Standard

Противодействие замещению собственного капитала заемным для целей налогообложения: зарубежная практика. / Покровская, Наталья Владимировна; Хмелинина, Мария Андреевна.

в: Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования, Том 6, № 1(21), 2020, стр. 301-321.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Покровская, НВ & Хмелинина, МА 2020, 'Противодействие замещению собственного капитала заемным для целей налогообложения: зарубежная практика', Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования, Том. 6, № 1(21), стр. 301-321. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-301-321

APA

Покровская, Н. В., & Хмелинина, М. А. (2020). Противодействие замещению собственного капитала заемным для целей налогообложения: зарубежная практика. Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования, 6(1(21)), 301-321. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-301-321

Vancouver

Покровская НВ, Хмелинина МА. Противодействие замещению собственного капитала заемным для целей налогообложения: зарубежная практика. Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования. 2020;6(1(21)):301-321. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-301-321

Author

Покровская, Наталья Владимировна ; Хмелинина, Мария Андреевна. / Противодействие замещению собственного капитала заемным для целей налогообложения: зарубежная практика. в: Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования. 2020 ; Том 6, № 1(21). стр. 301-321.

BibTeX

@article{c0e326bc4988403086063afceb37562e,
title = "Противодействие замещению собственного капитала заемным для целей налогообложения: зарубежная практика",
abstract = "The movement of capital within an international group of companies allows not only optimizing business processes, it may also serve to reduce tax liabilities. To effectively counter this phenomenon, international initiatives are being created to coordinate the actions of countries. The aim of this study is to characterize the experience of applying the thin capitalization rules and earnings stripping rules when implementing an intragroup loan. This paper describes the tools to counter the replacement of equity with borrowed capital for tax purposes in the OECD recommendations, as well as corporate taxation practices in 151 countries in 2019-2020. The rules for regulating intra-group financing for tax purposes have been introduced by a predominant number of countries, while thin capitalization rules are more common than the limit on interest. National rules for thin capitalization and earnings stripping vary by a number of parameters, including by scope and tax implications. The greatest differences are observed in the key fixed ratio of borrowed and own capital and the nature of restrictions on the interest. The authors{\textquoteright} hypothesis about a high degree of convergence of national rules for regulating thin capitalization and earnings stripping rules with the recommendations of the OECD has not been fully confirmed. However, the trends of the second half of the 2010s confirmed the second hypothesis that in developed countries there is a gradual transition from thin capitalization rules to earnings stripping rules in accordance with BEPS actions.",
author = "Покровская, {Наталья Владимировна} and Хмелинина, {Мария Андреевна}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-301-321",
language = "русский",
volume = "6",
pages = "301--321",
journal = "Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования",
issn = "2411-7897",
publisher = "Тюменский государственный университет",
number = "1(21)",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Противодействие замещению собственного капитала заемным для целей налогообложения: зарубежная практика

AU - Покровская, Наталья Владимировна

AU - Хмелинина, Мария Андреевна

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The movement of capital within an international group of companies allows not only optimizing business processes, it may also serve to reduce tax liabilities. To effectively counter this phenomenon, international initiatives are being created to coordinate the actions of countries. The aim of this study is to characterize the experience of applying the thin capitalization rules and earnings stripping rules when implementing an intragroup loan. This paper describes the tools to counter the replacement of equity with borrowed capital for tax purposes in the OECD recommendations, as well as corporate taxation practices in 151 countries in 2019-2020. The rules for regulating intra-group financing for tax purposes have been introduced by a predominant number of countries, while thin capitalization rules are more common than the limit on interest. National rules for thin capitalization and earnings stripping vary by a number of parameters, including by scope and tax implications. The greatest differences are observed in the key fixed ratio of borrowed and own capital and the nature of restrictions on the interest. The authors’ hypothesis about a high degree of convergence of national rules for regulating thin capitalization and earnings stripping rules with the recommendations of the OECD has not been fully confirmed. However, the trends of the second half of the 2010s confirmed the second hypothesis that in developed countries there is a gradual transition from thin capitalization rules to earnings stripping rules in accordance with BEPS actions.

AB - The movement of capital within an international group of companies allows not only optimizing business processes, it may also serve to reduce tax liabilities. To effectively counter this phenomenon, international initiatives are being created to coordinate the actions of countries. The aim of this study is to characterize the experience of applying the thin capitalization rules and earnings stripping rules when implementing an intragroup loan. This paper describes the tools to counter the replacement of equity with borrowed capital for tax purposes in the OECD recommendations, as well as corporate taxation practices in 151 countries in 2019-2020. The rules for regulating intra-group financing for tax purposes have been introduced by a predominant number of countries, while thin capitalization rules are more common than the limit on interest. National rules for thin capitalization and earnings stripping vary by a number of parameters, including by scope and tax implications. The greatest differences are observed in the key fixed ratio of borrowed and own capital and the nature of restrictions on the interest. The authors’ hypothesis about a high degree of convergence of national rules for regulating thin capitalization and earnings stripping rules with the recommendations of the OECD has not been fully confirmed. However, the trends of the second half of the 2010s confirmed the second hypothesis that in developed countries there is a gradual transition from thin capitalization rules to earnings stripping rules in accordance with BEPS actions.

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ecdee567-afe3-312c-aecb-84a312002842/

U2 - 10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-301-321

DO - 10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-301-321

M3 - статья

VL - 6

SP - 301

EP - 321

JO - Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования

JF - Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования

SN - 2411-7897

IS - 1(21)

ER -

ID: 71512726