Standard

ЛАПАРОСКОПИЧЕСКАЯ РЕЗЕКЦИЯ ПОЧКИ С ОПУХОЛЬЮ ПОД КОНТРОЛЕМ УЗИ. / Guseinov, R G; Popov, S V; Skryabin, O N; Orlov, I N; Vorobiev, A A; Bagrov, F A; Katunin, A S.

в: Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999), Том 1, № 2, 2019, стр. 63-67.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Guseinov, R G ; Popov, S V ; Skryabin, O N ; Orlov, I N ; Vorobiev, A A ; Bagrov, F A ; Katunin, A S. / ЛАПАРОСКОПИЧЕСКАЯ РЕЗЕКЦИЯ ПОЧКИ С ОПУХОЛЬЮ ПОД КОНТРОЛЕМ УЗИ. в: Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999). 2019 ; Том 1, № 2. стр. 63-67.

BibTeX

@article{a989fef5f05e4172b9dd845f9375e7a7,
title = "ЛАПАРОСКОПИЧЕСКАЯ РЕЗЕКЦИЯ ПОЧКИ С ОПУХОЛЬЮ ПОД КОНТРОЛЕМ УЗИ",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: The choice of method of surgical treatment for endophytic kidney tumors depends on the precise definition of the location and size, the extent of invasion into adjacent tissues and the type of vascularization. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in combination with 3D-CT allow to receive this information. The aim of this study was to compare the laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS and visualization in Full HD, 3D Full HD and 4K modes.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 77 patients aged 43-75 years with endophytic renal tumors were included in the study. They were undergone either extracorporeal partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS. We compared the rate of positive surgical margins, early postoperative bleeding, de novo renal failure or aggravation of preexisting renal failure and stricture of vesico-ureteric anastomosis.RESULTS: The rate of early postoperative bleeding, chronic kidney failure and pathologically-proven positive surgical margin in patients who underwent extracorporeal partial nephrectomy followed by kidney autotransplantation was 23.1%, 13.4% and 13.4%, respectively. After laparoscopic partial nephrectomy these values were 12%, 16.7% and 8.3%, respectively. The best outcomes were achieved in patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS and with a use of visualization in Full HD, 3D Full HD and 4K modes.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging, Laparoscopy, Margins of Excision, Middle Aged, Nephrectomy, Ultrasonography, Ultrasonography, Interventional",
author = "Guseinov, {R G} and Popov, {S V} and Skryabin, {O N} and Orlov, {I N} and Vorobiev, {A A} and Bagrov, {F A} and Katunin, {A S}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.18565/urology.2019.16.63-67",
language = "русский",
volume = "1",
pages = "63--67",
journal = "УРОЛОГИЯ",
issn = "1728-2985",
publisher = "Медицина",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ЛАПАРОСКОПИЧЕСКАЯ РЕЗЕКЦИЯ ПОЧКИ С ОПУХОЛЬЮ ПОД КОНТРОЛЕМ УЗИ

AU - Guseinov, R G

AU - Popov, S V

AU - Skryabin, O N

AU - Orlov, I N

AU - Vorobiev, A A

AU - Bagrov, F A

AU - Katunin, A S

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - INTRODUCTION: The choice of method of surgical treatment for endophytic kidney tumors depends on the precise definition of the location and size, the extent of invasion into adjacent tissues and the type of vascularization. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in combination with 3D-CT allow to receive this information. The aim of this study was to compare the laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS and visualization in Full HD, 3D Full HD and 4K modes.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 77 patients aged 43-75 years with endophytic renal tumors were included in the study. They were undergone either extracorporeal partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS. We compared the rate of positive surgical margins, early postoperative bleeding, de novo renal failure or aggravation of preexisting renal failure and stricture of vesico-ureteric anastomosis.RESULTS: The rate of early postoperative bleeding, chronic kidney failure and pathologically-proven positive surgical margin in patients who underwent extracorporeal partial nephrectomy followed by kidney autotransplantation was 23.1%, 13.4% and 13.4%, respectively. After laparoscopic partial nephrectomy these values were 12%, 16.7% and 8.3%, respectively. The best outcomes were achieved in patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS and with a use of visualization in Full HD, 3D Full HD and 4K modes.

AB - INTRODUCTION: The choice of method of surgical treatment for endophytic kidney tumors depends on the precise definition of the location and size, the extent of invasion into adjacent tissues and the type of vascularization. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in combination with 3D-CT allow to receive this information. The aim of this study was to compare the laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS and visualization in Full HD, 3D Full HD and 4K modes.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 77 patients aged 43-75 years with endophytic renal tumors were included in the study. They were undergone either extracorporeal partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS. We compared the rate of positive surgical margins, early postoperative bleeding, de novo renal failure or aggravation of preexisting renal failure and stricture of vesico-ureteric anastomosis.RESULTS: The rate of early postoperative bleeding, chronic kidney failure and pathologically-proven positive surgical margin in patients who underwent extracorporeal partial nephrectomy followed by kidney autotransplantation was 23.1%, 13.4% and 13.4%, respectively. After laparoscopic partial nephrectomy these values were 12%, 16.7% and 8.3%, respectively. The best outcomes were achieved in patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with IOUS and with a use of visualization in Full HD, 3D Full HD and 4K modes.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Humans

KW - Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Margins of Excision

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Nephrectomy

KW - Ultrasonography

KW - Ultrasonography, Interventional

U2 - 10.18565/urology.2019.16.63-67

DO - 10.18565/urology.2019.16.63-67

M3 - статья

C2 - 31184020

VL - 1

SP - 63

EP - 67

JO - УРОЛОГИЯ

JF - УРОЛОГИЯ

SN - 1728-2985

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 52358145