Standard

Государства с ограниченным признанием во внешней политике Российской Федерации: сравнительный анализ основных черт. / Ягья, Ватаняр Саидович; Антонова, Ирина Александровна.

в: СРАВНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА, Том 11, № 4, 2020, стр. 92-105.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{bbc0fb2800f441ce89b5901a0ec94b8a,
title = "Государства с ограниченным признанием во внешней политике Российской Федерации: сравнительный анализ основных черт",
abstract = "The main goal of the paper is to reveal, to compare and to summarize the essence of Russian political approaches toward particular cases of states with limited recognition and also to define in global scale whether the stance undergoes transformation or it could be considered as an attitude unique in each special matter when Moscow simultaneously supports independence of South Caucasian Republics and does not recognize Kosovo. The authors believe that there is strong need for Russia of an elaborated strategy based on a robust academic research. The authors outline two defacto approaches to secessionist formations practically applied by contemporary members of international society: international law approach and geopolitical approach. Summing up all the peculiarities of Russian position they assert that Moscow mostly keeps to geopolitical approach towards factual secessions rather international law approach, but in case of Kosovo, Palestine, South Ossetia and Abkhazia it resorts to international law approach. The authors also provisionally divide all contemporary secessionist formations in Russian policy into three groups according to priority ranking and provide results of a detailed content-analysis of Russian foreign policy formal documents and politicians statements that reveal a wide range of appellations concerning secessionist formations. The characteristics testify the fact that Russia strictly keeps to the position of territorial integrity principle respect. Finally, the authors produce two forecasts of further Russian policy towards factual secessions and conclude that Russian policy of consideration each factual secession should continue being individual as fruitful, consistent, deliberate and ensuring more profitable conditions in the context of international cooperation and security.",
keywords = "states with limited recognition, unrecognized states, diplomatic recognition, secessionist formations, Russian foreign policy, territorial integrity, right to self-determination",
author = "Ягья, {Ватаняр Саидович} and Антонова, {Ирина Александровна}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10051",
language = "русский",
volume = "11",
pages = "92--105",
journal = "СРАВНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА",
issn = "2221-3279",
publisher = "Издательская группа «Юрист»",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Государства с ограниченным признанием во внешней политике Российской Федерации: сравнительный анализ основных черт

AU - Ягья, Ватаняр Саидович

AU - Антонова, Ирина Александровна

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The main goal of the paper is to reveal, to compare and to summarize the essence of Russian political approaches toward particular cases of states with limited recognition and also to define in global scale whether the stance undergoes transformation or it could be considered as an attitude unique in each special matter when Moscow simultaneously supports independence of South Caucasian Republics and does not recognize Kosovo. The authors believe that there is strong need for Russia of an elaborated strategy based on a robust academic research. The authors outline two defacto approaches to secessionist formations practically applied by contemporary members of international society: international law approach and geopolitical approach. Summing up all the peculiarities of Russian position they assert that Moscow mostly keeps to geopolitical approach towards factual secessions rather international law approach, but in case of Kosovo, Palestine, South Ossetia and Abkhazia it resorts to international law approach. The authors also provisionally divide all contemporary secessionist formations in Russian policy into three groups according to priority ranking and provide results of a detailed content-analysis of Russian foreign policy formal documents and politicians statements that reveal a wide range of appellations concerning secessionist formations. The characteristics testify the fact that Russia strictly keeps to the position of territorial integrity principle respect. Finally, the authors produce two forecasts of further Russian policy towards factual secessions and conclude that Russian policy of consideration each factual secession should continue being individual as fruitful, consistent, deliberate and ensuring more profitable conditions in the context of international cooperation and security.

AB - The main goal of the paper is to reveal, to compare and to summarize the essence of Russian political approaches toward particular cases of states with limited recognition and also to define in global scale whether the stance undergoes transformation or it could be considered as an attitude unique in each special matter when Moscow simultaneously supports independence of South Caucasian Republics and does not recognize Kosovo. The authors believe that there is strong need for Russia of an elaborated strategy based on a robust academic research. The authors outline two defacto approaches to secessionist formations practically applied by contemporary members of international society: international law approach and geopolitical approach. Summing up all the peculiarities of Russian position they assert that Moscow mostly keeps to geopolitical approach towards factual secessions rather international law approach, but in case of Kosovo, Palestine, South Ossetia and Abkhazia it resorts to international law approach. The authors also provisionally divide all contemporary secessionist formations in Russian policy into three groups according to priority ranking and provide results of a detailed content-analysis of Russian foreign policy formal documents and politicians statements that reveal a wide range of appellations concerning secessionist formations. The characteristics testify the fact that Russia strictly keeps to the position of territorial integrity principle respect. Finally, the authors produce two forecasts of further Russian policy towards factual secessions and conclude that Russian policy of consideration each factual secession should continue being individual as fruitful, consistent, deliberate and ensuring more profitable conditions in the context of international cooperation and security.

KW - states with limited recognition

KW - unrecognized states

KW - diplomatic recognition

KW - secessionist formations

KW - Russian foreign policy

KW - territorial integrity

KW - right to self-determination

U2 - 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10051

DO - 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10051

M3 - статья

VL - 11

SP - 92

EP - 105

JO - СРАВНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА

JF - СРАВНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА

SN - 2221-3279

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 71496134