Standard

Свобода как произвол и понятие: основные формы сокрытия свободы в философской культуре России ХХ века. / Rybas, Alexander.

Acta Moralia Tyrnaviensia IX : Dráma slobody v slovanskom svete 20. storočia. Trnava : Trnavska univerzita v Trnave, 2019. стр. 21-41.

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийглава/разделнаучнаяРецензирование

Harvard

Rybas, A 2019, Свобода как произвол и понятие: основные формы сокрытия свободы в философской культуре России ХХ века. в Acta Moralia Tyrnaviensia IX : Dráma slobody v slovanskom svete 20. storočia. Trnavska univerzita v Trnave, Trnava, стр. 21-41.

APA

Rybas, A. (2019). Свобода как произвол и понятие: основные формы сокрытия свободы в философской культуре России ХХ века. в Acta Moralia Tyrnaviensia IX : Dráma slobody v slovanskom svete 20. storočia (стр. 21-41). Trnavska univerzita v Trnave.

Vancouver

Rybas A. Свобода как произвол и понятие: основные формы сокрытия свободы в философской культуре России ХХ века. в Acta Moralia Tyrnaviensia IX : Dráma slobody v slovanskom svete 20. storočia. Trnava: Trnavska univerzita v Trnave. 2019. стр. 21-41

Author

Rybas, Alexander. / Свобода как произвол и понятие: основные формы сокрытия свободы в философской культуре России ХХ века. Acta Moralia Tyrnaviensia IX : Dráma slobody v slovanskom svete 20. storočia. Trnava : Trnavska univerzita v Trnave, 2019. стр. 21-41

BibTeX

@inbook{ca9685276584406382dea0b026e326d5,
title = "Свобода как произвол и понятие: основные формы сокрытия свободы в философской культуре России ХХ века",
abstract = "The article deals with the two main ways of interpreting freedom in the Russian philosophical culture of the 20th century: 1) through the conceptualization of the positive content of freedom, as a result of which it turns into a concept, an element of a philosophical doctrine; 2) through the negation of any positive content, which led to the identification of freedom with necessity. The thesis is proved that both of these ways of considering freedom made it impossible for the real problem of freedom to be under the philosophical research in Russia. By means of analyzing the concepts of freedom created by both religious and Soviet philosophers, the author shows that despite the fundamental difference in their positions, they all tried to do the same, that is to interpret freedom as a necessity. This is explained, in the author{\textquoteright}s opinion, by the fact that both the religious-Orthodox and the Marxist-Soviet philosophical traditions in Russia focused on creating generalizing discourses, the structure of which initially excludes the possibility of grasping freedom.",
author = "Alexander Rybas",
year = "2019",
language = "русский",
isbn = "978-83-8111-119-5",
pages = "21--41",
booktitle = "Acta Moralia Tyrnaviensia IX",
publisher = "Trnavska univerzita v Trnave",
address = "Словакия",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Свобода как произвол и понятие: основные формы сокрытия свободы в философской культуре России ХХ века

AU - Rybas, Alexander

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The article deals with the two main ways of interpreting freedom in the Russian philosophical culture of the 20th century: 1) through the conceptualization of the positive content of freedom, as a result of which it turns into a concept, an element of a philosophical doctrine; 2) through the negation of any positive content, which led to the identification of freedom with necessity. The thesis is proved that both of these ways of considering freedom made it impossible for the real problem of freedom to be under the philosophical research in Russia. By means of analyzing the concepts of freedom created by both religious and Soviet philosophers, the author shows that despite the fundamental difference in their positions, they all tried to do the same, that is to interpret freedom as a necessity. This is explained, in the author’s opinion, by the fact that both the religious-Orthodox and the Marxist-Soviet philosophical traditions in Russia focused on creating generalizing discourses, the structure of which initially excludes the possibility of grasping freedom.

AB - The article deals with the two main ways of interpreting freedom in the Russian philosophical culture of the 20th century: 1) through the conceptualization of the positive content of freedom, as a result of which it turns into a concept, an element of a philosophical doctrine; 2) through the negation of any positive content, which led to the identification of freedom with necessity. The thesis is proved that both of these ways of considering freedom made it impossible for the real problem of freedom to be under the philosophical research in Russia. By means of analyzing the concepts of freedom created by both religious and Soviet philosophers, the author shows that despite the fundamental difference in their positions, they all tried to do the same, that is to interpret freedom as a necessity. This is explained, in the author’s opinion, by the fact that both the religious-Orthodox and the Marxist-Soviet philosophical traditions in Russia focused on creating generalizing discourses, the structure of which initially excludes the possibility of grasping freedom.

M3 - глава/раздел

SN - 978-83-8111-119-5

SP - 21

EP - 41

BT - Acta Moralia Tyrnaviensia IX

PB - Trnavska univerzita v Trnave

CY - Trnava

ER -

ID: 48638259