Standard

Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии. / Веселов, Федор Никитович.

в: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ, Том 69, № 3, 2024, стр. 566-579.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Веселов, ФН 2024, 'Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии', ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ, Том. 69, № 3, стр. 566-579. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2024.302

APA

Веселов, Ф. Н. (2024). Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии. ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ, 69(3), 566-579. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2024.302

Vancouver

Веселов ФН. Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии. ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ. 2024;69(3):566-579. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2024.302

Author

Веселов, Федор Никитович. / Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии. в: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ. 2024 ; Том 69, № 3. стр. 566-579.

BibTeX

@article{3858a0e11b844c54b990d2faaf5edc5b,
title = "Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии",
abstract = "There is very little reliable information in the historical sources concerning biography of Oleg Ingvarevich Ryazanskii, a prince of the period of the Mongol conquest of the Russian lands and the establishment of the yoke of the Horde. In fact, in the oldest Russian chronicles and in the laater all-Russian annals it is only reported that Oleg, along with other Ryazan princes, went to the river Voronezh to fight the Mongols in 1237, was released from the captivity in 1252, and died in 1258. Based on such data, both Moscow scribes of the 16th century and a number of modern historians came to the conclusion that the prince spent a decade and a half in Mongolian captivity. However, recent opponents to “historiographic myths” offer a revision of such “misconceptions” and paint a biography of the Ryazan prince full of diplomatic schemes and travels. They refer to information from later sources of the fifteenth and late seventeenth centuries. In fact, it turns out that marginal chronicles are secondary, bear traces of editorial changes, or are the result of scribes{\textquoteright} errors. Nevertheless, there is no information about the alleged diplomatic successes of Oleg Ingvarevich in the reports of the papal envoy to the Mongol Empire, Giovanni da Pian del Carpine, who carefully recorded the stay of the Russian princes at the courts of Batu Khan and the Great Khan. The obvious unreliability of information in later chronicles, on the one hand, and the lack of references to the activities of Oleg in foreign sources, on the other, makes us treat this kind of historical reconstructions with irony.",
keywords = "Олег Ингваревич, монгольское нашествие, Батый (Бату), Александр Невский, Новгородско-Софийские летописи, Вологодская летопись, Летопись Авраамки, Alexander Nevsky, Batu Khan, Novgorod-Sofian Chronicles, Oleg Ingvarevich, the Avraamka Chronicle, the Mongol invasion, the Vologda Chronicle",
author = "Веселов, {Федор Никитович}",
note = "Веселов Ф. Н. Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. История. 2024. Т. 69. Вып. 3. С. 566–579. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2024.302",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.21638/spbu02.2024.302",
language = "русский",
volume = "69",
pages = "566--579",
journal = "ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ",
issn = "1812-9323",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии

AU - Веселов, Федор Никитович

N1 - Веселов Ф. Н. Олег Ингваревич Рязанский в источниках и историографии // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. История. 2024. Т. 69. Вып. 3. С. 566–579. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2024.302

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - There is very little reliable information in the historical sources concerning biography of Oleg Ingvarevich Ryazanskii, a prince of the period of the Mongol conquest of the Russian lands and the establishment of the yoke of the Horde. In fact, in the oldest Russian chronicles and in the laater all-Russian annals it is only reported that Oleg, along with other Ryazan princes, went to the river Voronezh to fight the Mongols in 1237, was released from the captivity in 1252, and died in 1258. Based on such data, both Moscow scribes of the 16th century and a number of modern historians came to the conclusion that the prince spent a decade and a half in Mongolian captivity. However, recent opponents to “historiographic myths” offer a revision of such “misconceptions” and paint a biography of the Ryazan prince full of diplomatic schemes and travels. They refer to information from later sources of the fifteenth and late seventeenth centuries. In fact, it turns out that marginal chronicles are secondary, bear traces of editorial changes, or are the result of scribes’ errors. Nevertheless, there is no information about the alleged diplomatic successes of Oleg Ingvarevich in the reports of the papal envoy to the Mongol Empire, Giovanni da Pian del Carpine, who carefully recorded the stay of the Russian princes at the courts of Batu Khan and the Great Khan. The obvious unreliability of information in later chronicles, on the one hand, and the lack of references to the activities of Oleg in foreign sources, on the other, makes us treat this kind of historical reconstructions with irony.

AB - There is very little reliable information in the historical sources concerning biography of Oleg Ingvarevich Ryazanskii, a prince of the period of the Mongol conquest of the Russian lands and the establishment of the yoke of the Horde. In fact, in the oldest Russian chronicles and in the laater all-Russian annals it is only reported that Oleg, along with other Ryazan princes, went to the river Voronezh to fight the Mongols in 1237, was released from the captivity in 1252, and died in 1258. Based on such data, both Moscow scribes of the 16th century and a number of modern historians came to the conclusion that the prince spent a decade and a half in Mongolian captivity. However, recent opponents to “historiographic myths” offer a revision of such “misconceptions” and paint a biography of the Ryazan prince full of diplomatic schemes and travels. They refer to information from later sources of the fifteenth and late seventeenth centuries. In fact, it turns out that marginal chronicles are secondary, bear traces of editorial changes, or are the result of scribes’ errors. Nevertheless, there is no information about the alleged diplomatic successes of Oleg Ingvarevich in the reports of the papal envoy to the Mongol Empire, Giovanni da Pian del Carpine, who carefully recorded the stay of the Russian princes at the courts of Batu Khan and the Great Khan. The obvious unreliability of information in later chronicles, on the one hand, and the lack of references to the activities of Oleg in foreign sources, on the other, makes us treat this kind of historical reconstructions with irony.

KW - Олег Ингваревич

KW - монгольское нашествие

KW - Батый (Бату)

KW - Александр Невский

KW - Новгородско-Софийские летописи

KW - Вологодская летопись

KW - Летопись Авраамки

KW - Alexander Nevsky

KW - Batu Khan

KW - Novgorod-Sofian Chronicles

KW - Oleg Ingvarevich

KW - the Avraamka Chronicle

KW - the Mongol invasion

KW - the Vologda Chronicle

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5cfc8042-0d5b-3e58-b9c7-cf60140a9c72/

U2 - 10.21638/spbu02.2024.302

DO - 10.21638/spbu02.2024.302

M3 - статья

VL - 69

SP - 566

EP - 579

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ

SN - 1812-9323

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 126192933