Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Междисциплинарность в структуре современной методологии истории. / Рябова, Людмила Константиновна; Петров, Евгений Вадимович; Рябов, Анатолий.
в: RUDN Journal of Russian History, Том 21, № 2, 02.06.2022, стр. 244-250.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Междисциплинарность в структуре современной методологии истории
AU - Рябова, Людмила Константиновна
AU - Петров, Евгений Вадимович
AU - Рябов, Анатолий
N1 - Рябова Л.К., Петров Е.В., Рябов А.А. Междисциплинарность в струк- туре современной методологии истории // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: История России. 2022. Т. 21. № 2. С. 244–250. doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-244-250
PY - 2022/6/2
Y1 - 2022/6/2
N2 - The integration of humanitarian research has greatly expanded the range of related disciplines involved in the process of historical cognition. The article examines the epistemological aspects of interdisciplinaryism as the main principle of the development of modern history methodolo-gy. The consequence of strengthening inter-subject relationships in historical studies was the complexi-ty of vocabulary, the emergence of new concepts borrowed from related disciplines. The modern con-ceptual system is caused by the appearance of new objects of study, which were not in the “classical” historical science, so called “event history.” Some of them (gender, historical memory, totalitarianism, childhood, the environment, etc.) are established in their status of “historical” and interdisciplinary. At the same time, there appeared new objects of “non-event” history studies (history of emotions, vio-lence, etc.) which require an appeal to evolutionary psychology, historical sociology, anthropology and other areas of humanitarian knowledge.
AB - The integration of humanitarian research has greatly expanded the range of related disciplines involved in the process of historical cognition. The article examines the epistemological aspects of interdisciplinaryism as the main principle of the development of modern history methodolo-gy. The consequence of strengthening inter-subject relationships in historical studies was the complexi-ty of vocabulary, the emergence of new concepts borrowed from related disciplines. The modern con-ceptual system is caused by the appearance of new objects of study, which were not in the “classical” historical science, so called “event history.” Some of them (gender, historical memory, totalitarianism, childhood, the environment, etc.) are established in their status of “historical” and interdisciplinary. At the same time, there appeared new objects of “non-event” history studies (history of emotions, vio-lence, etc.) which require an appeal to evolutionary psychology, historical sociology, anthropology and other areas of humanitarian knowledge.
KW - inter-pretive history
KW - interdisciplinarity
KW - methodology of history
KW - non-event history
KW - social history
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132194894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a2673485-2a6c-3de9-82fd-e9b37391a065/
U2 - 10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-244-250
DO - 10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-244-250
M3 - статья
VL - 21
SP - 244
EP - 250
JO - RUDN Journal of Russian History
JF - RUDN Journal of Russian History
SN - 2312-8674
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 94435482