Standard

ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫХ ОСНОВ АРКТИЧЕСКОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ США. / Konyshev, Valery N.; Sergunin, Alexander A.

в: Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriia 4: Istoriia, Regionovedenie, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia, Том 27, № 2, 01.04.2022, стр. 225-236.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Konyshev, VN & Sergunin, AA 2022, 'ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫХ ОСНОВ АРКТИЧЕСКОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ США', Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriia 4: Istoriia, Regionovedenie, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia, Том. 27, № 2, стр. 225-236. https://doi.org/10.15688/JVOLSU4.2022.2.19

APA

Konyshev, V. N., & Sergunin, A. A. (2022). ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫХ ОСНОВ АРКТИЧЕСКОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ США. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriia 4: Istoriia, Regionovedenie, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia, 27(2), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.15688/JVOLSU4.2022.2.19

Vancouver

Konyshev VN, Sergunin AA. ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫХ ОСНОВ АРКТИЧЕСКОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ США. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriia 4: Istoriia, Regionovedenie, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia. 2022 Апр. 1;27(2):225-236. https://doi.org/10.15688/JVOLSU4.2022.2.19

Author

Konyshev, Valery N. ; Sergunin, Alexander A. / ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫХ ОСНОВ АРКТИЧЕСКОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ США. в: Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriia 4: Istoriia, Regionovedenie, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia. 2022 ; Том 27, № 2. стр. 225-236.

BibTeX

@article{1bf49f6373d0456dab88deda38f65c09,
title = "ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫХ ОСНОВ АРКТИЧЕСКОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ США",
abstract = "Introduction. The article examines the features of the main stages in the evolution of the U.S. Arctic strategy in the period after the end of the Cold War that helps to understand the future of American regional policy. The United States is one of the main participants in the Arctic policy, on which the state of security and cooperation in the region largely depends. Methods and materials. The empirical basis for the study was the documents of various institutions and departments involved in the planning, implementation and control of the U.S. Arctic policy. These documents include the directives and public papers of the president, documents of the Department of Defense, the Arctic strategies of ministries and departments, reports of the Congressional Research Service, documents of “think tanks”. Analysis. The article concludes that the Arctic became a priority of U.S. policy only in the early 2000s after the revival of Russia{\textquoteright}s activity in the Far North. The U.S. strategy was finalized only under President Barack Obama. It directed to achieving American dominance in all spheres by combining political, diplomatic, economic, military instruments. If B. Obama considered international cooperation in the Arctic productive, then the next President D. Trump shifted the American strategy towards nationalism and isolationism, curtailing many cooperation projects. Results. The development of the American strategy was inconsistent, and so far it does not represent a coherent, consistent vision of American policy in the Arctic. Relations between the United States and Russia in the Arctic decreased in the aftermath of the Ukrainian crisis, but objective conditions for cooperation remain. The scenario for the further evolution of bilateral relations remains uncertain under J. Biden. Authors{\textquoteright}contribution. Valery Konyshev: introduction, contours of the Arctic policy after the end of the Cold War: strategic interests, development of the U.S. Arctic Doctrine: limited cooperation. Alexander Sergunin: methods and materials, revision of the Arctic doctrine: from cooperation to rivalry, results.",
keywords = "Arctic, foreign policy, Russian-American relations, security, strategy, Arctic, Russian-American relations, foreign policy, security, strategy",
author = "Konyshev, {Valery N.} and Sergunin, {Alexander A.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Volgograd State University. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.15688/JVOLSU4.2022.2.19",
language = "русский",
volume = "27",
pages = "225--236",
journal = "Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriia 4: Istoriia, Regionovedenie, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia",
issn = "1998-9938",
publisher = "Волгоградский государственный университет",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫХ ОСНОВ АРКТИЧЕСКОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ США

AU - Konyshev, Valery N.

