TY - JOUR

T1 - Способны ли люди различать перцептивную и концептуальную беглость? Исследование на примере методики научения искусственной грамматике

AU - Zverev, Ilia

AU - Moroshkina, Nadezhda

N1 - Funding Information: The reported study was funded by the RFBR according to the research project N 20-013-00532. Исследование выполнено при поддержке РФФИ, проект № 20-013-00532. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/3/30

Y1 - 2022/3/30

N2 - The heuristic of information processing fluency plays an important role in making judgments. Some sources of processing fluency can be relevant or irrelevant to the content of a judgment. In this study, we aim to check whether individuals can distinguish different sources of fluency or fluency has a general effect on judgments. We used an artificial grammar learning paradigm (AGL) and tested the effects of different fluency sources (grammaticality and perceptual noise) on the judgment of grammaticality or of subjective ease of reading. It was found that both grammaticality and perceptual noise affected grammaticality judgements: the grammatical and the less noisy strings were evaluated more often as grammatical. However, only the perceptual noise affected judgments of subjective ease of reading. The results obtained provide evidence that fluency may contribute to the effects of implicit learning. It is possible that the processing fluency heuristic is the additional factor of judgement in the lack of explicit knowledge. Perhaps, perceptual noise provided almost complete explicit information for judgment of ease of reading; hence there was no need for additional heuristics. Another possible explanation is that perceptual fluency sources affect the early stages of information processing in a mandatory manner, unlike the conceptual ones. Overall, results are better explained by the non-specificity fluency hypothesis supporting the impossibility to distinguish between different fluency sources.

AB - The heuristic of information processing fluency plays an important role in making judgments. Some sources of processing fluency can be relevant or irrelevant to the content of a judgment. In this study, we aim to check whether individuals can distinguish different sources of fluency or fluency has a general effect on judgments. We used an artificial grammar learning paradigm (AGL) and tested the effects of different fluency sources (grammaticality and perceptual noise) on the judgment of grammaticality or of subjective ease of reading. It was found that both grammaticality and perceptual noise affected grammaticality judgements: the grammatical and the less noisy strings were evaluated more often as grammatical. However, only the perceptual noise affected judgments of subjective ease of reading. The results obtained provide evidence that fluency may contribute to the effects of implicit learning. It is possible that the processing fluency heuristic is the additional factor of judgement in the lack of explicit knowledge. Perhaps, perceptual noise provided almost complete explicit information for judgment of ease of reading; hence there was no need for additional heuristics. Another possible explanation is that perceptual fluency sources affect the early stages of information processing in a mandatory manner, unlike the conceptual ones. Overall, results are better explained by the non-specificity fluency hypothesis supporting the impossibility to distinguish between different fluency sources.

KW - artificial grammar learning

KW - implicit learning

KW - information processing fluency

KW - metacognitive experiences

KW - implicit learning

KW - information processing fluency

KW - metacognitive experiences

KW - Artificial grammar learning

KW - artificial grammar learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129789007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1ee6c8d0-c99d-3a0a-a834-d36e82f45b2d/

U2 - 10.17323/1813-8918-2022-1-150-168

DO - 10.17323/1813-8918-2022-1-150-168

M3 - статья

VL - 19

SP - 150

EP - 168

JO - ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. ЖУРНАЛ ВЫСШЕЙ ШКОЛЫ ЭКОНОМИКИ

JF - ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. ЖУРНАЛ ВЫСШЕЙ ШКОЛЫ ЭКОНОМИКИ

SN - 1813-8918

IS - 1

ER -