Standard

Междисциплинарность в структуре современной методологии истории. / Рябова, Людмила Константиновна; Петров, Евгений Вадимович; Рябов, Анатолий.

в: RUDN Journal of Russian History, Том 21, № 2, 02.06.2022, стр. 244-250.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{a65aaeaeb08f4c9db65ec895cdccc77e,
title = "Междисциплинарность в структуре современной методологии истории",
abstract = "The integration of humanitarian research has greatly expanded the range of related disciplines involved in the process of historical cognition. The article examines the epistemological aspects of interdisciplinaryism as the main principle of the development of modern history methodolo-gy. The consequence of strengthening inter-subject relationships in historical studies was the complexi-ty of vocabulary, the emergence of new concepts borrowed from related disciplines. The modern con-ceptual system is caused by the appearance of new objects of study, which were not in the “classical” historical science, so called “event history.” Some of them (gender, historical memory, totalitarianism, childhood, the environment, etc.) are established in their status of “historical” and interdisciplinary. At the same time, there appeared new objects of “non-event” history studies (history of emotions, vio-lence, etc.) which require an appeal to evolutionary psychology, historical sociology, anthropology and other areas of humanitarian knowledge.",
keywords = "inter-pretive history, interdisciplinarity, methodology of history, non-event history, social history",
author = "Рябова, {Людмила Константиновна} and Петров, {Евгений Вадимович} and Анатолий Рябов",
note = "Рябова Л.К., Петров Е.В., Рябов А.А. Междисциплинарность в струк- туре современной методологии истории // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: История России. 2022. Т. 21. № 2. С. 244–250. doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-244-250",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "2",
doi = "10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-244-250",
language = "русский",
volume = "21",
pages = "244--250",
journal = "RUDN Journal of Russian History",
issn = "2312-8674",
publisher = "Российский университет дружбы народов",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Междисциплинарность в структуре современной методологии истории

AU - Рябова, Людмила Константиновна

AU - Петров, Евгений Вадимович

AU - Рябов, Анатолий

N1 - Рябова Л.К., Петров Е.В., Рябов А.А. Междисциплинарность в струк- туре современной методологии истории // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: История России. 2022. Т. 21. № 2. С. 244–250. doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-244-250

PY - 2022/6/2

Y1 - 2022/6/2

N2 - The integration of humanitarian research has greatly expanded the range of related disciplines involved in the process of historical cognition. The article examines the epistemological aspects of interdisciplinaryism as the main principle of the development of modern history methodolo-gy. The consequence of strengthening inter-subject relationships in historical studies was the complexi-ty of vocabulary, the emergence of new concepts borrowed from related disciplines. The modern con-ceptual system is caused by the appearance of new objects of study, which were not in the “classical” historical science, so called “event history.” Some of them (gender, historical memory, totalitarianism, childhood, the environment, etc.) are established in their status of “historical” and interdisciplinary. At the same time, there appeared new objects of “non-event” history studies (history of emotions, vio-lence, etc.) which require an appeal to evolutionary psychology, historical sociology, anthropology and other areas of humanitarian knowledge.

AB - The integration of humanitarian research has greatly expanded the range of related disciplines involved in the process of historical cognition. The article examines the epistemological aspects of interdisciplinaryism as the main principle of the development of modern history methodolo-gy. The consequence of strengthening inter-subject relationships in historical studies was the complexi-ty of vocabulary, the emergence of new concepts borrowed from related disciplines. The modern con-ceptual system is caused by the appearance of new objects of study, which were not in the “classical” historical science, so called “event history.” Some of them (gender, historical memory, totalitarianism, childhood, the environment, etc.) are established in their status of “historical” and interdisciplinary. At the same time, there appeared new objects of “non-event” history studies (history of emotions, vio-lence, etc.) which require an appeal to evolutionary psychology, historical sociology, anthropology and other areas of humanitarian knowledge.

KW - inter-pretive history

KW - interdisciplinarity

KW - methodology of history

KW - non-event history

KW - social history

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132194894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a2673485-2a6c-3de9-82fd-e9b37391a065/

U2 - 10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-244-250

DO - 10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-244-250

M3 - статья

VL - 21

SP - 244

EP - 250

JO - RUDN Journal of Russian History

JF - RUDN Journal of Russian History

SN - 2312-8674

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 94435482