Standard

Теоретические гуманитарные науки (по материалам рукописи Н.И. Кареева «Общая методология гуманитарных наук»). / Dolgova, Evgeniya A.; Malinov, Alexey V.; Sliskova, Valeriya V.

в: ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ, Том 2021, № 5, 2021, стр. 94-107.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{f8b672c955b64e4c9c8659298b205905,
title = "Теоретические гуманитарные науки (по материалам рукописи Н.И. Кареева «Общая методология гуманитарных наук»)",
abstract = "The article deals with the philosophical and methodological views of N.I. Kareev (1850–1931) whose name was usually associated with World History studies. Based on the materials of the partially published work “General Methodology of Humanities”, the authors put the question of the relevance of Kareev{\textquoteright}s theoretical and methodological research at the time of paper{\textquoteright}s writing. The authors note that Kareev interpreted the concept of “humanities” as broadly as possible. This concept includes the Social Studies, which he opposed to the Natural sciences and set them apart from the “cultural”. It can be considered that Kareev{\textquoteright}s enthusiasm for the philosophical theories was caused by his personal interest and the necessity of historiography to justify its scientific and cognitive status. The article is accompanied by the extract of the sixth chapter “Theoretical Humanities” of the work “General Methodology of Humanities” dedicated to the theoretical problems of studying the phenomena that represent the subjects of the humanities. In the published fragments Kareev tried to trace how these two directions were formed in the humanities: the theoretical (deductive method) and the historical (inductive method). He interpreted the development of science as a transition from metaphysics to empirical knowledge based on facts. The authors conclude that by the time the text was prepared (early 1920s), Kareev{\textquoteright}s approach was perceived as outdated.",
keywords = "Кареев, гуманитарные науки, методология науки, Comparative-historical method, Historicism, Humanities, Kareev, Methodology, Philosophy of history, Positivism, philosophy of history, positivism, historicism, comparative-historical method, methodology",
author = "Dolgova, {Evgeniya A.} and Malinov, {Alexey V.} and Sliskova, {Valeriya V.}",
note = "Funding Information: *This article has been prepared with financial support of the Russian Foundation for the Basic Research (RFBF), science project No. 19-09-00109\1, “Methodological studies by Nikolay I. Kareev: research, publication, comments”. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021,Russian Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.21146/0042-8744-2021-5-94-107",
language = "русский",
volume = "2021",
pages = "94--107",
journal = "ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ",
issn = "0042-8744",
publisher = "Международная книга",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Теоретические гуманитарные науки (по материалам рукописи Н.И. Кареева «Общая методология гуманитарных наук»)

AU - Dolgova, Evgeniya A.

AU - Malinov, Alexey V.

AU - Sliskova, Valeriya V.

N1 - Funding Information: *This article has been prepared with financial support of the Russian Foundation for the Basic Research (RFBF), science project No. 19-09-00109\1, “Methodological studies by Nikolay I. Kareev: research, publication, comments”. Publisher Copyright: © 2021,Russian Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The article deals with the philosophical and methodological views of N.I. Kareev (1850–1931) whose name was usually associated with World History studies. Based on the materials of the partially published work “General Methodology of Humanities”, the authors put the question of the relevance of Kareev’s theoretical and methodological research at the time of paper’s writing. The authors note that Kareev interpreted the concept of “humanities” as broadly as possible. This concept includes the Social Studies, which he opposed to the Natural sciences and set them apart from the “cultural”. It can be considered that Kareev’s enthusiasm for the philosophical theories was caused by his personal interest and the necessity of historiography to justify its scientific and cognitive status. The article is accompanied by the extract of the sixth chapter “Theoretical Humanities” of the work “General Methodology of Humanities” dedicated to the theoretical problems of studying the phenomena that represent the subjects of the humanities. In the published fragments Kareev tried to trace how these two directions were formed in the humanities: the theoretical (deductive method) and the historical (inductive method). He interpreted the development of science as a transition from metaphysics to empirical knowledge based on facts. The authors conclude that by the time the text was prepared (early 1920s), Kareev’s approach was perceived as outdated.

AB - The article deals with the philosophical and methodological views of N.I. Kareev (1850–1931) whose name was usually associated with World History studies. Based on the materials of the partially published work “General Methodology of Humanities”, the authors put the question of the relevance of Kareev’s theoretical and methodological research at the time of paper’s writing. The authors note that Kareev interpreted the concept of “humanities” as broadly as possible. This concept includes the Social Studies, which he opposed to the Natural sciences and set them apart from the “cultural”. It can be considered that Kareev’s enthusiasm for the philosophical theories was caused by his personal interest and the necessity of historiography to justify its scientific and cognitive status. The article is accompanied by the extract of the sixth chapter “Theoretical Humanities” of the work “General Methodology of Humanities” dedicated to the theoretical problems of studying the phenomena that represent the subjects of the humanities. In the published fragments Kareev tried to trace how these two directions were formed in the humanities: the theoretical (deductive method) and the historical (inductive method). He interpreted the development of science as a transition from metaphysics to empirical knowledge based on facts. The authors conclude that by the time the text was prepared (early 1920s), Kareev’s approach was perceived as outdated.

KW - Кареев, гуманитарные науки, методология науки

KW - Comparative-historical method

KW - Historicism

KW - Humanities

KW - Kareev

KW - Methodology

KW - Philosophy of history

KW - Positivism

KW - philosophy of history

KW - positivism

KW - historicism

KW - comparative-historical method

KW - methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107485362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5f7581bb-76dd-3e15-9927-873b9c347acd/

U2 - 10.21146/0042-8744-2021-5-94-107

DO - 10.21146/0042-8744-2021-5-94-107

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85107485362

VL - 2021

SP - 94

EP - 107

JO - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ

JF - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ

SN - 0042-8744

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 76942121