Standard

О случайности, изменчивости и направленности в эволюции. Стоит ли сталкивать лбами приобретенные и унаследованные признаки? / Даев, Евгений Владиславович.

в: ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕНЕТИКА, Том 20, № 2, 09.09.2022, стр. 141-150.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Даев, ЕВ 2022, 'О случайности, изменчивости и направленности в эволюции. Стоит ли сталкивать лбами приобретенные и унаследованные признаки?', ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕНЕТИКА, Том. 20, № 2, стр. 141-150. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen106291

APA

Даев, Е. В. (2022). О случайности, изменчивости и направленности в эволюции. Стоит ли сталкивать лбами приобретенные и унаследованные признаки? ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕНЕТИКА, 20(2), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen106291

Vancouver

Даев ЕВ. О случайности, изменчивости и направленности в эволюции. Стоит ли сталкивать лбами приобретенные и унаследованные признаки? ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕНЕТИКА. 2022 Сент. 9;20(2):141-150. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen106291

Author

Даев, Евгений Владиславович. / О случайности, изменчивости и направленности в эволюции. Стоит ли сталкивать лбами приобретенные и унаследованные признаки?. в: ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕНЕТИКА. 2022 ; Том 20, № 2. стр. 141-150.

BibTeX

@article{a25cf664ea2342f49c51701955b642ae,
title = "О случайности, изменчивости и направленности в эволюции. Стоит ли сталкивать лбами приобретенные и унаследованные признаки?",
abstract = "It seems, that historically the problem of oppose inherited features vs acquired is mainly two-causes problem. The first is an insufficient knowledge about mechanisms how acquired phenotypic feature could became inherited. The second is semiotic or more precisely semantic. Any “language itself contained the seeds of the problem” because of ambiguous interpreting of same terms by different scientists. Human specific understanding of any term, which depends on their different education, specificity of different languages, usage of metaphors and analogies, etc., create “unintended illusions” of real truth. This brief theoretical study attempts to consider adaptively significant traits as gradually moving from the category of non-heritable to heritable ones. The conceptual approach used makes it possible to erase the contradictions between the interrelated concepts of “acquired” and “inherited” features.",
keywords = "случайность; изменчивость; направленность эволюции; приобретенные признаки; унаследованные признаки; семиотика; семантика, acquired features, semantics, variability, semiotics, directed evolution, inherited features, spontaneity, acquired features, directed evolution, inherited features, semantics, semiotics, spontaneity, variability",
author = "Даев, {Евгений Владиславович}",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "9",
doi = "10.17816/ecogen106291",
language = "русский",
volume = "20",
pages = "141--150",
journal = "ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕНЕТИКА",
issn = "1811-0932",
publisher = "Эко-Вектор",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - О случайности, изменчивости и направленности в эволюции. Стоит ли сталкивать лбами приобретенные и унаследованные признаки?

AU - Даев, Евгений Владиславович

PY - 2022/9/9

Y1 - 2022/9/9

N2 - It seems, that historically the problem of oppose inherited features vs acquired is mainly two-causes problem. The first is an insufficient knowledge about mechanisms how acquired phenotypic feature could became inherited. The second is semiotic or more precisely semantic. Any “language itself contained the seeds of the problem” because of ambiguous interpreting of same terms by different scientists. Human specific understanding of any term, which depends on their different education, specificity of different languages, usage of metaphors and analogies, etc., create “unintended illusions” of real truth. This brief theoretical study attempts to consider adaptively significant traits as gradually moving from the category of non-heritable to heritable ones. The conceptual approach used makes it possible to erase the contradictions between the interrelated concepts of “acquired” and “inherited” features.

AB - It seems, that historically the problem of oppose inherited features vs acquired is mainly two-causes problem. The first is an insufficient knowledge about mechanisms how acquired phenotypic feature could became inherited. The second is semiotic or more precisely semantic. Any “language itself contained the seeds of the problem” because of ambiguous interpreting of same terms by different scientists. Human specific understanding of any term, which depends on their different education, specificity of different languages, usage of metaphors and analogies, etc., create “unintended illusions” of real truth. This brief theoretical study attempts to consider adaptively significant traits as gradually moving from the category of non-heritable to heritable ones. The conceptual approach used makes it possible to erase the contradictions between the interrelated concepts of “acquired” and “inherited” features.

KW - случайность; изменчивость; направленность эволюции; приобретенные признаки; унаследованные признаки; семиотика; семантика

KW - acquired features

KW - semantics

KW - variability

KW - semiotics

KW - directed evolution

KW - inherited features

KW - spontaneity

KW - acquired features

KW - directed evolution

KW - inherited features

KW - semantics

KW - semiotics

KW - spontaneity

KW - variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140215911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5de732ae-edf9-3fb6-8ff4-17e5a4e87d8c/

U2 - 10.17816/ecogen106291

DO - 10.17816/ecogen106291

M3 - статья

VL - 20

SP - 141

EP - 150

JO - ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕНЕТИКА

JF - ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕНЕТИКА

SN - 1811-0932

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 101042974