Standard

ПРОТИВОДЕЙСТВИЕ АРИСТОТЕЛИЗМУ В ЕВРЕЙСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЕ: КОНФЛИКТ ВОКРУГ ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЙ МАЙМОНИДА В XIII В. С ТОЧКИ ЗРЕНИЯ ТЕОРИИ ИГР. / Gershowitz, Uri; Kuzyutin, Denis.

в: SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ, Том 15, № 1, 8, 2021, стр. 126-160.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{7f979f002cb645738baed6d3de486f2a,
title = "ПРОТИВОДЕЙСТВИЕ АРИСТОТЕЛИЗМУ В ЕВРЕЙСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЕ:: КОНФЛИКТ ВОКРУГ ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЙ МАЙМОНИДА В XIII В. С ТОЧКИ ЗРЕНИЯ ТЕОРИИ ИГР",
abstract = "The Maimonidean Controversy at the beginning of the 13th century was one of the most significant conflicts in the midst of the Jewish diasporas in the Middle Ages. The conflict followed a vivid discussion on the treatises of Maimonides and the interpretation of Judaism in the light of Aristotelian philosophy. Almost all of major Jewish communities in Europe were drawn in this conflict. Moreover, at some point the conflict expanded outside of the Jewish world, so that some works of Maimonides were burnt by the Christian Inquisition as heretical books. Despite the significance of these events and the trace left in the memory of the Jewish people, there is not much reliable evidence about them. The authors aim to discuss the history of this conflict, focusing on the problematic aspects of the Maimonides' teaching, and to make a reconstruction of the events occurred, to provide a specification of main characteristics of the conflict interaction (the players, their strategies and preferences, possible outcomes of the conflict, conflict dynamics, etc.), to design a game-theoretical model of the social conflict under consideration and to explore this model using the methods of mathematical game theory. It turns out that the majority of the players' actions correspond to optimal behavior concepts employed in game theory (bargaining solutions, Pareto efficiency, Nash equilibria). However, some actions obviously contradict the concept of rational behavior (one of the fundamental assumptions in mathematical game theory), and namely these actions induced the conflict escalation and such a tragic outcome.",
keywords = "Aristotelianism, Judaism, Maimonides, Maimonidean Controversy, Social Conflict, Mathematical Game Theory, Aristotelianism, Judaism, Maimonides, Maimonidean Controversy, Social Conflict, Mathematical Game Theory",
author = "Uri Gershowitz and Denis Kuzyutin",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Center for Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-1-126-160",
language = "русский",
volume = "15",
pages = "126--160",
journal = "SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ",
issn = "1995-4328",
publisher = "Издательство Новосибирского университета",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ПРОТИВОДЕЙСТВИЕ АРИСТОТЕЛИЗМУ В ЕВРЕЙСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЕ:

T2 - КОНФЛИКТ ВОКРУГ ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЙ МАЙМОНИДА В XIII В. С ТОЧКИ ЗРЕНИЯ ТЕОРИИ ИГР

AU - Gershowitz, Uri

AU - Kuzyutin, Denis

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Center for Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The Maimonidean Controversy at the beginning of the 13th century was one of the most significant conflicts in the midst of the Jewish diasporas in the Middle Ages. The conflict followed a vivid discussion on the treatises of Maimonides and the interpretation of Judaism in the light of Aristotelian philosophy. Almost all of major Jewish communities in Europe were drawn in this conflict. Moreover, at some point the conflict expanded outside of the Jewish world, so that some works of Maimonides were burnt by the Christian Inquisition as heretical books. Despite the significance of these events and the trace left in the memory of the Jewish people, there is not much reliable evidence about them. The authors aim to discuss the history of this conflict, focusing on the problematic aspects of the Maimonides' teaching, and to make a reconstruction of the events occurred, to provide a specification of main characteristics of the conflict interaction (the players, their strategies and preferences, possible outcomes of the conflict, conflict dynamics, etc.), to design a game-theoretical model of the social conflict under consideration and to explore this model using the methods of mathematical game theory. It turns out that the majority of the players' actions correspond to optimal behavior concepts employed in game theory (bargaining solutions, Pareto efficiency, Nash equilibria). However, some actions obviously contradict the concept of rational behavior (one of the fundamental assumptions in mathematical game theory), and namely these actions induced the conflict escalation and such a tragic outcome.

AB - The Maimonidean Controversy at the beginning of the 13th century was one of the most significant conflicts in the midst of the Jewish diasporas in the Middle Ages. The conflict followed a vivid discussion on the treatises of Maimonides and the interpretation of Judaism in the light of Aristotelian philosophy. Almost all of major Jewish communities in Europe were drawn in this conflict. Moreover, at some point the conflict expanded outside of the Jewish world, so that some works of Maimonides were burnt by the Christian Inquisition as heretical books. Despite the significance of these events and the trace left in the memory of the Jewish people, there is not much reliable evidence about them. The authors aim to discuss the history of this conflict, focusing on the problematic aspects of the Maimonides' teaching, and to make a reconstruction of the events occurred, to provide a specification of main characteristics of the conflict interaction (the players, their strategies and preferences, possible outcomes of the conflict, conflict dynamics, etc.), to design a game-theoretical model of the social conflict under consideration and to explore this model using the methods of mathematical game theory. It turns out that the majority of the players' actions correspond to optimal behavior concepts employed in game theory (bargaining solutions, Pareto efficiency, Nash equilibria). However, some actions obviously contradict the concept of rational behavior (one of the fundamental assumptions in mathematical game theory), and namely these actions induced the conflict escalation and such a tragic outcome.

KW - Aristotelianism, Judaism, Maimonides, Maimonidean Controversy, Social Conflict, Mathematical Game Theory

KW - Aristotelianism

KW - Judaism

KW - Maimonides

KW - Maimonidean Controversy

KW - Social Conflict

KW - Mathematical Game Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101643782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/12976d1a-0fd0-3609-a489-da8da90daf26/

U2 - 10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-1-126-160

DO - 10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-1-126-160

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85101643782

VL - 15

SP - 126

EP - 160

JO - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

JF - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

SN - 1995-4328

IS - 1

M1 - 8

ER -

ID: 73581765