at 36 months only in 11% of the women in the TTT group and in 32% of the patients in the LTT group, p
AB - Introduction. The use of midurethral synthetic slings is currently considered to be the most widespread treatment option for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The most difficult in the existing approaches is to achieve the optimal tension of the sling, on which the result of treatment directly depends. To solve this problem, sling systems with the possibility of tension adjustment in the early postoperative period were created. A comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of such a system and a sling without the possibility of adjustment seems to be a relevant task. Materials and Methods. The study involved 320 female patients with a mean age of 55.2±11.2 years and a confirmed diagnosis of SUI. The patients were allocated into two groups: the first group underwent a synthetic suburethral sling by the standard technique (TOT); the second group received a suburethral sling with early mobilization (TTT). All patients underwent stress test, uroflowmetry and ultrasound investigation to determine the volume of residual urine. UDI-6, ICIQ-SF, PISQ-12 questionnaires were filled out to assess subjective efficiency. Results. In the second group, 28% of the patients needed to increase the tension of the prosthesis. Due to the possibility of tightening the sling in the early postoperative period, the operation was ineffective at the delayed follow-up stage at 36 months only in 11% of the women in the TTT group and in 32% of the patients in the LTT group, p
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8ff34cca-9d87-33f8-926a-5d448373defa/
U2 - 10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-2-152-159
DO - 10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-2-152-159
M3 - статья
VL - 16
SP - 152
EP - 159
JO - Экспериментальная и клиническая урология
JF - Экспериментальная и клиническая урология
SN - 2222-8543
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 107677487