Standard

СЛОЖНОСТИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗНОЙ ЭМПИЕМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ И МЕЗОТЕЛИОМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ. / Smolnikova, U. A.; Gavrilov, P. V.; Ushkov, A. D.; Vasilyev, I. V.; Avetisyan, A. O.

в: Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology, Том 9, № 1, 01.01.2019, стр. 256-260.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Smolnikova, UA, Gavrilov, PV, Ushkov, AD, Vasilyev, IV & Avetisyan, AO 2019, 'СЛОЖНОСТИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗНОЙ ЭМПИЕМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ И МЕЗОТЕЛИОМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ', Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology, Том. 9, № 1, стр. 256-260. https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-1-256-260

APA

Smolnikova, U. A., Gavrilov, P. V., Ushkov, A. D., Vasilyev, I. V., & Avetisyan, A. O. (2019). СЛОЖНОСТИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗНОЙ ЭМПИЕМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ И МЕЗОТЕЛИОМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology, 9(1), 256-260. https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-1-256-260

Vancouver

Smolnikova UA, Gavrilov PV, Ushkov AD, Vasilyev IV, Avetisyan AO. СЛОЖНОСТИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗНОЙ ЭМПИЕМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ И МЕЗОТЕЛИОМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. 2019 Янв. 1;9(1):256-260. https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-1-256-260

Author

Smolnikova, U. A. ; Gavrilov, P. V. ; Ushkov, A. D. ; Vasilyev, I. V. ; Avetisyan, A. O. / СЛОЖНОСТИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗНОЙ ЭМПИЕМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ И МЕЗОТЕЛИОМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ. в: Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. 2019 ; Том 9, № 1. стр. 256-260.

BibTeX

@article{569f1f9b29a64ad0bf5b9f400a1b456d,
title = "СЛОЖНОСТИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗНОЙ ЭМПИЕМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ И МЕЗОТЕЛИОМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ",
abstract = "Purpose. Using the example of a clinical case, show the difficulties of differential diagnosis in atypical course of pleural tuberculous empyema, when X-ray examination data is more characteristic of pleural mesothelioma. Materials and methods. The clinical observation is given. A retrospective analysis of the data of laboratory and instrumental studies, as well as carrying out the necessary set of additional diagnostic procedures in St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute оf Phthisiopulmonology allowed to properly put the final diagnosis and choose the optimal treatment to the patient. Results. The present clinical observation has demonstrated the difficulty of differential diagnosis of tuberculous empyema and pleural mesothelioma, as well as the need for additional diagnostic procedures in order to reliably exclude the presence of cancer process in a given clinical case. Conclusion. Conducting a comprehensive examination of the patient in combination with the methods of morphological verification and comprehensive microbiological examination allows you to verify the correct diagnosis and prescribe adequate therapy.",
keywords = "Mesothelioma, Pleura, Tuberculosis",
author = "Smolnikova, {U. A.} and Gavrilov, {P. V.} and Ushkov, {A. D.} and Vasilyev, {I. V.} and Avetisyan, {A. O.}",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-1-256-260",
language = "русский",
volume = "9",
pages = "256--260",
journal = "Российский Электронный Журнал Лучевой Диагностики",
issn = "2222-7415",
publisher = "Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - СЛОЖНОСТИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗНОЙ ЭМПИЕМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ И МЕЗОТЕЛИОМЫ ПЛЕВРЫ

AU - Smolnikova, U. A.

AU - Gavrilov, P. V.

AU - Ushkov, A. D.

AU - Vasilyev, I. V.

AU - Avetisyan, A. O.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose. Using the example of a clinical case, show the difficulties of differential diagnosis in atypical course of pleural tuberculous empyema, when X-ray examination data is more characteristic of pleural mesothelioma. Materials and methods. The clinical observation is given. A retrospective analysis of the data of laboratory and instrumental studies, as well as carrying out the necessary set of additional diagnostic procedures in St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute оf Phthisiopulmonology allowed to properly put the final diagnosis and choose the optimal treatment to the patient. Results. The present clinical observation has demonstrated the difficulty of differential diagnosis of tuberculous empyema and pleural mesothelioma, as well as the need for additional diagnostic procedures in order to reliably exclude the presence of cancer process in a given clinical case. Conclusion. Conducting a comprehensive examination of the patient in combination with the methods of morphological verification and comprehensive microbiological examination allows you to verify the correct diagnosis and prescribe adequate therapy.

AB - Purpose. Using the example of a clinical case, show the difficulties of differential diagnosis in atypical course of pleural tuberculous empyema, when X-ray examination data is more characteristic of pleural mesothelioma. Materials and methods. The clinical observation is given. A retrospective analysis of the data of laboratory and instrumental studies, as well as carrying out the necessary set of additional diagnostic procedures in St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute оf Phthisiopulmonology allowed to properly put the final diagnosis and choose the optimal treatment to the patient. Results. The present clinical observation has demonstrated the difficulty of differential diagnosis of tuberculous empyema and pleural mesothelioma, as well as the need for additional diagnostic procedures in order to reliably exclude the presence of cancer process in a given clinical case. Conclusion. Conducting a comprehensive examination of the patient in combination with the methods of morphological verification and comprehensive microbiological examination allows you to verify the correct diagnosis and prescribe adequate therapy.

KW - Mesothelioma

KW - Pleura

KW - Tuberculosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068360591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-1-256-260

DO - 10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-1-256-260

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85068360591

VL - 9

SP - 256

EP - 260

JO - Российский Электронный Журнал Лучевой Диагностики

JF - Российский Электронный Журнал Лучевой Диагностики

SN - 2222-7415

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 51512011