Standard

Символика музея в институциональной теории и выставочных проектах. / Biryukova, Marina Valerievna.

в: Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art, Том 11, 2021, стр. 810-818.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатья в журнале по материалам конференцииРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{19abd3d63d4e4312a0a677e85f0c257f,
title = "Символика музея в институциональной теории и выставочных проектах",
abstract = "The article considers the role of the museum as an actor of institutional practice in determining the status of contemporary art. The institutional theory of George Dickie and Arthur C. Danto is an adequate alternative to aesthetics in the evaluation of contemporary artworks, though in the last decades the art world became more and more commercialized. Big galleries, art dealers, and art auctions are actively involved in evaluating art. Nevertheless, the museum often remains the last judge to label an artwork as {\textquoteleft}real{\textquoteright} art. If in a traditional museum one expects to see {\textquoteleft}authentic{\textquoteright} works of classical art, in a museum of contemporary art he/she expects to see {\textquoteleft}true{\textquoteright} art, i.e. artworks recognized as art by museum experts. The popularity of the idea, meaning, and symbolics of the museum is demonstrated in numerous curatorial conceptions. The attraction of the museum idea in the context of contemporary art and exhibition practice was shown, for example, in the project “Lc. 15: 11-32” in the Russian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale (2019), curated by the State Hermitage Museum. The exposition at the Pavilion reflected the tragedy of human being in the context of contemporaneity, the Gospel parable, and paraphrases of well-known pictures of Dutch and Flemish schools of painting at the Hermitage. This and other projects dedicated to the idea of the museum show modern metamorphoses of traditional museum tasks: to collect, to label, to demonstrate, and to educate.",
keywords = "Aesthetics, Art theory, Contemporary art, Curatorial project, Exhibition, Idea, Institutional theory, Museum",
author = "Biryukova, {Marina Valerievna}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Saint Petersburg State University. All rights reserved.; IX Международная конференция «Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства», АПТИИ-IX ; Conference date: 26-10-2020 Through 31-10-2020",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.18688/AA2111-09-65",
language = "русский",
volume = "11",
pages = "810--818",
journal = "Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства",
issn = "2312-2129",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
url = "https://actual-art.spbu.ru , https://actual-art.spbu.ru/o-konferentsii/arkhiv/2020/programma.html",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Символика музея в институциональной теории и выставочных проектах

AU - Biryukova, Marina Valerievna

N1 - Conference code: IX

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The article considers the role of the museum as an actor of institutional practice in determining the status of contemporary art. The institutional theory of George Dickie and Arthur C. Danto is an adequate alternative to aesthetics in the evaluation of contemporary artworks, though in the last decades the art world became more and more commercialized. Big galleries, art dealers, and art auctions are actively involved in evaluating art. Nevertheless, the museum often remains the last judge to label an artwork as ‘real’ art. If in a traditional museum one expects to see ‘authentic’ works of classical art, in a museum of contemporary art he/she expects to see ‘true’ art, i.e. artworks recognized as art by museum experts. The popularity of the idea, meaning, and symbolics of the museum is demonstrated in numerous curatorial conceptions. The attraction of the museum idea in the context of contemporary art and exhibition practice was shown, for example, in the project “Lc. 15: 11-32” in the Russian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale (2019), curated by the State Hermitage Museum. The exposition at the Pavilion reflected the tragedy of human being in the context of contemporaneity, the Gospel parable, and paraphrases of well-known pictures of Dutch and Flemish schools of painting at the Hermitage. This and other projects dedicated to the idea of the museum show modern metamorphoses of traditional museum tasks: to collect, to label, to demonstrate, and to educate.

AB - The article considers the role of the museum as an actor of institutional practice in determining the status of contemporary art. The institutional theory of George Dickie and Arthur C. Danto is an adequate alternative to aesthetics in the evaluation of contemporary artworks, though in the last decades the art world became more and more commercialized. Big galleries, art dealers, and art auctions are actively involved in evaluating art. Nevertheless, the museum often remains the last judge to label an artwork as ‘real’ art. If in a traditional museum one expects to see ‘authentic’ works of classical art, in a museum of contemporary art he/she expects to see ‘true’ art, i.e. artworks recognized as art by museum experts. The popularity of the idea, meaning, and symbolics of the museum is demonstrated in numerous curatorial conceptions. The attraction of the museum idea in the context of contemporary art and exhibition practice was shown, for example, in the project “Lc. 15: 11-32” in the Russian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale (2019), curated by the State Hermitage Museum. The exposition at the Pavilion reflected the tragedy of human being in the context of contemporaneity, the Gospel parable, and paraphrases of well-known pictures of Dutch and Flemish schools of painting at the Hermitage. This and other projects dedicated to the idea of the museum show modern metamorphoses of traditional museum tasks: to collect, to label, to demonstrate, and to educate.

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Art theory

KW - Contemporary art

KW - Curatorial project

KW - Exhibition

KW - Idea

KW - Institutional theory

KW - Museum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124744740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18688/AA2111-09-65

DO - 10.18688/AA2111-09-65

M3 - статья в журнале по материалам конференции

AN - SCOPUS:85124744740

VL - 11

SP - 810

EP - 818

JO - Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства

JF - Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства

SN - 2312-2129

T2 - IX Международная конференция «Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства»

Y2 - 26 October 2020 through 31 October 2020

ER -

ID: 93978172