AU - Sergunin, Alexander A.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Volgograd State University. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/4/1

Y1 - 2022/4/1

N2 - Introduction. The article examines the features of the main stages in the evolution of the U.S. Arctic strategy in the period after the end of the Cold War that helps to understand the future of American regional policy. The United States is one of the main participants in the Arctic policy, on which the state of security and cooperation in the region largely depends. Methods and materials. The empirical basis for the study was the documents of various institutions and departments involved in the planning, implementation and control of the U.S. Arctic policy. These documents include the directives and public papers of the president, documents of the Department of Defense, the Arctic strategies of ministries and departments, reports of the Congressional Research Service, documents of “think tanks”. Analysis. The article concludes that the Arctic became a priority of U.S. policy only in the early 2000s after the revival of Russia’s activity in the Far North. The U.S. strategy was finalized only under President Barack Obama. It directed to achieving American dominance in all spheres by combining political, diplomatic, economic, military instruments. If B. Obama considered international cooperation in the Arctic productive, then the next President D. Trump shifted the American strategy towards nationalism and isolationism, curtailing many cooperation projects. Results. The development of the American strategy was inconsistent, and so far it does not represent a coherent, consistent vision of American policy in the Arctic. Relations between the United States and Russia in the Arctic decreased in the aftermath of the Ukrainian crisis, but objective conditions for cooperation remain. The scenario for the further evolution of bilateral relations remains uncertain under J. Biden. Authors’contribution. Valery Konyshev: introduction, contours of the Arctic policy after the end of the Cold War: strategic interests, development of the U.S. Arctic Doctrine: limited cooperation. Alexander Sergunin: methods and materials, revision of the Arctic doctrine: from cooperation to rivalry, results.

AB - Introduction. The article examines the features of the main stages in the evolution of the U.S. Arctic strategy in the period after the end of the Cold War that helps to understand the future of American regional policy. The United States is one of the main participants in the Arctic policy, on which the state of security and cooperation in the region largely depends. Methods and materials. The empirical basis for the study was the documents of various institutions and departments involved in the planning, implementation and control of the U.S. Arctic policy. These documents include the directives and public papers of the president, documents of the Department of Defense, the Arctic strategies of ministries and departments, reports of the Congressional Research Service, documents of “think tanks”. Analysis. The article concludes that the Arctic became a priority of U.S. policy only in the early 2000s after the revival of Russia’s activity in the Far North. The U.S. strategy was finalized only under President Barack Obama. It directed to achieving American dominance in all spheres by combining political, diplomatic, economic, military instruments. If B. Obama considered international cooperation in the Arctic productive, then the next President D. Trump shifted the American strategy towards nationalism and isolationism, curtailing many cooperation projects. Results. The development of the American strategy was inconsistent, and so far it does not represent a coherent, consistent vision of American policy in the Arctic. Relations between the United States and Russia in the Arctic decreased in the aftermath of the Ukrainian crisis, but objective conditions for cooperation remain. The scenario for the further evolution of bilateral relations remains uncertain under J. Biden. Authors’contribution. Valery Konyshev: introduction, contours of the Arctic policy after the end of the Cold War: strategic interests, development of the U.S. Arctic Doctrine: limited cooperation. Alexander Sergunin: methods and materials, revision of the Arctic doctrine: from cooperation to rivalry, results.

KW - Arctic

KW - foreign policy

KW - Russian-American relations

KW - security

KW - strategy

KW - Arctic

KW - Russian-American relations

KW - foreign policy

KW - security

KW - strategy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130177684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e8573b8a-745b-3bfd-a703-541d4c0f9748/

U2 - 10.15688/JVOLSU4.2022.2.19

DO - 10.15688/JVOLSU4.2022.2.19

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85130177684

VL - 27

SP - 225

EP - 236

JO - Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriia 4: Istoriia, Regionovedenie, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia

JF - Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriia 4: Istoriia, Regionovedenie, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia

SN - 1998-9938

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 97314231