Жизненная драма Владимира Соловьева

Standard

Жизненная драма Владимира Соловьева. / Евлампиев, И.И.

в: ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ, № 2, 2011, стр. 127-138.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

BibTeX

@article{7677eaa35bcc408dae8f2cb7bb6ccffe,

title = "Жизненная драма Владимира Соловьева",

abstract = "{"}Three conversations on war, progress and the world history end{"} designates Solovyov's repudiation of main ideas of his philosophy, first of all from concept of unity of God and person, which is expressed in idea of God-Menhood. Formally aim of this work is a refutation of Lev Tolstoy's moral doctrine, but really Solovyov denies and even derides key positions of F. Dostoevsky's philosophy. In this sense Solovyov in last work repudiates of his spiritual teacher. He rejects Dostoevsky's major idea that separate person can spiritually influence other people and do them better, more good. He asserts that only direct intervention of God can rescue mankind from evil and imperfection. As a result he rejects idea of the free, philosophically clarified faith and comes back to church Christianity and the dogmatic doctrine considering the person as a sinful and feeble being.",

keywords = "Christianity, Dostoevsky, God-Menhood, Lev Tolstoy, Resistance of evil, Russian philosophy, Vladimir solovyov",

author = "И.И. Евлампиев",

year = "2011",

language = "русский",

pages = "127--138",

journal = "ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ",

issn = "0042-8744",

publisher = "Международная книга",

number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Жизненная драма Владимира Соловьева

AU - Евлампиев, И.И.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - "Three conversations on war, progress and the world history end" designates Solovyov's repudiation of main ideas of his philosophy, first of all from concept of unity of God and person, which is expressed in idea of God-Menhood. Formally aim of this work is a refutation of Lev Tolstoy's moral doctrine, but really Solovyov denies and even derides key positions of F. Dostoevsky's philosophy. In this sense Solovyov in last work repudiates of his spiritual teacher. He rejects Dostoevsky's major idea that separate person can spiritually influence other people and do them better, more good. He asserts that only direct intervention of God can rescue mankind from evil and imperfection. As a result he rejects idea of the free, philosophically clarified faith and comes back to church Christianity and the dogmatic doctrine considering the person as a sinful and feeble being.

AB - "Three conversations on war, progress and the world history end" designates Solovyov's repudiation of main ideas of his philosophy, first of all from concept of unity of God and person, which is expressed in idea of God-Menhood. Formally aim of this work is a refutation of Lev Tolstoy's moral doctrine, but really Solovyov denies and even derides key positions of F. Dostoevsky's philosophy. In this sense Solovyov in last work repudiates of his spiritual teacher. He rejects Dostoevsky's major idea that separate person can spiritually influence other people and do them better, more good. He asserts that only direct intervention of God can rescue mankind from evil and imperfection. As a result he rejects idea of the free, philosophically clarified faith and comes back to church Christianity and the dogmatic doctrine considering the person as a sinful and feeble being.

KW - Christianity

KW - Dostoevsky

KW - God-Menhood

KW - Lev Tolstoy

KW - Resistance of evil

KW - Russian philosophy

KW - Vladimir solovyov

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029528144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - статья

SP - 127

EP - 138

JO - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ

JF - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ

SN - 0042-8744

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 5073887

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

RIS