Standard

Петроградская группа прогрессивного духовенства и советская конфессиональная политика периода Гражданской войны. / Krapivin, Mikhail Yu.

в: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ, Том 65, № 2, 2020, стр. 392-408.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{671b0ee83c314114b1f837ee4044db1c,
title = "Петроградская группа прогрессивного духовенства и советская конфессиональная политика периода Гражданской войны",
abstract = "In June - July 1919, informal consultations between representatives of the authorities and a group of “progressive” Orthodox clergy were held in the premises of the Executive Committee of the Petrograd Council. They discussed the possibility of publishing an appeal on behalf of the invited persons condemning the actions of the White Guards and interventionists as well as expressing solidarity with the Bolsheviks in their struggle against external enemies. Meetings with the clergy were organized by the leadership of the so-called Common sub-department of the Petrograd city department of justice. This kind of initiative contradicted the state policy in the religious issue. At the same time, it corresponded to the directives of the Secret Department of the Cheka. The article describes the course and results of the “private meeting” of the summer of 1919; analyzes the proposals made by its participants, and the variants of the text of the final document discussed at the meetings. In the end, most of the invitees felt that the clergy's performance with a politicized declaration was contrary to the Decree on the separation of church and state and therefore unacceptable. The history of the “consultations” that once took place in the Common sub-department unexpectedly became the subject of a “discussion” that unfolded in the spring and summer of 1921 between investigators of the Petrograd Provincial Cheka and a participant in the “private meetings” of 1919, one of the leaders of Renovationism in the Russian Church A. I. Boyarsky. The struggle to establish the truth brought about criminal prosecution and prison sentences for the archpriest.",
keywords = "A. I. Boyarsky, Civil war, Orthodox Russian Church, Petrograd Provincial Emergency Commission, Petrosovet, Progressive clergy, A. I. Boyarsky, Civil war, Orthodox Russian Church, Petrograd Provincial Emergency Commission, Petrosovet, Progressive clergy",
author = "Krapivin, {Mikhail Yu}",
note = "Funding Information: Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научно-исследователь-ского проекта № 18-09-00299 А. The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research in the framework of the research project No. 18-09-00299 A. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Saint Petersburg State University. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.21638/11701/SPBU02.2020.204",
language = "русский",
volume = "65",
pages = "392--408",
journal = "ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ",
issn = "1812-9323",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Петроградская группа прогрессивного духовенства и советская конфессиональная политика периода Гражданской войны

AU - Krapivin, Mikhail Yu

N1 - Funding Information: Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научно-исследователь-ского проекта № 18-09-00299 А. The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research in the framework of the research project No. 18-09-00299 A. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Saint Petersburg State University. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In June - July 1919, informal consultations between representatives of the authorities and a group of “progressive” Orthodox clergy were held in the premises of the Executive Committee of the Petrograd Council. They discussed the possibility of publishing an appeal on behalf of the invited persons condemning the actions of the White Guards and interventionists as well as expressing solidarity with the Bolsheviks in their struggle against external enemies. Meetings with the clergy were organized by the leadership of the so-called Common sub-department of the Petrograd city department of justice. This kind of initiative contradicted the state policy in the religious issue. At the same time, it corresponded to the directives of the Secret Department of the Cheka. The article describes the course and results of the “private meeting” of the summer of 1919; analyzes the proposals made by its participants, and the variants of the text of the final document discussed at the meetings. In the end, most of the invitees felt that the clergy's performance with a politicized declaration was contrary to the Decree on the separation of church and state and therefore unacceptable. The history of the “consultations” that once took place in the Common sub-department unexpectedly became the subject of a “discussion” that unfolded in the spring and summer of 1921 between investigators of the Petrograd Provincial Cheka and a participant in the “private meetings” of 1919, one of the leaders of Renovationism in the Russian Church A. I. Boyarsky. The struggle to establish the truth brought about criminal prosecution and prison sentences for the archpriest.

AB - In June - July 1919, informal consultations between representatives of the authorities and a group of “progressive” Orthodox clergy were held in the premises of the Executive Committee of the Petrograd Council. They discussed the possibility of publishing an appeal on behalf of the invited persons condemning the actions of the White Guards and interventionists as well as expressing solidarity with the Bolsheviks in their struggle against external enemies. Meetings with the clergy were organized by the leadership of the so-called Common sub-department of the Petrograd city department of justice. This kind of initiative contradicted the state policy in the religious issue. At the same time, it corresponded to the directives of the Secret Department of the Cheka. The article describes the course and results of the “private meeting” of the summer of 1919; analyzes the proposals made by its participants, and the variants of the text of the final document discussed at the meetings. In the end, most of the invitees felt that the clergy's performance with a politicized declaration was contrary to the Decree on the separation of church and state and therefore unacceptable. The history of the “consultations” that once took place in the Common sub-department unexpectedly became the subject of a “discussion” that unfolded in the spring and summer of 1921 between investigators of the Petrograd Provincial Cheka and a participant in the “private meetings” of 1919, one of the leaders of Renovationism in the Russian Church A. I. Boyarsky. The struggle to establish the truth brought about criminal prosecution and prison sentences for the archpriest.

KW - A. I. Boyarsky

KW - Civil war

KW - Orthodox Russian Church

KW - Petrograd Provincial Emergency Commission

KW - Petrosovet

KW - Progressive clergy

KW - A. I. Boyarsky

KW - Civil war

KW - Orthodox Russian Church

KW - Petrograd Provincial Emergency Commission

KW - Petrosovet

KW - Progressive clergy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090526297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5091138a-323f-3086-bb1f-0e50f200e95f/

U2 - 10.21638/11701/SPBU02.2020.204

DO - 10.21638/11701/SPBU02.2020.204

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85090526297

VL - 65

SP - 392

EP - 408

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ

SN - 1812-9323

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 71422040