Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Теолого-натурфилософский монизм Ксенофана Колофонского, засвидетельство-ванный в трудах Аристотеля, Цицерона и Секста Эмпирика... / Тантлевский, Игорь Романович.
в: ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ, Том 2018, № 3, 2018, стр. 118-128.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Теолого-натурфилософский монизм Ксенофана Колофонского, засвидетельство-ванный в трудах Аристотеля, Цицерона и Секста Эмпирика...
AU - Тантлевский, Игорь Романович
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The author reveals basic aspects of Xenophanes of Colophon’s natural-philosophical monism as attested in the writings of ancient authors, especially in those of Aristotle, Cicero and Sextus Empiricus, and compares his concept of a “single”, “eternal”, “infinite” (see: Cicero. On the Nature of the Gods, I, 11, 28) and “rational” god/the Universe (“nature”) with a number of key aspects of Spinoza’s panentheistic doctrine of the single substance – “God, or Nature” (the Universe). Since, on the one hand, Spinoza’s personal library included Aristotle’s works translated into Latin and the Thesaurus Ciceronianus containing, in particular, the passages on Xenophanes’s doctrine from Cicero’s treatises, and, on the other hand, some printed editions of the Latin translations of Sextus Empiricus’s works were widely available in his time, one can assume that Spinoza could be familiar with Xenophanes’s natural-philosophical conception.
AB - The author reveals basic aspects of Xenophanes of Colophon’s natural-philosophical monism as attested in the writings of ancient authors, especially in those of Aristotle, Cicero and Sextus Empiricus, and compares his concept of a “single”, “eternal”, “infinite” (see: Cicero. On the Nature of the Gods, I, 11, 28) and “rational” god/the Universe (“nature”) with a number of key aspects of Spinoza’s panentheistic doctrine of the single substance – “God, or Nature” (the Universe). Since, on the one hand, Spinoza’s personal library included Aristotle’s works translated into Latin and the Thesaurus Ciceronianus containing, in particular, the passages on Xenophanes’s doctrine from Cicero’s treatises, and, on the other hand, some printed editions of the Latin translations of Sextus Empiricus’s works were widely available in his time, one can assume that Spinoza could be familiar with Xenophanes’s natural-philosophical conception.
KW - Aristotle
KW - Cicero
KW - Diogenes laërtius
KW - Natural-philosophical monism
KW - Pantheism
KW - Sextus empiricus
KW - Spinoza
KW - Xenophanes of colophon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048149437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - статья
AN - SCOPUS:85048149437
VL - 2018
SP - 118
EP - 128
JO - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ
JF - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ
SN - 0042-8744
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 18141684